Literature DB >> 19349831

Use of axial and subaxial translaminar screw fixation in the management of upper cervical spinal instability in a series of 7 children.

Roukoz B Chamoun1, Katherine M Relyea, Keyne K Johnson, William E Whitehead, Daniel J Curry, Thomas G Luerssen, James M Drake, Andrew Jea.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The management of upper cervical spinal instability in children continues to represent a technical challenge. Traditionally, a number of wiring techniques followed by halo orthosis have been applied; however, they have been associated with a high rate of nonunion and poor tolerance for the halo. Alternatively, C1-C2 transarticular screws and C2 pars/pedicle screws allow more rigid fixation, but they are technically demanding and associated with vertebral artery injuries. Recently, C2 translaminar screws have been added to the armamentarium of the pediatric spine surgeon as a technically simple and biomechanically efficient method of fixation. However, subaxial translaminar screws have not been described in the pediatric population. We describe our experience with axial and subaxial translaminar screws in 7 pediatric patients.
METHODS: Seven pediatric patients with the diagnosis of upper cervical spinal instability required surgical fixation (age, 19 months-14 years; sex, 4 boys and 3 girls; follow-up, 4-21 months; etiology, trauma [3 patients], os odontoideum/os terminale [2 patients], hypoplastic dens [2 patients]). All patients underwent axial and/or subaxial translaminar screw insertion. Iliac crest bone graft was used for fusion in 4 patients; bone morphogenic protein and cancellous morselized allograft was used for fusion in 3 patients. A rigid cervical collar was applied for 12 weeks postoperatively in all cases. No intraoperative image guidance was used for insertion of the translaminar screws.
RESULTS: All patients had a postoperative computed tomographic scan. Two patients underwent placement of bilateral crossing C2 translaminar screws. Two patients had subaxial translaminar screw placement at C3 and the upper thoracic spine, respectively. Hybrid constructs (a C2 translaminar screw combined with a C2 pars screw) were incorporated in 3 patients. No patients were found to have a breach of the ventral laminar cortex. All patients achieved solid fusion. One patient had a perioperative complication: prolonged dysphagia probably related to C1 lateral mass screw insertion rather than C2 translaminar screw placement.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this report represents the only series of pediatric patients treated with axial and subaxial translaminar screws. This series shows that axial and subaxial translaminar screw fixation is a viable option for upper cervical spinal fusion in children. The technique is safe and results in adequate fixation with high fusion rates and minimal complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19349831     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000338950.46195.9C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Translaminar screw fixation of the cervical spine in Asian population: feasibility and safety consideration based on computerized tomographic measurements.

Authors:  Mohd Imran Yusof; Samir Shamsi Mohammed Shamsi
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Anatomic feasibility of posterior cervical pedicle screw placement in children: computerized tomographic analysis of children under 10 years old.

Authors:  HoJin Lee; Jae Taek Hong; Il Sup Kim; Moon Suk Kim; Jae Hoon Sung; Sang Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-12-31

3.  Rigid variety occiput/C1-C2-C3 internal fixation in pediatric population.

Authors:  Sanjiv Sinha; Anita Jagetia; Aher Rajendra Bhausaheb; Manojkumar V Butte; Rahul Jain
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Congenital subaxial cervical subluxation presenting as a bilateral Erb's palsy: surgical management, rehabilitation, and outcome.

Authors:  Ravi Sankaran; Rohan Shah; Sajesh Menon; Ashok Pillai
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Posterior occipito-axial fixation applied C2 laminar screws for pediatric atlantoaxial instability caused by Down syndrome: Report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kuroki; Shinichiro Kubo; Hideaki Hamanaka; Etsuo Chosa
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

6.  Feasibility of translaminar screw placement in Korean population: morphometric analysis of cervical spine.

Authors:  Gyu Yeul Ji; Chang Hyun Oh; Sang Hyuk Park; Ferry Kurniawan; Junho Lee; Jae Kyun Jeon; Dong Ah Shin; Keung Nyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  The risk of translaminar screw fixation to the transverse foramen of the lower cervical spine: a computed tomography study.

Authors:  Ganggang Kong; Wei Ji; Zucheng Huang; Junhao Liu; Jianting Chen; Qingan Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Dual Approach for the Management of Complex Craniovertebral Junction Abnormalities: Endoscopic Endonasal Odontoidectomy and Posterior Decompression with Fusion.

Authors:  Andrew F Alalade; Elizabeth Ogando-Rivas; Jonathan Forbes; Malte Ottenhausen; Rafael Uribe-Cardenas; Ibrahim Hussain; Prakash Nair; Kurt Lehner; Harminder Singh; Ashutosh Kacker; Vijay K Anand; Roger Hartl; Ali Baaj; Theodore H Schwartz; Jeffrey P Greenfield
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2019-01-24

9.  Posterior Sublaminar Wiring and/or Transarticular Screw Fixation for Reducible Atlantoaxial Instability Secondary to Symptomatic Os Odontoideum: A Neglected Technique?

Authors:  Han Chang; Jong-Beom Park; Byung-Wan Choi; Jong-Won Kang; You-Seung Chun
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-12-07

Review 10.  Biomechanics and Clinical Application of Translaminar Screws Fixation in Spine: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jimmy J Chan; Nicholas Shepard; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.