Literature DB >> 18277868

Modern cervical spine instrumentation in children.

Daniel Hedequist1, Timothy Hresko, Mark Proctor.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of using modern segmental cervical spine instrumentation in children. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the exception of transarticular screws, there are currently no series in the literature looking at the use of modern cervical spine implants in children. In the adult population, these implants have been shown to be biomechanically superior to traditional wiring methods. These constructs may also decrease the need for postoperative halo immobilization, while at the same time improving arthrodesis rates.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 25 pediatric patients greater than 6 years of age treated at our institution with modern segmental instrumentation of the cervical spine. Computed tomography scans were evaluated to determine containment of screws. Radiographic and chart review was done to determine the clinical outcome with respect to fusion and any complications related to surgery.
RESULTS: There were no implant related complications in this series. All screws (n = 112) evaluated by computed tomography scan were fully contained. All patients obtained union and there were no reoperations related to the spinal implants. Complications included: 1 deep infection, 1 superficial infection, and 1 transient radiculopathy.
CONCLUSION: Modern cervical spine instrumentation is safe and feasible to use in children older than 6 years of age. The clinical union rate in our series was 100% with no implant related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18277868     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318163f9cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Rigid segmental cervical spine instrumentation is safe and efficacious in younger children.

Authors:  Ana Mitchell; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Carrie E Bartley; Peter O Newton; Burt Yaszay
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Lateral mass screw fixation in children.

Authors:  Daniel Hedequist; Mark Proctor; Timothy Hresko
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 3.  Modern instrumentation of the pediatric occiput and upper cervical spine: review article.

Authors:  Daniel Hedequist
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-08-12

Review 4.  Modern posterior screw techniques in the pediatric cervical spine.

Authors:  Daniel J Hedequist
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-04-18

5.  Instrumented cervical spinal fusions in children: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  M Lastikka; J Aarnio; I Helenius
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Posterior fusion of the occipital axis in children with upper cervical disorder using both C2 pedicle and laminar screws (C2 hybrid screws).

Authors:  Kenyu Ito; Shiro Imagama; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Mikito Tsushima; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Masayoshi Morozumi; Satoshi Tanaka; Masaaki Machino; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-01-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.