| Literature DB >> 31437188 |
Mariana Araújo Paulo de Medeiros1, Ana Patrícia Vieira de Melo1, Aurélio de Oliveira Bento1, Luanda Bárbara Ferreira Canário de Souza1, Francisco de Assis Bezerra Neto1, Jarmilla Bow-Ltaif Garcia1, Diana Luzia Zuza-Alves1, Elaine Cristina Francisco2, Analy Salles de Azevedo Melo2, Guilherme Maranhão Chaves1.
Abstract
Candidemia has been considered a persistent public health problem with great impact on hospital costs and high mortality. We aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and prognostic factors of candidemia in a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil from January 2011 to December 2016. Demographic and clinical data of patients were retrospectively obtained from medical records and antifungal susceptibility profiling was performed using the broth microdilution method. A total of 68 episodes of candidemia were evaluated. We found an average incidence of 2.23 episodes /1000 admissions and a 30-day mortality rate of 55.9%. The most prevalent species were Candida albicans (35.3%), Candida tropicalis (27.4%), Candida parapsilosis (21.6%) and Candida glabrata (11.8%). Higher mortality rates were observed in cases of candidemia due to C. albicans (61.1%) and C. glabrata (100%), especially when compared to C. parapsilosis (27.3%). Univariate analysis revealed some variables which significantly increased the probability of death: older age (P = 0.022; odds ratio [OR] = 1.041), severe sepsis (P < 0.001; OR = 8.571), septic shock (P = 0.035; OR = 3.792), hypotension (P = 0.003; OR = 9.120), neutrophilia (P = 0.046; OR = 3.080), thrombocytopenia (P = 0.002; OR = 6.800), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.009; OR = 8.167) and greater number of surgeries (P = 0.037; OR = 1.920). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (P = 0.040; OR = 1.055), severe sepsis (P = 0.009; OR = 9.872) and hypotension (P = 0.031; OR = 21.042) were independently associated with worse prognosis. There was no resistance to amphotericin B, micafungin or itraconazole and a low rate of resistance to fluconazole (5.1%). However, 20.5% of the Candida isolates were susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) to fluconazole and 7.7% to itraconazole. In conclusion, our results could assist in the adoption of strategies to stratify patients at higher risk for developing candidemia and worse prognosis, in addition to improve antifungal management.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31437188 PMCID: PMC6705852 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Number of cases and incidence rate of candidemia observed during a 6-year period in a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil.
Fig 230-day mortality rate during a 6-year period (A) and age class distribution (B) of patients with candidemia in a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil.
Demographic characteristics and underlying conditions of patients with candidemia, including comparison between subgroups according to the outcome.
| Characteristics of patients, N (%) | All patients | 30-day outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival | Death | |||
| 27 (39.7) | 10 (33.3) | 17 (44.7) | 0.340 | |
| 56.0 ± 15.5 | 51.0 ± 17.0 | 60 ± 13.2 | ||
| 28 (42.4) | 10 (33.3) | 18 (50.0) | 0.173 | |
| 49 (72.1) | 21 (70.0) | 28 (73.7) | 0.737 | |
| 25 (36.8) | 9 (30.0) | 16 (42.1) | 0.304 | |
| 35 (51.5) | 12 (40.0) | 23 (60.5) | 0.093 | |
| 15 (23.1) | 7 (58.3) | 8 (40.0) | 0.964 | |
| 17 (26.2) | 5 (41.7) | 12 (60.0) | 0.107 | |
| 5 (7.4) | 1 (3.3) | 4 (10.5) | 0.374 | |
| 22 (59.5) | 11 (55.0) | 11 (64.7) | 0.549 | |
| 4 (5.9) | 1 (3.3) | 3 (7.9) | 0.624 | |
Some information was missing in patients' records; therefore the valid N varies according to the variable.
* Student t Test/Mann-Whitney Test (continuous data) or Chi-Square Test/Fisher Exact Test (categorical data).
Antifungal stewardship in patients with candidemia, including comparison between subgroups according to the outcome.
| Characteristics of patients, N (%) | All patients | 30-day outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival | Death | |||
| 11 (16.2) | 4 (13.3) | 7 (18.4) | 0.572 | |
| 41 (61.2) | 20 (69.0) | 21 (55.3) | 0.254 | |
| 5.0 ± 6.0 | 5.8 ± 7.3 | 4.2 ± 4.3 | 0.423 | |
| 28 (68.3) | 13 (65.0) | 15 (71.4) | 0.658 | |
Previous exposure to antifungals was collected from medical records within the preceding 30 days from the candidemia onset (defined as the day of first positive blood culture for Candida species). Some information was missing in patients' records; therefore the valid N varies according to the variable.
* Student t Test/Mann-Whitney Test (continuous data) or Chi-Square Test/Fisher Exact Test (categorical data).
**Timing of antifungal administration: Interval between candidemia onset and initiation of antifungal treatment.
Predisposing factors for Candida bloodstream infection and other characteristics of patients with candidemia, including comparison between subgroups according to the outcome.
| Characteristics of patients, N (%) | All patients | 30-day outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival | Death | |||
| 54 (79.4) | 26 (86.7) | 28 (73.7) | 0.189 | |
| 12 (23.1) | 8 (34.8) | 4 (13.8) | 0.074 | |
| 23 (33.8) | 11 (36.7) | 12 (31.6) | 0.660 | |
| 22 (32.4) | 9 (30.0) | 13 (34.2) | 0.712 | |
| 16 (23.5) | 2 (6.7) | 14 (36.8) | ||
| 19 (27.9) | 9 (30.0) | 10 (26.3) | 0.737 | |
| 66 (97.1) | 29 (96.7) | 37 (97.4) | 0.865 | |
| 3.4 ± 1.6 | 3.0 ± 1.2 | 3.7 ± 1.8 | 0.057 | |
| 62 (92.5) | 25 (86.2) | 37 (97.4) | 0.158 | |
| 38 (55.9) | 17 (56.7) | 21 (55.3) | 0.908 | |
| 4 (5.9) | 3 (10.0) | 1 (2.6) | 0.314 | |
| 5 (7.4) | 2 (6.7) | 3 (7.9) | 0.847 | |
| 19 (27.9) | 10 (33.3) | 9 (23.7) | 0.379 | |
| 38 (55.9) | 20 (66.7) | 18 (47.4) | 0.112 | |
| 2.1 ± 1.4 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 1.7 | 0.105 | |
| 31 (45.6) | 16 (53.3) | 15 (39.5) | 0.255 | |
| 3 (4.4) | 3 (10.0) | 0 | 0.081 | |
Characteristics of patients with unspecified temporal relation or named as “previous” were collected from medical records only within the preceding 30 days from the candidemia onset (defined as the day of first positive blood culture for Candida species), except for data on surgery (collected up to 3 months before candidemia onset). Characteristics of patients named as “post” were collected from medical records up to a 30-day follow-up period from the candidemia onset. Some information was missing in patients' records; therefore the valid N varies according to the variable.
* Student t Test/Mann-Whitney Test (continuous data) or Chi-Square Test/Fisher Exact Test (categorical data).
Clinical condition of patients on candidemia onset, including comparison between subgroups according to the outcome.
| Characteristics of patients, N (%) | All patients | 30-day outcome | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival | Death | ||||
| 53 (77.9) | 20 (66.7) | 33 (86.8) | |||
| 29 (42.6) | 5 (16.7) | 24 (63.2) | |||
| 18 (26.5) | 4 (13.3) | 14 (36.8) | |||
| 29 (44.6) | 16 (53.3) | 13 (37.1) | 0.191 | ||
| 2 (3.3) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (2.9) | 0.936 | ||
| 20 (32.8) | 9 (34.6) | 11 (31.4) | |||
| 39 (63.9) | 16 (61.5) | 23 (65.7) | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.609 | ||
| 21 (32.3) | 10 (35.7) | 11 (29.7) | |||
| 44 (67.7) | 18 (64.3) | 26 (70.3) | |||
| 24 (40.0) | 5 (19.2) | 19 (55.9) | |||
| 19 (31.7) | 9 (34.6) | 10 (29.4) | |||
| 17 (28.3) | 12 (46.2) | 5 (14.7) | |||
| 5 (8.5) | 1 (4.2) | 4 (11.4) | 0.224 | ||
| 20 (33.9) | 11 (45.8) | 9 (25.7) | |||
| 34 (57.6) | 12 (50.0) | 22 (62.9) | |||
| 3 (5.1) | 0 | 3 (8.6) | |||
| 24 (40.7) | 14 (58.3) | 10 (28.6) | |||
| 32 (54.2) | 10 (41.7) | 22 (62.9) | |||
| 18 (30.5) | 7 (29.2) | 11 (31.4) | 0.175 | ||
| 33 (55.9) | 16 (66.7) | 17 (48.6) | |||
| 8 (13.6) | 1 (4.2) | 7 (20.0) | |||
| 55 (91.7) | 23 (92.0) | 32 (91.4) | 0.937 | ||
| 27 (46.6) | 5 (21.7) | 22 (62.9) | |||
| 28 (48.3) | 17 (73.9) | 11 (31.4) | |||
| 3 (5.2) | 1 (4.3) | 2 (5.7) | |||
Candidemia onset was defined as the day of first positive blood culture for Candida species. Some information was missing in patients' records; therefore the valid N varies according to the variable.
* Student t Test/Mann-Whitney Test (continuous data) or Chi-Square Test/Fisher Exact Test (categorical data).
Fig 3Outcome of candidemia according to the Candida species in a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil.
* Chi- square (X2) test.
Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for 30-day mortality.
| Characteristics of patients | Univariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | ||
| 1.041 | 1.006–1.078 | ||
| 0.053 | 3.300 | 0.985–11.052 | |
| 8.571 | 2.675–27.470 | ||
| 3.792 | 1.095–13.129 | ||
| 9.120 | 2.172–38.296 | ||
| 3.080 | 1.022–9.284 | ||
| 6.800 | 1.983–23.314 | ||
| 0.308 | 0.477 | 0.115–1.976 | |
| 0.085 | 0.239 | 0.047–1.219 | |
| 0.999 | - | - | |
| 0.083 | 0.300 | 0.077–1.169 | |
| 8.167 | 1.684–39.598 | ||
| 0.064 | 1.393 | 0.981–1.978 | |
| 0.114 | 0.450 | 0.167–1.212 | |
| 1.920 | 1.041–3.544 | ||
| 0.999 | - | - | |
| 0.095 | 2.300 | 0.865–6.117 | |
| 0.113 | 2.609 | 0.796–8.550 | |
CI: confidence interval; CVC: central venous catheter; MV: mechanical ventilation.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for 30-day mortality.
| Characteristics of patients | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | ||
| 1.055 | 1.003–1.110 | ||
| 9.872 | 1.776–54.880 | ||
| 0.558 | 0.451 | 0.032–6.462 | |
| 21.042 | 1.318–336.004 | ||
| 0.353 | 2.613 | 0.344–19.869 | |
* X2(7) = 30.466; P < 0.001; R2 Nagelkerke = 0.540; Hosmer-Lemeshow Test P = 0.263; Specificity = 76.9%; Sensitivity = 84.8%; Accuracy = 81.4%. CI: confidence interval; MV: mechanical ventilation.
Antifungal susceptibility test results for Candida spp. isolates.
| Species / Antifungal agent | MIC (μg/ml) | Resistance | S-DD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | |||
| 0.06–1.0 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 0 | - | |
| 0.125–64.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2 (5.1) | 8 (20.5) | |
| <0.03–0.25 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0 | 3 (7.7) | |
| <0.015–1.0 | <0.015 | 0.03 | 0 | - | |
| 0.125–1.0 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0 | - | |
| 0.125–4.0 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 0 | 2 (15.4) | |
| 0.03–0.25 | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0 | 2 (15.4) | |
| <0.015–0.06 | <0.015 | 0.03 | 0 | - | |
| 0.06–1.0 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 0 | - | |
| 0.5–4.0 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 0 | 2 (16.7) | |
| 0.03–0.125 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0 | 1 (8.3) | |
| <0.015–0.06 | <0.015 | 0.03 | 0 | - | |
| 0.125–1.0 | 0.5 | - | 0 | - | |
| 0.125–16.0 | 0.5 | - | 1 (11.1) | 0 | |
| <0.03–0.03 | <0.03 | - | 0 | 0 | |
| <0.015–1.0 | 0.03 | - | 0 | - | |
| 0.06–1.0 | 0.25 | - | 0 | - | |
| 0.5–64.0 | 1.0 | - | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | |
| 0.03–0.06 | 0.03 | - | 0 | 0 | |
| <0.015–0.06 | <0.015 | - | 0 | - | |
MIC: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration. MIC50 and MIC90: MIC required to inhibit 50% and 90% of the isolates, respectively. S-DD: Susceptible-Dose Dependent. Resistance breakpoints: fluconazole: MIC of ≥8 μg/ml; ≥64 μg/ml for C. glabrata; itraconazole: ≥1 μg/ml; amphotericin B: ≥2 μg/ml; micafungin: ≥1 μg/ml; ≥8 μg/ml for C. parapsilosis; ≥0.25 μg/ml for C. glabrata. S-DD breakpoints: fluconazole: MIC of 4 μg/ml; ≤32 μg/ml for C. glabrata; itraconazole: 0.25–0.5 μg/ml.