Literature DB >> 31436446

Testing the efficacy of motivational strategies, empathic reflections, and lifelike features in a computerized intervention for alcohol use: A factorial trial.

Emily R Grekin1, Jessica R Beatty2, Lucy McGoron2, Kari C Kugler3, Jennifer B McClure4, Damaris E Pop1, Steven J Ondersma2.   

Abstract

Although computer delivered brief interventions (CDBIs) have been effective in reducing alcohol use, few studies have examined which components of CDBIs are most associated with drinking reductions. The current factorial trial deconstructed a brief alcohol intervention into component parts to identify main and interaction effects on drinking outcomes. Participants (N = 352) were randomly assigned to 1 of 16 possible combinations of four dichotomous (present vs. absent) CDBI components for which theoretical and empirical support was available: empathic reflections, motivational strategies, a spoken voice, and an animated narrator. We measured main and interaction effects of these components on the primary outcome of self-reported mean drinks per day at 1- and 3-month follow-up, as well as on secondary outcomes, including binge drinking, intentions to reduce drinking, and alcohol consequences. Participants reduced drinking across all alcohol use indices over the 3-month assessment period. These effects were stronger for participants who were exposed to motivational strategies, F = 7.7, p < .001. Empathic reflections, use of a spoken voice, and use of an animated narrator were not associated with reductions in alcohol use, either as main effects or in interaction with other factors. Results suggest that CDBIs using motivational strategies are effective in reducing alcohol use. However, empathic reflections and lifelike characteristics (e.g., narrator, voice) may operate differently in CDBIs than they do in person-delivered interventions. More research is needed to better understand how these (or other factors) may influence efficacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31436446      PMCID: PMC6742543          DOI: 10.1037/adb0000502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  34 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Eirini I Vasilaki; Steven G Hosier; W Miles Cox
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 2.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Jessica M Cronce
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students.

Authors:  Patricia Juárez; Scott T Walters; Mikyta Daugherty; Christopher Radi
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2006

4.  Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: the brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire.

Authors:  Christopher W Kahler; David R Strong; Jennifer P Read
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  A randomized controlled trial of an emergency department-based interactive computer program to prevent alcohol misuse among injured adolescents.

Authors:  Ronald F Maio; Jean T Shope; Frederic C Blow; Mary Ann Gregor; Jennifer S Zakrajsek; James E Weber; Michele M Nypaver
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Michael P Carey; Stephen A Maisto; James M Henson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2006-10

7.  Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention.

Authors:  Clayton Neighbors; Mary E Larimer; Melissa A Lewis
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-06

8.  Validation of the 30-day version of the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire for use in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Christopher W Kahler; John Hustad; Nancy P Barnett; David R Strong; Brian Borsari
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.

Authors:  James G Murphy; Trisha A Benson; Rudy E Vuchinich; Mary M Deskins; David Eakin; Amanda M Flood; Meghan E McDevitt-Murphy; Ohiana Torrealday
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2004-03

10.  Personal relationships with an intelligent interactive telephone health behavior advisor system: a multimethod study using surveys and ethnographic interviews.

Authors:  Bonnie Kaplan; Ramesh Farzanfar; Robert H Friedman
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.046

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Alcohol, Drinking Pattern, and Chronic Disease.

Authors:  María Barbería-Latasa; Alfredo Gea; Miguel A Martínez-González
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Participant Satisfaction with Computer-Delivered Intervention Components and Its Relation to Alcohol Outcomes.

Authors:  Marina C Fodor; Emily R Grekin; Jessica R Beatty; Lucy McGoron; Steven J Ondersma
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.164

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.