Literature DB >> 31432510

Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.

Mélie Sarreau1,2, Helene Isly3,4, Patrice Poulain3,4, Brigitte Fontaine2, Olivier Morel5,6, Pascal Villemonteix7, Pierre Mares8,9, Eve Mousty8,9, Alain Godard10, Stephanie Ragot11,12,13, Fabrice Pierre1,11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and maternal-neonatal morbidity between balloon catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial took place in seven French hospitals. Inclusion criteria were medical indication for labor induction in pregnant women, ≥37 weeks, with lower segment cesarean section, Bishop score ≤4, no pre-labor rupture of membranes, singleton fetus in cephalic presentation. Women were allocated randomly to induction with a 50-mL balloon catheter for 12 hours or a low-dose oxytocin infusion. Primary outcome was the rate of vaginal birth. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal complications.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 204 women from 26 December 2010 to 31 December 2013: 101 were allocated to receive balloon catheter and 103 to oxytocin. Vaginal birth rate was 50% (n = 51) in the balloon catheter group vs 37% (n = 38) in the oxytocin group (P = 0.050). Maternal and neonatal morbidity did not differ between balloon catheter and oxytocin groups: two uterine dehiscences vs one, one vs four maternal infections, five vs two hemorrhages and 11 vs five neonatal transfers, respectively. Heterogeneity of treatment effect for vaginal delivery was observed across initial Bishop scores. Balloon catheter was more effective for low values of bishop score.
CONCLUSIONS: Balloon catheter tended to be associated with a higher probability of vaginal delivery as compared with low-dose intravenous oxytocin when used for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section and low Bishop score at induction.
© 2019 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balloon catheter; cesarean section; induction of labor; oxytocin; vaginal delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31432510     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  Mechanical Methods for the Induction of Labour After Previous Caesarean Section - An Updated, Evidence-based Review.

Authors:  Werner Rath; Lars Hellmeyer; Panagiotis Tsikouras; Patrick Stelzl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 2.  Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.

Authors:  Nicole Carlson; Jessica Ellis; Katie Page; Alexis Dunn Amore; Julia Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 3.  American College of Nurse-Midwives Clinical Bulletin Number 18: Induction of Labor.

Authors:  Nicole Smith Carlson; Alexis Dunn Amore; Jessica Ann Ellis; Katie Page; Robyn Schafer
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Cohort Study Summary of the Effects of Carboprost Tromethamine Combined with Oxytocin on Infant Outcome, Postpartum Hemorrhage and Uterine Involution of Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Gong; Xiaohui Wu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Effect of Oxytocin Combined with Different Volume of Water Sac in High-Risk Term Pregnancies.

Authors:  Hanna Mi; Na Sun
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Prospective observational study investigating the effectiveness, safety, women's experiences and quality of life at 3 months regarding cervical ripening methods for induction of labor at term-The MATUCOL study protocol.

Authors:  Guillaume Ducarme; Stephanie Martin; Veronique Chesnoy; Lucie Planche; Marie-Pierre Berte; Elodie Netier-Herault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.