| Literature DB >> 31432279 |
Katrina K Ki1,2, Margaret R Passmore3,4, Chris H H Chan5,6, Maximilian V Malfertheiner7, Jonathon P Fanning1, Mahé Bouquet1,2, Jonathan E Millar1,8, John F Fraser1,2, Jacky Y Suen1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving modality used to manage cardiopulmonary failure refractory to conventional medical and surgical therapies. Despite advances in ECMO equipment, bleeding and thrombosis remain significant complications. While the flow rate for ECMO support is well recognized, less is known about the minimum-rate requirements and haemostasis. We investigated the relationship between different ECMO flow rates, and their effect on haemolysis and coagulation.Entities:
Keywords: Coagulation; Critical illness; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Flow rate; Haemolysis; Platelets
Year: 2019 PMID: 31432279 PMCID: PMC6702240 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-019-0264-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of ex-vivo ECMO model setup
Haemostatic parameters by experimental group at selected time points
| High flow (4 L/min) | Low flow (1.5 L/min) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (± SEM) | Baseline | 2HR | 4HR | 6HR | Baseline | 2HR | 4HR | 6HR |
| Full blood examination | ||||||||
| WCC (× 109/L) | 4.7 (0.5) | 4.8 (0.5) | 4.6 (0.4) | 4.8 (0.6) | 4.4 (0.4) | 4.5 (0.4) | 4.4 (0.4) | 4.3 (0.4) |
| Hb (g/L) | 98 (2) | 101 (2) | 99 (3) | 104 (3) | 102 (6) | 103 (6) | 103 (6) | 106 (7) |
| Plt (× 109/L) | 154 (9) | 172 (6) | 170 (6) | 170 (4) | 130 (18) | 131 (16) | 123 (14) | 120 (16) |
n = 5 high flow, n = 4 low flow; Hb haemoglobin, Plt platelet, WCC white cell count
Fig. 2Time-dependent haemolysis with different blood flow regimens. Haemolysis levels were significantly increased over time from baseline to 6 h with both high and low-flow rates. Significant differences also were evident between high- and low-flow at 2, 4 and 6 h. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01 from baseline to 6 h; #p < 0.05 high vs. low flow. n = 5 high flow, n = 4 low flow
Fig. 3Platelet aggregometry function measured at discrete time points. ADP- (a) and TRAP-induced (b) platelet aggregation area under the curve (AUC) was significantly decreased over time from baseline to 6 h with both high and low flow. RISTO-induced platelet aggregation (c) was significantly decreased over time from baseline to 6 h with low flow only. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001 from baseline to 6 h. n = 5 high flow, n = 5 low flow
Fig. 4Measurement of von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers by immunoblotting in whole blood subjected to high and low flow conditions. Representative immunoblot image from two gels run at high flow and low flow (a) with loss of high-molecular-weight (HMW) vWF bands (analysed by densitometry). Data normalized to total vWF for HMW multimers (b) and LMW multimers (c). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01 from baseline to 6 h; #p < 0.05 high vs low flow. n = 5 high flow, n = 4 low flow
Fig. 5Measurement of specialized coagulation markers. Plasma levels of P-selectin (a) were increased over time with both high and low flow. The levels of Protein C (b) were increased with high flow, while d-dimer (c) levels were increased with low flow. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 from baseline to 6 h. n = 5 high flow, n = 5 low flow
Fig. 6The effect of high vs. low flow on HEPTEM and EXTEM parameters. Low flow resulted in a prolonged HEPTEM-CFT (a) with a corresponding decrease in MCF (b). EXTEM-MCF was lower with both high and low flow conditions (c). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 from baseline to 6 h. n = 5 high flow, n = 5 low flow