| Literature DB >> 31429800 |
Eric Y Hayden1, Jennifer Putman1, Stefanie Nunez1, Woo Shik Shin1, Mandavi Oberoi1, Malena Charreton1, Suman Dutta1, Zizheng Li1, Yutaro Komuro1, Mary Teena Joy1, Gal Bitan1,2,3, Allan MacKenzie-Graham1, Lin Jiang1, Jason D Hinman4.
Abstract
Ischemic injury to white matter tracts is increasingly recognized to play a key role in age-related cognitive decline, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Knowledge of the effects of ischemic axonal injury on cortical neurons is limited yet critical to identifying molecular pathways that link neurodegeneration and ischemia. Using a mouse model of subcortical white matter ischemic injury coupled with retrograde neuronal tracing, we employed magnetic affinity cell sorting with fluorescence-activated cell sorting to capture layer-specific cortical neurons and performed RNA-sequencing. With this approach, we identified a role for microtubule reorganization within stroke-injured neurons acting through the regulation of tau. We find that subcortical stroke-injured Layer 5 cortical neurons up-regulate the microtubule affinity-regulating kinase, Mark4, in response to axonal injury. Stroke-induced up-regulation of Mark4 is associated with selective remodeling of the apical dendrite after stroke and the phosphorylation of tau in vivo. In a cell-based tau biosensor assay, Mark4 promotes the aggregation of human tau in vitro. Increased expression of Mark4 after ischemic axonal injury in deep layer cortical neurons provides new evidence for synergism between axonal and neurodegenerative pathologies by priming of tau phosphorylation and aggregation.Entities:
Keywords: Ischemia; Mark4; Stroke; Subcortical stroke; Tau; White matter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31429800 PMCID: PMC6700776 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-019-0783-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Fig. 1MACS-FACS-seq of Layer 5 cortical neurons after subcortical stroke. Schematic representation of workflow to isolate stroke-injured and neighboring uninjured CTIP2+ Layer 5 cortical neurons for RNA-sequencing (a). Retrograde neuronal tracing with fluororuby (FR) within subcortical white matter at the stroke site (white arrow, upper panel, b) and deep layers of overlying cortex (yellow arrow, upper panel, b) 7 days after stroke. CTIP2+ (green) and FR+ (red) Layer 5 cortical neurons overlying stroke (lower panels, b). Enrichment for Layer 5-specific marker genes in MACS-FACS isolated CTIP2+ cortical neurons (average fkpm; n = 5; p < 0.0001 by 2-way ANOVA) (c). Volcano plot of mapped gene sequences between CTIP2+/FR- and CTIP2+/FR+ cortical neurons (d). Gene ontology of differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.1) (e). Dashed line indicates p = 0.05. Scale bars = 500 μm in upper panel and 10 μm in lower panels of b.
Fig. 2Mark4 up-regulation after subcortical stroke in Layer 5 cortical neurons. Image of fluororuby+ labeling in ipsilateral cortex after stroke (arrow) in sections prepared for laser capture microdissection (left, a). Individual fluororuby+ cortical neurons before (upper panel) and after (lower panel) laser capture microdissection (right, a). Graph of qPCR fold expression differences normalized to neurofilament heavy chain (NFH) for cell-type specific marker genes from laser-capture RNA (red) compared to whole brain RNA (black) (b) (p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with adjusted p-value for Fezf2 levels < 0.0001 by Sidak’s correction). Agarose gel of Mark4 PCR product from pooled LCM isolates (lower panel, c). qPCR for Mark4 in laser-captured FR- (L5) or FR+ (FR + L5) Layer 5 cortical neurons (1.3-fold increased expression, confidence interval ± 0.18, n = 4 in L5, n = 8 in FR + L5) (upper panel, c). Mark4 protein expression (green) in fluororuby+ (red) stroke-injured cortical neurons 7 days after stroke (d). Number of Mark4+ cells (bar plots with quartiles) and average intensity of Mark4 expression (AFUs/unit area) in FR- and FR+ cortical neurons after stroke (e) (n = 12, total cells = 240, p = 0.0053 for average Mark4 AFUs per animal by t-test). Mean ± S.E.M. Scale bars = 10 μm
Fig. 3Reduction in dendritic complexity in Layer 5 cortical neurons after subcortical stroke. uDISCO cleared hemisphere of YFP-H+ transgenic mouse at 7 days after stroke with retrograde neuronal labeling using fluororuby (a). Stroke-injured FR+ (red) and neighboring uninjured YFP+ cortical neurons (green) are visible in sensorimotor cortex along with stroke-injured YFP+/FR+ neurons (yellow) (b). Apical dendrite length was measured in pairs of neighboring YFP+/FR- and YFP+/FR+ neurons (c). Graph of apical dendrite length in YFP+/FR+ cortical neurons compared to neighboring YFP+/FR- cortical neurons (d) (n = 3, total cells = 60, p < 0.0001 by paired t-test). Mean ± S.E.M. Scale bars = 300 μm in a, 80 μm in b, 10 μm in c
Fig. 4Mark4 potentiates tau phosphorylation in vivo and aggregation in vitro. Immunolabeling for pTau-Ser262 (purple) in stroke-injured FR+ (red) cells with uninjured NeuN+ cortical neurons (green) (upper panels, a). Immunolabeling for Mark4 (green) and 12E8 (white) in FR+ (red) cells (lower panels, a). Subcortical stroke with retrograde tracing highlighting stroke-injured cortical neurons 7d after stroke (left, b). Cortical tissue overlying stroke enriched for stroke-injured FR+ cells is selectively isolated (middle, b). ECLIA for pTau-Thr231 (pg/mL) in ipsilateral cortex of sham and stroke (b) (n = 8/grp, p = 0.012). Schematic of FRET-based tau biosensor assay used to measure tau aggregation in presence of human Mark4 (upper, c). Representative images of FRET signal induced by tau aggregation in presence of varying concentrations of transfected human Mark4 protein (pM) with or without Mark enzymatic inhibitor (left, c). Tau aggregation quantified by integrated FRET density in tau-biosensor cells in presence of 20 nM of tau repeat domains and increasing concentrations of human Mark4 (1–250 pM) and Mark enzymatic inhibition (10 μM) (right, c) (p < 0.0001 by ANOVA) with specific statistical comparison shown with brackets and p-values. Scale bars = 10 μm (a); 500 μm (b). Mean ± S.E.M