Literature DB >> 31428660

Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes.

Mitch Brinks1, Tosha Zaback2, Dong-Wouk Park2, Randall Joan2, Stephanie K Cramer2, Michael F Chiang2.   

Abstract

In the U.S., the prevalence of blindness is expected to double by 2050 and as many half of those with blinding eye disease are unaware of their diagnosis. Screening for vision health in the community setting may offer a key strategy to address the rising trend avoidable vision loss. However, problems with excessive referrals and low compliance with these referrals (often <50%) undermine the effectiveness of vision screening programs. We investigated the outcomes of a modified vision screening program design. Key modifications were 1) incorporating an on-site ophthalmologist during screening events; and 2) leveraging community partner resources to maximizing benefit to participants. A review of screening outcomes of 4349 particpant examinations from the Casey Eye Institute Outreach Program (CEIO program) from 01/04/2012 to 10/3½016 were analyzed for demographics and disease findings. The burden on participants to comply with referrals was lessened as 97% of participants completed definitive exams. Clinical care was recommended for 924 (21.2%) participants. Nearly four out of five participants (78.8%) were provided care for all of their immediate vision health needs (full exams, refractions, and spectacle ordering). Modifications to vision screening program design may improve their effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community Health; Ophthalmology; Public Health Policy and Practice; avoidable blindness; eye health; preventive eye exams; vision screening

Year:  2018        PMID: 31428660      PMCID: PMC6699783          DOI: 10.1080/2331205X.2018.1560641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogent Med        ISSN: 2331-205X


  10 in total

1.  Burden of undetected and untreated glaucoma in the United States.

Authors:  Yahya Shaikh; Fei Yu; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Causes of visual impairment and common eye problems in Northwest American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Authors:  Steven L Mansberger; Francine C Romero; Nicole H Smith; Chris A Johnson; George A Cioffi; Beth Edmunds; Dongseok Choi; Thomas M Becker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Access to vision care in an urban low-income multiethnic population.

Authors:  Richard S Baker; Mohsen Bazargan; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; José L Calderón
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  Predictive value of screening tests for visually significant eye disease.

Authors:  Laura J Kopplin; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Community screening for eye disease by laypersons: the Hoffberger program.

Authors:  Harry A Quigley; Chan Kee Park; Patricia A Tracey; Irvin P Pollack
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Optimizing Glaucoma Screening in High-Risk Population: Design and 1-Year Findings of the Screening to Prevent (SToP) Glaucoma Study.

Authors:  Di Zhao; Eliseo Guallar; Prateek Gajwani; Bonnielin Swenor; John Crews; Jinan Saaddine; Lucy Mudie; Varshini Varadaraj; David S Friedman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults in the United States: Demographic and Geographic Variations From 2015 to 2050.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Bruce Burkemper; Shuang Wu; Mina Torres; Chunyi Hsu; Farzana Choudhury; Roberta McKean-Cowdin
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Outcomes of a vision screening program for underserved populations in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Sandra D Cassard; Sherill K Williams; Kira Baldonado; Rebecca W O'Brien; Emily W Gower
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.648

9.  Community visual field screening: prevalence of follow-up and factors associated with follow-up of participants with abnormal frequency doubling perimetry technology results.

Authors:  Steven L Mansberger; Beth Edmunds; Chris A Johnson; Kyle J Kent; George A Cioffi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.648

10.  The economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders among the United States population younger than 40 years.

Authors:  John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Charles W Feagan; Wesley L Crouse; Sundar Shrestha; Alex R Kemper; Thomas J Hoerger; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 12.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.