Literature DB >> 28549849

Optimizing Glaucoma Screening in High-Risk Population: Design and 1-Year Findings of the Screening to Prevent (SToP) Glaucoma Study.

Di Zhao1, Eliseo Guallar1, Prateek Gajwani2, Bonnielin Swenor2, John Crews3, Jinan Saaddine3, Lucy Mudie2, Varshini Varadaraj2, David S Friedman4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop, implement, and evaluate a replicable community-based screening intervention designed to improve glaucoma and other eye disease detection and follow-up care in high-risk populations in the United States. We present the design of the study and describe the findings of the first year of the program.
DESIGN: Prospective study to evaluate screening and follow-up.
METHODS: This is an ongoing study to develop an eye screening program using trained personnel to identify individuals with ophthalmic needs, focusing on African Americans ≥50 years of age at multiple inner-city community sites in Baltimore, Maryland. The screening examination uses a sequential referral approach and assesses presenting visual acuity (VA), best-corrected VA, digital fundus imaging, visual field testing, and measurement of intraocular pressure.
RESULTS: We screened 901 individuals between January 2015 and October 2015. Subjects were mostly African Americans (94.9%) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 64.3 (9.9) years. Among them, 356 (39.5%) participants were referred for a definitive eye examination and 107 (11.9%) only needed prescription glasses. The most common reasons for referral were ungradable fundus image (39.3% of those referred), best-corrected VA < 20/40 (14.6%), and ungradable autorefraction (11.8%). Among people referred for definitive examination, 153 (43%) people attended their scheduled examination. The most common diagnoses at the definitive examination were glaucoma and cataract (51% and 40%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of individuals screened required ophthalmic services, particularly those who were older and less well educated. To reach and encourage these individuals to attend screenings and follow-up examinations, programs could develop innovative strategies and approaches.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28549849     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  7 in total

1.  Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes.

Authors:  Mitch Brinks; Tosha Zaback; Dong-Wouk Park; Randall Joan; Stephanie K Cramer; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Cogent Med       Date:  2018-12-18

2.  Glaucoma Patient Knowledge, Perceptions, and Predispositions for Telemedicine.

Authors:  Lindsay A Rhodes; Carrie E Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Christopher A Girkin; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Detection of Intraocular Hypertension during Opportunity Screening (Check-Up Medical Inspections).

Authors:  Gabriel Zeno Munteanu; Zeno Virgiliu Ioan Munteanu; George Roiu; Cristian Marius Daina; Lucia Georgeta Daina; Mihaela Cristina Coroi; Carmen Domnariu; Daniela Carmen Neculoiu; Adrian Sebastian Cotovanu; Dana Badau
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-11

4.  Alabama Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine (AL-SIGHT): Study Design and Methodology.

Authors:  Lindsay A Rhodes; Shilpa Register; Irfan Asif; Gerald McGwin; Jinan Saaddine; Van Thi Ha Nghiem; Cynthia Owsley; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Sustained accuracy improvement in intraocular lens power calculation with the application of quality control circle.

Authors:  Lei Lin; Pingjun Chang; Jialu Xie; Zhangliang Li; Hongfang Zhang; Fan Lu; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  How I do it: The Neuro-Ophthalmological Assessment in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Carlijn D J M Borm; Katarzyna Smilowska; Nienke M de Vries; Bastiaan R Bloem; Thomas Theelen
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program.

Authors:  Patrick C Staropoli; Richard K Lee; Zachary A Kroger; Karina Somohano; Matthew Feldman; Jennifer D Verriotto; Adam Aldahan; Potyra R Rosa; William J Feuer; D Diane Zheng; David J Lee; Byron L Lam
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.