Literature DB >> 31428217

Perceived Message Effectiveness Measures in Tobacco Education Campaigns: A Systematic Review.

Seth M Noar1,2, Trevor Bell1, Dannielle Kelley1, Joshua Barker1, Marco Yzer3.   

Abstract

Target audience ratings of the likely impact of persuasive messages, known as perceived message effectiveness (PME), are commonly used during message development and selection. PME is also used to examine receptivity of messages after they are fully developed or deployed. Despite this, we know little about the conceptual and methodological characteristics of extant PME measures used in the literature. We conducted a systematic review of tobacco education video, print, and audio campaign studies to examine conceptual and methodological characteristics of PME measures. One hundred twenty-six PME measures from 75 studies conducted in 21 countries with more than 61,000 participants were reviewed. Results indicated considerable variability in measures' focus on general perceptions of a message (i.e., message perceptions) versus perceptions of expected message effects (i.e., effects perceptions). Considerable variability was also found on underlying persuasive constructs, use of referents, and referencing of behavior in PME items and measures. We conclude with several recommendations for future research on PME measurement and validation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication scales; measurement; quantitative methods

Year:  2018        PMID: 31428217      PMCID: PMC6699787          DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2018.1483017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Methods Meas        ISSN: 1931-2458


  40 in total

1.  Adult and youth response to the Massachusetts anti-tobacco television campaign.

Authors:  L Biener
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2000-05

2.  The impact of emotional tone, message, and broadcast parameters in youth anti-smoking advertisements.

Authors:  Lois Biener; Ming Ji; Elizabeth A Gilpin; Alison B Albers
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 May-Jun

3.  The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement.

Authors:  Yvonne Terry-McElrath; Melanie Wakefield; Erin Ruel; George I Balch; Sherry Emery; Glen Szczypka; Katherine Clegg-Smith; Brian Flay
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005-03

Review 4.  A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Seth M Noar
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

5.  Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  Thomas L Webb; Paschal Sheeran
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The perceived effectiveness of persuasive messages: questions of structure, referent, and bias.

Authors:  James Price Dillard; Sun Ye
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-03

7.  Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages.

Authors:  Nancy Rhodes; David R Roskos-Ewoldsen; Aimee Edison; Mary Beth Bradford
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Perceived effectiveness of tobacco countermarketing advertisements among young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer; Andrew Hyland; Cheryl Higbee
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

9.  Antismoking advertisements for youths: an independent evaluation of health, counter-industry, and industry approaches.

Authors:  Cornelia Pechmann; Ellen T Reibling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: a comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain.

Authors:  M Wakefield; R Durrant; Y Terry-McElrath; E Ruel; G I Balch; S Anderson; G Szczypka; S Emery; B Flay
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  18 in total

1.  Self-Affirmation Moderates Self-Congruency Effect in Health Messaging.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Xiaoli Nan
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2019-07-04

2.  Perceived effectiveness of added-sugar warning label designs for U.S. restaurant menus: An online randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Desiree M Sigala; Marissa G Hall; Aviva A Musicus; Christina A Roberto; Sarah E Solar; Sili Fan; Sarah Sorscher; DeAnna Nara; Jennifer Falbe
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.637

3.  Developing health and environmental warning messages about red meat: An online experiment.

Authors:  Lindsey Smith Taillie; Carmen E Prestemon; Marissa G Hall; Anna H Grummon; Annamaria Vesely; Lindsay M Jaacks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Perceived Message Effectiveness: Do People Need to Think About Message Effectiveness to Report the Message as Effective?

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Yachao Li
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2022-01-26

5.  Does Perceived Message Effectiveness Predict the Actual Effectiveness of Tobacco Education Messages? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Joshua Barker; Trevor Bell; Marco Yzer
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-11-28

6.  Evaluating the actual and perceived effectiveness of E-cigarette prevention advertisements among adolescents.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Jacob A Rohde; Hannah Prentice-Dunn; Alex Kresovich; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Tool to assess appeal-aversion response to graphic warning labels on cigarette packs among US smokers.

Authors:  Matthew D Stone; Claudiu V Dimofte; David R Strong; Adriana Villasenor; Kim Pulvers; Karen Messer; John P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Responses to pictorial versus text-only cigarillo warnings among a nationally representative sample of US young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Allison J Lazard; Jessica L King; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  A Content Analysis of U.S. Adults' Open-Ended Responses to E-Cigarette Risk Messages.

Authors:  Yachao Li; Bo Yang; Katherine Henderson; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2020-10-30

10.  Misinformation and other elements in HPV vaccine tweets: an experimental comparison.

Authors:  William A Calo; Melissa B Gilkey; Parth D Shah; Anne-Marie Dyer; Marjorie A Margolis; Susan Alton Dailey; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.