Literature DB >> 30482058

Does Perceived Message Effectiveness Predict the Actual Effectiveness of Tobacco Education Messages? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Seth M Noar1,2, Joshua Barker1, Trevor Bell1, Marco Yzer3.   

Abstract

Target audience ratings of the likely impact of persuasive messages, known as perceived message effectiveness (PME), are commonly used in health communication campaigns. However, applications of PME rely on a critical assumption-that is, that PME is a valid indicator of the likely effectiveness of messages. To examine the evidence supporting this assumption, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies in the tobacco education campaigns literature. Six longitudinal studies examining the predictive validity of PME met inclusion criteria. Results indicated that PME ratings were significantly associated with the majority of outcomes studied. In fact, each of the six studies found PME to be associated with at least one outcome, and across the six studies, PME was associated with message recall, conversations about ads, beliefs about smoking and quitting smoking, quit intentions, and cessation behavior. Meta-analyses demonstrated that PME predicted quit intentions (r = .256, p < .001) and cessation behavior (r = .201, p < .001), revealing effects that were small to medium in magnitude. Our results suggest that PME provides some predictive value as to the likely effectiveness of messages, although additional work using different validation designs, with other health behaviors, and among other populations is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30482058      PMCID: PMC6538475          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1547675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  21 in total

1.  Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics.

Authors:  L Biener; G McCallum-Keeler; A L Nyman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The perceived effectiveness of persuasive messages: questions of structure, referent, and bias.

Authors:  James Price Dillard; Sun Ye
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-03

Review 3.  Measurement and Design Heterogeneity in Perceived Message Effectiveness Studies: A Call for Research.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Joshua Barker; Marco Yzer
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2018-09-06

4.  Efficiently and Effectively Evaluating Public Service Announcements: Additional Evidence for the Utility of Perceived Effectiveness.

Authors:  Elisabeth Bigsby; Joseph N Cappella; Holli H Seitz
Journal:  Commun Monogr       Date:  2013-03

5.  Assessing the effectiveness of antismoking television advertisements: do audience ratings of perceived effectiveness predict changes in quitting intentions and smoking behaviours?

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Sarah J Durkin; Melanie A Wakefield; Yoshihisa Kashima
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Developing a Point-of-Sale Health Communication Campaign for Cigarillos and Waterpipe Tobacco.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Allison J Lazard; Elizabeth Orlan; Cynthia K Suerken; Kimberly D Wiseman; Beth A Reboussin; Mark Wolfson; Seth M Noar
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  Talking About Antismoking Campaigns: What Do Smokers Talk About, and How Does Talk Influence Campaign Effectiveness?

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Sarah J Durkin; Melanie A Wakefield; Yoshihisa Kashima
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale.

Authors:  Sabeeh A Baig; Seth M Noar; Nisha C Gottfredson; Marcella H Boynton; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-07-17

9.  Testing messages to reduce smokers' openness to using novel smokeless tobacco products.

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Torsten B Neilands; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Youth's Awareness of and Reactions to The Real Cost National Tobacco Public Education Campaign.

Authors:  Jennifer C Duke; Tesfa N Alexander; Xiaoquan Zhao; Janine C Delahanty; Jane A Allen; Anna J MacMonegle; Matthew C Farrelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  How should sugar-sweetened beverage health warnings be designed? A randomized experiment.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Marissa G Hall; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Storybooks About Healthy Beverage Consumption: Effects in an Online Randomized Experiment With Parents.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Rebeccah L Sokol; Dina Goodman; Christina A Hecht; Meg Salvia; Aviva A Musicus; Anisha I Patel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Effectiveness of Mental Health Warnings on Tobacco Packaging in People With and Without Common Mental Health Conditions: An Online Randomised Experiment.

Authors:  Katherine Sawyer; Chloe Burke; Ronnie Long Yee Ng; Tom P Freeman; Sally Adams; Gemma Taylor
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.435

4.  Influence of the San Francisco, CA, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning on Consumer Reactions: Implications for Equity from a Randomized Experiment.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Alexandria E Reimold; Marissa G Hall
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.234

5.  An Efficient Message Evaluation Protocol: Two Empirical Analyses on Positional Effects and Optimal Sample Size.

Authors:  Minji Kim; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-09-21

6.  Responses to pictorial versus text-only cigarillo warnings among a nationally representative sample of US young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Allison J Lazard; Jessica L King; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  A Content Analysis of U.S. Adults' Open-Ended Responses to E-Cigarette Risk Messages.

Authors:  Yachao Li; Bo Yang; Katherine Henderson; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2020-10-30

8.  Understanding Motivation to Adhere to Guidelines for Alcohol Intake, Physical Activity, and Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among U.K. University Students.

Authors:  Richard O de Visser; Dominic Conroy; Emma Davies; Richard Cooke
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2021-02-16

9.  Awareness of and reactions to health and environmental harms of red meat among parents in the United States.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Dina Goodman; Lindsay M Jaacks; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Christina A Chauvenet; Meg G Salvia; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Waterpipe Tobacco Warnings: An Experimental Study Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Young Adults.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Allison J Lazard; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.