Literature DB >> 12878778

Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: a comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain.

M Wakefield1, R Durrant, Y Terry-McElrath, E Ruel, G I Balch, S Anderson, G Szczypka, S Emery, B Flay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the similarity in how youth in the United States, Australia, and Britain appraise anti-smoking advertisements with different characteristics.
DESIGN: Each participant viewed and evaluated a set of 10 anti-smoking adverts (from an overall total of 50 adverts) in a controlled experimental context using an audience response methodology. A structured telephone interview was completed one week after viewing the adverts, in which recall and engagement with the adverts by participants was evaluated.
SUBJECTS: 615 youths who were experimenting with smoking or were susceptible nonsmokers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of advert appraisal and engagement.
RESULTS: Youth in the United States, Australia, and Britain responded in very similar ways to the same anti-smoking advertisements. In full multivariate models, the target audience of the advert and the advert theme were not related to the main outcome measures employed in this study. However, adverts with visceral negative or personal testimonial executional characteristics were appraised more positively by youths and were more likely to be recalled, thought about, and discussed at follow up one week later.
CONCLUSIONS: Youths in three different countries responded to anti-smoking advertisements in very similar ways, suggesting that such adverts might be more actively shared among nations. The appraisal of, and engagement with, the anti-smoking adverts, however, varied substantially depending on executional characteristics. In the design of effective anti-smoking adverts, due attention needs to be paid to those characteristics that appear to most engage youth across different social and cultural environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878778      PMCID: PMC1766098          DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_2.ii82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  22 in total

1.  The impact of anti-tobacco industry prevention messages in tobacco producing regions: evidence from the US truth campaign.

Authors:  J F Thrasher; J Niederdeppe; M C Farrelly; K C Davis; K M Ribisl; M L Haviland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Responses to Tobacco Smoking-Related Health Messages in Young People With Recent-Onset Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Coletti; Mary Brunette; Majnu John; John M Kane; Anil K Malhotra; Delbert G Robinson
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Trends in recall and appraisal of anti-smoking advertising among American youth: national survey results, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Lloyd D Johnston; Yvonne M Terry-McEllrath; Patrick M O'Malley; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-03

4.  Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: a propensity-modeling approach.

Authors:  Scott P Novak; Sean F Reardon; Stephen W Raudenbush; Stephen L Buka
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The meanings and context of smoking among Mexican university students.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Mararet E Bentley
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Turning negative into positive: public health mass media campaigns and negative advertising.

Authors:  D E Apollonio; R E Malone
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2008-10-23

7.  Examining the relationship between psychosocial and behavioral proxies for future consumption behavior: self-reported impact and bidding behavior in an experimental auction study on cigarette labeling.

Authors:  Matthew C Rousu; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-01-07

8.  Perceived Message Effectiveness Measures in Tobacco Education Campaigns: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Trevor Bell; Dannielle Kelley; Joshua Barker; Marco Yzer
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2018-07-06

9.  How broadcast volume and emotional content affect youth recall of anti-tobacco advertising.

Authors:  Lois Biener; Melanie Wakefield; Cecilia M Shiner; Michael Siegel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Recall of anti-tobacco advertisements and effects on quitting behavior: results from the California smokers cohort.

Authors:  Eric C Leas; Mark G Myers; David R Strong; C Richard Hofstetter; Wael K Al-Delaimy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.