Literature DB >> 31425811

Comparison of machine learning classifiers for differentiation of grade 1 from higher gradings in meningioma: A multicenter radiomics study.

Gordian Hamerla1, Hans-Jonas Meyer2, Stefan Schob3, Daniel T Ginat4, Ashley Altman4, Tchoyoson Lim5, Georg Alexander Gihr6, Diana Horvath-Rizea6, Karl-Titus Hoffmann3, Alexey Surov2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Advanced imaging analysis for the prediction of tumor biology and modelling of clinically relevant parameters using computed imaging features is part of the emerging field of radiomics research. Here we test the hypothesis that a machine learning approach can distinguish grade 1 from higher gradings in meningioma patients using radiomics features derived from a heterogenous multicenter dataset of multi-paramedic MRI.
METHODS: A total of 138 patients from 5 international centers that underwent MRI prior to surgical resection of intracranial meningiomas were included. Segmentation was performed manually on co-registered multi-parametric MR images using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, T1-weighted (T1), post-contrast T1-weighted (T1c), subtraction maps (Sub, T1c - T1), T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2-weighted (T2) images. Feature selection was performed and using cross-validation to separate training from testing data, four machine learning classifiers were scored on combinations of MRI modalities: random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP).
RESULTS: The best AUC of 0.97 (1.0 and 0.97 for sensitivity and specificity) was observed for the combination of ADC, ADC of the peritumoral edema, T1, T1c, Sub and FLAIR-derived features using only 16 of the 10,914 possible features and XGBoost.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning using radiomics features derived from multi-parametric MRI is capable of high AUC scores with high sensitivity and specificity in classifying meningiomas between low and higher gradings despite heterogeneous protocols across different centers. Feature selection can be performed effectively even when extracting a large amount of data for radiomics fingerprinting.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature selection; Grading; Machine learning; Meningioma; Multilayer perceptron; Random forest; Support vector machine; XGBoost

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31425811     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  24 in total

1.  MRI radiomics in the prediction of the volumetric response in meningiomas after gamma knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Herwin Speckter; Marko Radulovic; Kire Trivodaliev; Velicko Vranes; Johanna Joaquin; Wenceslao Hernandez; Angel Mota; Jose Bido; Giancarlo Hernandez; Diones Rivera; Luis Suazo; Santiago Valenzuela; Peter Stoeter
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Principal component analysis of texture features for grading of meningioma: not effective from the peritumoral area but effective from the tumor area.

Authors:  Teiji Tominaga; Kei Takase; Naoko Mori; Shunji Mugikura; Toshiki Endo; Hidenori Endo; Yo Oguma; Li Li; Akira Ito; Mika Watanabe; Masayuki Kanamori
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.995

3.  Peritumoral edema correlates with mutational burden in meningiomas.

Authors:  Corey M Gill; Joshua Loewenstern; John W Rutland; Hanane Arib; Margaret Pain; Melissa Umphlett; Yayoi Kinoshita; Russell B McBride; Joshua Bederson; Michael Donovan; Robert Sebra; Mary Fowkes; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Discriminating low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from non-low-grade DCIS or DCIS upgraded to invasive carcinoma: effective texture features on ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Hiroyuki Abe; Shunji Mugikura; Minoru Miyashita; Yu Mori; Yo Oguma; Minami Hirasawa; Satoko Sato; Kei Takase
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.239

5.  Pre-operative MRI Radiomics for the Prediction of Progression and Recurrence in Meningiomas.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Ko; Yang Zhang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Kai-Ting Chang; Tai-Yuan Chen; Sher-Wei Lim; Te-Chang Wu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ugga; Teresa Perillo; Renato Cuocolo; Arnaldo Stanzione; Valeria Romeo; Roberta Green; Valeria Cantoni; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: differentiation using MRI derived first-order texture analysis - a machine learning study.

Authors:  Sarv Priya; Caitlin Ward; Thomas Locke; Neetu Soni; Ravishankar Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa; Varun Monga; Amit Agarwal; Girish Bathla
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-03-03

Review 8.  A Spotlight on the Role of Radiomics and Machine-Learning Applications in the Management of Intracranial Meningiomas: A New Perspective in Neuro-Oncology: A Review.

Authors:  Lara Brunasso; Gianluca Ferini; Lapo Bonosi; Roberta Costanzo; Sofia Musso; Umberto E Benigno; Rosa M Gerardi; Giuseppe R Giammalva; Federica Paolini; Giuseppe E Umana; Francesca Graziano; Gianluca Scalia; Carmelo L Sturiale; Rina Di Bonaventura; Domenico G Iacopino; Rosario Maugeri
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

9.  Evaluation of Multiple Prognostic Factors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Intra-Voxel Incoherent Motions Imaging by Extracting the Histogram Metrics.

Authors:  Gaofeng Shi; Xue Han; Qi Wang; Yan Ding; Hui Liu; Yunfei Zhang; Yongming Dai
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  A radiomics model for preoperative prediction of brain invasion in meningioma non-invasively based on MRI: A multicentre study.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Kuan Yao; Panpan Liu; Zhenyu Liu; Tao Han; Zhiyong Zhao; Yuntai Cao; Guojin Zhang; Junting Zhang; Jie Tian; Junlin Zhou
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.