PURPOSE: This report presents the first investigation of the radiomics value in predicting the meningioma volumetric response to gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS: The retrospective study included 93 meningioma patients imaged by three Tesla MRI. Tumor morphology was quantified by calculating 337 shape, first- and second-order radiomic features from MRI obtained before GKRS. Analysis was performed on original 3D MR images and after their laplacian of gaussian (LoG), logarithm and exponential filtering. The prediction performance was evaluated by Pearson correlation, linear regression and ROC analysis, with meningioma volume change per month as the outcome. RESULTS: Sixty calculated features significantly correlated with the outcome. The feature selection based on LASSO and multivariate regression started from all available 337 radiomic and 12 non-radiomic features. It selected LoG-sigma-1-0-mm-3D_firstorder_InterquartileRange and logarithm_ngtdm_Busyness as the predictively most robust and non-redundant features. The radiomic score based on these two features produced an AUC = 0.81. Adding the non-radiomic karnofsky performance status (KPS) to the score has increased the AUC to 0.88. Low values of the radiomic score defined a homogeneous subgroup of 50 patients with consistent absence (0%) of tumor progression. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a strong association between MRI radiomic features and volumetric meningioma response to radiosurgery. The clinical importance of the early and reliable prediction of meningioma responsiveness to radiosurgery is based on its potential to aid individualized therapy decision making.
PURPOSE: This report presents the first investigation of the radiomics value in predicting the meningioma volumetric response to gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS: The retrospective study included 93 meningioma patients imaged by three Tesla MRI. Tumor morphology was quantified by calculating 337 shape, first- and second-order radiomic features from MRI obtained before GKRS. Analysis was performed on original 3D MR images and after their laplacian of gaussian (LoG), logarithm and exponential filtering. The prediction performance was evaluated by Pearson correlation, linear regression and ROC analysis, with meningioma volume change per month as the outcome. RESULTS: Sixty calculated features significantly correlated with the outcome. The feature selection based on LASSO and multivariate regression started from all available 337 radiomic and 12 non-radiomic features. It selected LoG-sigma-1-0-mm-3D_firstorder_InterquartileRange and logarithm_ngtdm_Busyness as the predictively most robust and non-redundant features. The radiomic score based on these two features produced an AUC = 0.81. Adding the non-radiomic karnofsky performance status (KPS) to the score has increased the AUC to 0.88. Low values of the radiomic score defined a homogeneous subgroup of 50 patients with consistent absence (0%) of tumor progression. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a strong association between MRI radiomic features and volumetric meningioma response to radiosurgery. The clinical importance of the early and reliable prediction of meningioma responsiveness to radiosurgery is based on its potential to aid individualized therapy decision making.
Authors: Nida Fatima; Antonio Meola; Erqi Pollom; Navjot Chaudhary; Scott Soltys; Steven D Chang Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Steven J DiBiase; Young Kwok; Susannah Yovino; Cristan Arena; Shahid Naqvi; Richard Temple; William F Regine; Pradip Amin; Chuanfa Guo; Lawrence S Chin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Leland Rogers; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Thomas J Kaley; Michael McDermott; Jeffrey Raizer; David Schiff; Damien C Weber; Patrick Y Wen; Michael A Vogelbaum Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Antonio Santacroce; Maja Walier; Jean Régis; Roman Liščák; Enrico Motti; Christer Lindquist; Andras Kemeny; Klaus Kitz; Bodo Lippitz; Roberto Martínez Álvarez; Paal-Henning Pedersen; Shoji Yomo; Francesco Lupidi; Karlheinz Dominikus; Philip Blackburn; Thomas Mindermann; Otto Bundschuh; A T C J van Eck; Rolf Fimmers; Gerhard A Horstmann Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Jason P Sheehan; Robert M Starke; Hideyuki Kano; Anthony M Kaufmann; David Mathieu; Fred A Zeiler; Michael West; Samuel T Chao; Gandhi Varma; Veronica L S Chiang; James B Yu; Heyoung L McBride; Peter Nakaji; Emad Youssef; Norissa Honea; Stephen Rush; Douglas Kondziolka; John Y K Lee; Robert L Bailey; Sandeep Kunwar; Paula Petti; L Dade Lunsford Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Robert M Starke; James H Nguyen; Jessica Rainey; Brian J Williams; Jonathan H Sherman; Jesse Savage; Chun Po Yen; Jason P Sheehan Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Corbin A Helis; Ryan T Hughes; Christina K Cramer; Stephen B Tatter; Adrian W Laxton; J Daniel Bourland; Michael T Munley; Michael D Chan Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Jason Sheehan; Stylianos Pikis; Abdurrahman I Islim; Ching-Jen Chen; Adomas Bunevicius; Selcuk Peker; Yavuz Samanci; Ahmed M Nabeel; Wael A Reda; Sameh R Tawadros; Amr M N El-Shehaby; Khaled Abdelkarim; Reem M Emad; Violaine Delabar; David Mathieu; Cheng-Chia Lee; Huai-Che Yang; Roman Liscak; Jaromir Hanuska; Roberto Martinez Alvarez; Dev Patel; Douglas Kondziolka; Nuria Martinez Moreno; Manjul Tripathi; Herwin Speckter; Camilo Albert; Greg N Bowden; Ronald J Benveniste; Lawrence Dade Lunsford; Michael D Jenkinson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 13.029