| Literature DB >> 31423264 |
Sanu K Shaji1, Damu Sunilkumar1, N V Mahalakshmi1, Geetha B Kumar1, Bipin G Nair1.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most malignant types of glioma known for its reduced survival rate and rapid relapse. Previous studies have shown that the expression patterns of different microRNAs (miRNA/miR) play a crucial role in the development and progression of GBM. In order to identify potential miRNA signatures of GBM for prognostic and therapeutic purposes, we downloaded and analyzed two expression data sets from Gene Expression Omnibus profiling miRNA patterns of GBM compared with normal brain tissues. Validated targets of the deregulated miRNAs were identified using MirTarBase, and were mapped to Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins, Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes databases in order to construct interaction networks and identify enriched pathways of target genes. A total of 6 miRNAs were found to be deregulated in both expression datasets studied. Pathway analysis demonstrated that most of the target genes were enriched in signaling cascades connected to cancer development, such as 'Pathways in cancer', 'Focal adhesion' and 'PI3K-Akt signaling pathway'. Of the five target genes that were enriched in the glioblastoma pathway, in the WikiPathway database, both HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase and MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase target genes of hsa-miR-139-5p, were found to be significantly associated with patient survival. The present study may thus form the basis for further exploration of hsa-miR-139-5p, not only as a therapeutic agent, but also as a diagnostic biomarker for GBM as well as a predictive marker for patient survival.Entities:
Keywords: GEO2R; gene expression omnibus; glioblastoma multiforme; microRNA; pathway analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31423264 PMCID: PMC6614686 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Deregulated miRNAs in the datasets. (A) Upregulated miRNAs. A total of 11 and 23 upregulated miRNAs were identified in GSE65626 and GSE25631, respectively. None of the upregulated miRNAs were commonly present in both the datasets. (B) Downregulated miRNAs. A total of 14 and 21 miRNAs were downregulated in GSE65626 and GSE25631, respectively. A total of 6 miRNAs were downregulated in both the datasets analyzed. miRNAs, microRNAs.
Most significantly upregulated and downregulated miRNAs.
| logFC | adj.P.Val | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| miRNA ID | GSE65626 | GSE25631 | GSE65626 | GSE25631 |
| hsa-miR-138-2-3p | −4.983773 | −3.540977 | 0.000943 | 0.001108 |
| hsa-miR-139-3p | −6.720897 | −3.16659 | 0.012132 | 0.009653 |
| hsa-mir-139-5p | −4.09792 | −1.469392 | 0.039613 | 0.025831 |
| hsa-miR-338-5p | −7.989224 | −3.3562 | 0.013202 | 0.001108 |
| hsa-miR-770-5p | −4.504915 | −2.807833 | 0.027344 | 0.039478 |
logFC, log fold change; adj.P.Val, Adjusted P-Value; miRNA/miR, microRNA.
Figure 2.Deregulated miRNAs and their validated targets obtained from MirTarBase. A total of 49 genes were identified as the validated targets of deregulated miRNAs which were mapped to their respective miRNAs and visualized in Cytoscape. Boxes represent miRNAs and ovals represent genes. miRNAs, microRNAs.
Top enriched GO terms.
| A, Cellular component | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GO ID and term | Count | FDR | Genes |
| GO:0005829: cytosol | 22 | 0.008208 | HRAS, ACTC1, NRP1, MCL1, ROCK2, NOB1, ELAVL1, NFKB1, TNFSF13, PDE4D, PRDX3, FOS, SPRY1, NOTCH1, FBXW7, CCND1, JUN, BCL2, IRF1, RHOT1, PIK3CA, RAP1B |
| GO:0005654: nucleoplasm | 20 | 0.010017 | BMI1, MCL1, ZHX2, NOB1, ELAVL1, PPP1R10, NFKB1, TNFSF13, ATR, FOS, SPRY1, NOTCH1, FBXW7, CCND1, OIP5, JUN, IRF1, NR5A2, ERCC2, SMARCA4 |
| GO:0045893: positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated | 10 | 0.009448 | WNT1, FOS, NOTCH1, JUN, IRF1, MEG3, NFKB1, NR5A2, SMARCA4, ERCC2 |
| GO:0034097: response to cytokine | 5 | 0.015699 | FOS, MCL1, JUN, BCL2, CD274 |
| GO:2000811: negative regulation of anoikis | 4 | 0.017246 | NOTCH1, MCL1, BCL2, PIK3CA |
| GO:0043524: negative regulation of neuron apoptotic process | 6 | 0.036615 | HRAS, NRP1, LRP1, JUN, BCL2, PIK3CA |
| GO:0046982: protein heterodimerization activity | 9 | 0.028328 | FOS, NOTCH1, MCL1, JUN, BCL2, VEGFA, ZHX2, NFKB1, TPD52 |
FDR, false discovery rate; GO, Gene Ontology.
Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways of the target genes.
| Term | Count | FDR | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathways in cancer | 14 | 5.10×10−6 | HRAS, ROCK2, MET, NFKB1, LPAR1, IGF1R, WNT1, FOS, CCND1, CXCR4, BCL2, JUN, VEGFA, PIK3CA |
| Focal adhesion | 10 | 2.10×10−4 | IGF1R, HRAS, CCND1, ROCK2, JUN, BCL2, VEGFA, MET, PIK3CA, RAP1B |
| Renal cell carcinoma | 6 | 0.010445 | HRAS, JUN, VEGFA, MET, PIK3CA, RAP1B |
| HTLV–I infection | 9 | 0.014093 | WNT1, FOS, HRAS, CCND1, NRP1, JUN, PIK3CA, NFKB1, ATR |
| PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 10 | 0.015521 | IGF1R, HRAS, CCND1, MCL1, BCL2, VEGFA, MET, PIK3CA, NFKB1, LPAR1 |
| Prolactin signaling pathway | 6 | 0.016156 | FOS, HRAS, CCND1, IRF1, PIK3CA, NFKB1 |
| Proteoglycans in cancer | 8 | 0.026297 | IGF1R, WNT1, HRAS, CCND1, ROCK2, VEGFA, MET, PIK3CA |
| MicroRNAs in cancer | 9 | 0.030795 | BMI1, NOTCH1, HRAS, CCND1, MCL1, BCL2, VEGFA, MET, NFKB1 |
| Hepatitis B | 7 | 0.043312 | FOS, HRAS, CCND1, JUN, BCL2, PIK3CA, NFKB1 |
| Prostate cancer | 6 | 0.046072 | IGF1R, HRAS, CCND1, BCL2, PIK3CA, NFKB1 |
FDR, false discovery rate.
Figure 3.Protein-protein interaction network of deregulated miRNA target genes obtained from the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins database. There are 44 nodes with 136 edges with an average node degree of 6.18. The analysis showed that target genes of deregulated miRNAs are biologically connected with a P-value of 4.62×10−12. miRNA, microRNA.
Figure 4.Only significant module found by MCODE analysis with cut-off criteria of MCODE score >3 and node >4. This module consists of 8 nodes (BCL-2, CCND1, FOS, HRAS, JUN, NFKB1, PIK3CA and VEGFA) and 27 edges, and VEGF is the seed gene in this module with an MCODE score of 6. MCODE, Molecular Complex Detection; CCND1, cyclin D1; FOS, Fos proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit; HRAS, HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase; NFKB1, nuclear factor κB subunit 1; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit α; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A.
Figure 5.Pathway Map of Glioblastoma obtained from Wikipathways using Cytoscape. Targets genes of deregulated miRNAs are highlighted with thick borders. Five targets of downregulated miRNAs; CCND1, IGF1R, PIK3CA, HRAS and MET, found to play an important role in GBM signaling cascades. miRNAs, microRNAs; CCND1, cyclin D1; IGF1R, insulin like growth factor 1 receptor; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit α; HRAS, HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase; MET, MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase.
Figure 6.Survival analysis of target genes in the GBM pathway using an online tool OncoLnc that correlates gene expression data with patient survival from The Cancer Genome Atlas. (A) Survival analysis of HRAS. Elevated expression levels of HRAS is correlated with significant reduction in patient survival (Cox Coefficient=0.155, Log-rank P-value=0.0242). (B) Survival analysis of MET. Higher expression levels of MET associated with lower patient survival (Cox Coefficient=0.136, Log-rank P-value=0.0529). GBM, glioblastoma multiforme; HRAS, HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase; MET, MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase.