Literature DB >> 18356283

Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Kathleen R Lamborn1, W K Alfred Yung, Susan M Chang, Patrick Y Wen, Timothy F Cloughesy, Lisa M DeAngelis, H Ian Robins, Frank S Lieberman, Howard A Fine, Karen L Fink, Larry Junck, Lauren Abrey, Mark R Gilbert, Minesh Mehta, John G Kuhn, Kenneth D Aldape, Janelle Hibberts, Pamela M Peterson, Michael D Prados.   

Abstract

The North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) uses 6-month progression-free survival (6moPFS) as the efficacy end point of therapy trials for adult patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. In this study, we investigated whether progression status at 6 months predicts survival from that time, implying the potential for prolonged survival if progression could be delayed. We also evaluated earlier time points to determine whether the time of progression assessment alters the strength of the prediction. Data were from 596 patient enrollments (159 with grade III gliomas and 437 with grade IV tumors) in NABTC phase II protocols between February 1998 and December 2002. Outcome was assessed statistically using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Median survivals were 39 and 30 weeks for patients with grade III and grade IV tumors, respectively. Twenty-eight percent of patients with grade III and 16% of patients with grade IV tumors had progression-free survival of >26 weeks. Progression status at 9, 18, and 26 weeks predicted survival from those times for patients with grade III or grade IV tumors (p < 0.001 and hazard ratios < 0.5 in all cases). Including KPS, age, number of prior chemotherapies, and response in a multivariate model did not substantively change the results. Progression status at 6 months is a strong predictor of survival, and 6moPFS is a valid end point for trials of therapy for recurrent malignant glioma. Earlier assessments of progression status also predicted survival and may be incorporated in the design of future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18356283      PMCID: PMC2613818          DOI: 10.1215/15228517-2007-062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  5 in total

1.  A design of phase II cancer trials using total and complete response endpoints.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Hua Jin; Kathleen R Lamborn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  E T Wong; K R Hess; M J Gleason; K A Jaeckle; A P Kyritsis; M D Prados; V A Levin; W K Yung
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Paul D Brown; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Betsy R LaPlant; Kurt A Jaeckle
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse.

Authors:  W K Yung; R E Albright; J Olson; R Fredericks; K Fink; M D Prados; M Brada; A Spence; R J Hohl; W Shapiro; M Glantz; H Greenberg; R G Selker; N A Vick; R Rampling; H Friedman; P Phillips; J Bruner; N Yue; D Osoba; S Zaknoen; V A Levin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total
  201 in total

1.  Relation between bevacizumab dose intensity and high-grade glioma survival: a retrospective study in two large cohorts.

Authors:  Veronique Lorgis; Geric Maura; Guillaume Coppa; Kahina Hassani; Luc Taillandier; Bruno Chauffert; Lionel Apetoh; Sylvain Ladoire; François Ghiringhelli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Post progression survival in glioblastoma: where are we?

Authors:  Enrico Franceschi; Mario Ermani; Stefania Bartolini; Marco Bartolotti; Rosalba Poggi; Giovanni Tallini; Gianluca Marucci; Antonio Fioravanti; Alicia Tosoni; Raffaele Agati; Antonella Bacci; Eugenio Pozzati; Luca Morandi; Damiano Balestrini; Claudio Ghimenton; Girolamo Crisi; Alba A Brandes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Intra-arterial delivery of bevacizumab after blood-brain barrier disruption for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: progression-free survival and overall survival.

Authors:  Jan-Karl Burkhardt; Howard Riina; Benjamin J Shin; Paul Christos; Kartik Kesavabhotla; Christoph P Hofstetter; Apostolos John Tsiouris; John A Boockvar
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Phase 1 trial of dasatinib plus erlotinib in adults with recurrent malignant glioma.

Authors:  David A Reardon; James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; Katherine B Peters; Sith Sathornsumetee; Stevie Threatt; John H Sampson; James E Herndon; April Coan; Frances McSherry; Jeremy N Rich; Roger E McLendon; Steven Zhang; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Immunotherapy approaches for malignant glioma from 2007 to 2009.

Authors:  Laura A Johnson; John H Sampson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Evaluation of diffusion parameters as early biomarkers of disease progression in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Inas S Khayal; Mei-Yin C Polley; Llewellyn Jalbert; Adam Elkhaled; Susan M Chang; Soonmee Cha; Nicholas A Butowski; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  CNS Anticancer Drug Discovery and Development Conference White Paper.

Authors:  Victor A Levin; Peter J Tonge; James M Gallo; Marc R Birtwistle; Arvin C Dar; Antonio Iavarone; Patrick J Paddison; Timothy P Heffron; William F Elmquist; Jean E Lachowicz; Ted W Johnson; Forest M White; Joohee Sul; Quentin R Smith; Wang Shen; Jann N Sarkaria; Ramakrishna Samala; Patrick Y Wen; Donald A Berry; Russell C Petter
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Martin Bendszus; Jerrold Boxerman; Daniel Barboriak; Bradley J Erickson; Marion Smits; Sarah J Nelson; Elizabeth Gerstner; Brian Alexander; Gregory Goldmacher; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Vogelbaum; Michael Weller; Evanthia Galanis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Lalitha Shankar; Paula Jacobs; Whitney B Pope; Dewen Yang; Caroline Chung; Michael V Knopp; Soonme Cha; Martin J van den Bent; Susan Chang; W K Al Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  Treatment-related changes in glioblastoma: a review on the controversies in response assessment criteria and the concepts of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse and radionecrosis.

Authors:  P D Delgado-López; E Riñones-Mena; E M Corrales-García
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.