Literature DB >> 31419612

Wearable neuroimaging: Combining and contrasting magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.

Elena Boto1, Zelekha A Seedat2, Niall Holmes2, James Leggett2, Ryan M Hill2, Gillian Roberts2, Vishal Shah3, T Mark Fromhold4, Karen J Mullinger5, Tim M Tierney6, Gareth R Barnes6, Richard Bowtell2, Matthew J Brookes2.   

Abstract

One of the most severe limitations of functional neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), is that participants must maintain a fixed head position during data acquisition. This imposes restrictions on the characteristics of the experimental cohorts that can be scanned and the experimental questions that can be addressed. For these reasons, the use of 'wearable' neuroimaging, in which participants can move freely during scanning, is attractive. The most successful example of wearable neuroimaging is electroencephalography (EEG), which employs lightweight and flexible instrumentation that makes it useable in almost any experimental setting. However, EEG has major technical limitations compared to MEG, and therefore the development of wearable MEG, or hybrid MEG/EEG systems, is a compelling prospect. In this paper, we combine and compare EEG and MEG measurements, the latter made using a new generation of optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs). We show that these new second generation commercial OPMs, can be mounted on the scalp in an 'EEG-like' cap, enabling the acquisition of high fidelity electrophysiological measurements. We show that these sensors can be used in conjunction with conventional EEG electrodes, offering the potential for the development of hybrid MEG/EEG systems. We compare concurrently measured signals, showing that, whilst both modalities offer high quality data in stationary subjects, OPM-MEG measurements are less sensitive to artefacts produced when subjects move. Finally, we show using simulations that OPM-MEG offers a fundamentally better spatial specificity than EEG. The demonstrated technology holds the potential to revolutionise the utility of functional brain imaging, exploiting the flexibility of wearable systems to facilitate hitherto impractical experimental paradigms.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Electroencephalography; MEG; Magnetoencephalography; Optically-pumped magnetometers; Wearable neuroimaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31419612      PMCID: PMC8235152          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  36 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.

Authors:  S Baillet; L Garnero; G Marin; J P Hugonin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.

Authors:  F Babiloni; F Carducci; F Cincotti; C Del Gratta; V Pizzella; G L Romani; P M Rossini; F Tecchio; C Babiloni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.

Authors:  Fabio Babiloni; Claudio Babiloni; Filippo Carducci; Gian Luca Romani; Paolo M Rossini; Leonardo M Angelone; Febo Cincotti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Tao Song; Donald J Hagler; Igor Podgorny; Veikko Jousmaki; Li Cui; Kathleen Gaa; Deborah L Harrington; Anders M Dale; Roland R Lee; Jeff Elman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Poststimulus undershoots in cerebral blood flow and BOLD fMRI responses are modulated by poststimulus neuronal activity.

Authors:  Karen J Mullinger; Stephen D Mayhew; Andrew P Bagshaw; Richard Bowtell; Susan T Francis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Magnetoencephalography: detection of the brain's electrical activity with a superconducting magnetometer.

Authors:  D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A 20-channel magnetoencephalography system based on optically pumped magnetometers.

Authors:  Amir Borna; Tony R Carter; Josh D Goldberg; Anthony P Colombo; Yuan-Yu Jau; Christopher Berry; Jim McKay; Julia Stephen; Michael Weisend; Peter D D Schwindt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  A bi-planar coil system for nulling background magnetic fields in scalp mounted magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Niall Holmes; James Leggett; Elena Boto; Gillian Roberts; Ryan M Hill; Tim M Tierney; Vishal Shah; Gareth R Barnes; Matthew J Brookes; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  13 in total

1.  Connectomics of human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Sepideh Sadaghiani; Matthew J Brookes; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  On-scalp magnetocorticography with optically pumped magnetometers: Simulated performance in resolving simultaneous sources.

Authors:  Allison C Nugent; Amaia Benitez Andonegui; Tom Holroyd; Stephen E Robinson
Journal:  Neuroimage Rep       Date:  2022-04-23

3.  Practical real-time MEG-based neural interfacing with optically pumped magnetometers.

Authors:  Marc M Van Hulle; Richard Bowtell; Matthew J Brookes; Benjamin Wittevrongel; Niall Holmes; Elena Boto; Ryan Hill; Molly Rea; Arno Libert; Elvira Khachatryan
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 4.  Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum?

Authors:  Lau M Andersen; Karim Jerbi; Sarang S Dalal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Investigating real-life emotions in romantic couples: a mobile EEG study.

Authors:  Julian Packheiser; Gesa Berretz; Noemi Rook; Celine Bahr; Lynn Schockenhoff; Onur Güntürkün; Sebastian Ocklenburg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Pragmatic spatial sampling for wearable MEG arrays.

Authors:  Tim M Tierney; Stephanie Mellor; George C O'Neill; Niall Holmes; Elena Boto; Gillian Roberts; Ryan M Hill; James Leggett; Richard Bowtell; Matthew J Brookes; Gareth R Barnes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  An Impending Paradigm Shift in Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Authors:  Sotirios Papadopoulos; James Bonaiuto; Jérémie Mattout
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Muscle Fatigue Revisited - Insights From Optically Pumped Magnetometers.

Authors:  Davide Sometti; Lorenzo Semeia; Sangyeob Baek; Hui Chen; Giulia Righetti; Juergen Dax; Cornelius Kronlage; Milena Kirchgässner; Alyssa Romano; Johanna Heilos; Deborah Staber; Julia Oppold; Thomas Middelmann; Christoph Braun; Philip Broser; Justus Marquetand
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Multi-channel whole-head OPM-MEG: Helmet design and a comparison with a conventional system.

Authors:  Ryan M Hill; Elena Boto; Molly Rea; Niall Holmes; James Leggett; Laurence A Coles; Manolis Papastavrou; Sarah K Everton; Benjamin A E Hunt; Dominic Sims; James Osborne; Vishal Shah; Richard Bowtell; Matthew J Brookes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Optically pumped magnetoencephalography in epilepsy.

Authors:  Umesh Vivekananda; Stephanie Mellor; Tim M Tierney; Niall Holmes; Elena Boto; James Leggett; Gillian Roberts; Ryan M Hill; Vladimir Litvak; Matthew J Brookes; Richard Bowtell; Gareth R Barnes; Matthew C Walker
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 4.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.