Literature DB >> 31417796

(E)-6,6'-(Diazene-1,2-di-yl)bis-(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol) tri-chloro-methane disolvate: a superconjugated ligand.

Muhib Ahmed1, Michael Devereux2, Vickie McKee3,4, Malachy McCann1, A Denise Rooney1.   

Abstract

Phenanthroline ligands are important metal-binding mol-ecules which have been extensively researched for applications in both material science and medicinal chemistry. Azo-benzene and its derivatives have received significant attention because of their ability to be reversibly switched between the E and Z forms and so could have applications in optical memory and logic devices or as mol-ecular machines. Herein we report the formation and crystal structure of a highly unusual novel diazo-diphenanthroline compound, C24H14N6O2·2CHCl3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; diazo; phenanthroline; superconjugated ligand

Year:  2019        PMID: 31417796      PMCID: PMC6690457          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900954X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

The chemical versatility of 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), its substituted derivatives and corresponding metal complexes (Bencini & Lippolis, 2010 ▸) is exemplified by their uses as organic light-emitting diodes (OLED)/electroluminescent display and solid-state lighting materials (Li et al., 2009 ▸), fluorescence mol­ecular probes and imaging agents (Haraga et al., 2018 ▸), ion sensors (Zheng et al., 2012 ▸), solar energy converters (Freitag et al., 2016 ▸), anti-cancer and anti­microbial cytotoxins (McCann et al., 2012 ▸), DNA/RNA binding/cleavage (Kellett et al., 2011 ▸), enzyme inhibitors (Zhu et al., 2015 ▸), biomimetics (Casey et al., 1994 ▸) and catalysts (Lu et al., 2015 ▸). Given the resourcefulness of phenanthrolines, there is a continuing demand for new mol­ecules containing this structural motif. Herein, we detail the preparation and structural characterization of the purple diazo-diphenanthroline compound, (E)-6,6′-(diazene-1,2-di­yl)bis­(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol) (1), which was isolated in low yield from the reaction between 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (phendione) and isonicotinic acid hydrazide (isoniazid). Compound 1 crystallizes with two tri­chloro­methane solvate mol­ecules (1·2CHCl3). The fully conjugated bis-phenanthroline mol­ecule 1 is expected to offer exciting new physical and chemical properties as a stand-alone organic mol­ecule, and it will also birth a plethora of inter­esting metal coordination complexes as a consequence of the dual N,N′-1,10-phenanthroline chelating moieties situated on the opposite ends of the mol­ecule.

Structural commentary

Compound 1·2CHCl3 crystallizes with two mol­ecules of tri­chloro­methane solvate per diazo-diphenanthroline (Fig. 1 ▸). The mol­ecule lies on a centre of symmetry and is essentially planar, the r.m.s. deviation from the plane of the atoms in the ring system is 0.259 Å. The mol­ecules lie parallel to the (5 7 15) or (5 14) planes. There is a hydrogen bond between the alcohol and the diazo linker [O1⋯N2 = 2.540 (3) Å under symmetry operation −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1, Table 1 ▸] and the tri­chloro­methane mol­ecule is oriented by a bifurcated C—H⋯·N inter­action with the phenanthroline moiety [3.219 (3) and 3.136 (4) Å to N1 and N3, respectively]. The carbon atom of the tri­chloro­methane mol­ecule (C21) is 1.045 (3) Å from the mean plane of 1·2CHCl3. There are 40 examples in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.40, update of May 2019; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) showing similar inter­actions between tri­chloro­methane and 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives and the geometry for 1·2CHCl3 is typical of the group [mean Cl3CH⋯·N = 3.18 (5) Å].
Figure 1

Perspective view of 1·2CHCl3 showing the labelling scheme for the asymmetric unit with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are shown as spheres of arbitrary radius and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed red lines.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯N2i 0.88 (3)1.74 (3)2.540 (3)149 (3)
C21—H21⋯N11.002.363.219 (3)143
C21—H21⋯N31.002.333.136 (4)137

Symmetry code: (i) .

The bond lengths indicate some delocalization through the central part of the mol­ecule. The C6—O1and C5—N2 bonds are short [1.318 (3) and 1.376 (3) Å, respectively] and the N=N bond, at 1.316 (4) Å, is significantly longer than in most free diazo mol­ecules [mean of 1.24 (4) Å for 2730 CSD entries].

Supra­molecular features

Fig. 2 ▸ shows the unit-cell packing, the mol­ecules lie parallel to the (5 7 15) or (5 14) planes with a mean inter­planar distance of 3.228 (2) Å (under 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) and the axis of the stack runs parallel to the a axis. The shortest ring centroid–centroid distance is 3.5154 (15) Å between the C6 rings; however, there is a more direct overlap between the diazo group and an imine group in the next layer (ca 3.246 Å between the mid-point of the N=N bond and the mid-point of the C11=N3 bond under symmetry operation 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) (Fig. 3 ▸). The most notable inter­actions between stacks are type 1 R—Cl⋯·Cl—R packing inter­actions (Mukherjee et al., 2014 ▸; Cavallo et al., 2016 ▸), the shortest Cl⋯Cl distance being 3.5353 (11) Å for Cl1⋯·Cl3 under symmetry operation −1 + x, y, z.
Figure 2

Unit-cell packing diagram viewed parallel to the plane of 1·2CHCl3. Hydrogen atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.

Figure 3

Principal inter­molecular inter­actions in 1·2CHCl3. Purple spheres represent ring centroids and orange spheres show bond mid-points; distances in Å.

Database survey

There are three published examples of mol­ecules containing the 2,2′-di­hydroxy­azo­benzene core (Bougueria et al., 2014 ▸; Evangelio et al., 2008 ▸; Schilde et al., 1994 ▸) and all of these are significantly less delocalized than 1·2CHCl3.

Spectroscopy studies of 1 in solution

Compound 1 has a very low solubility in all organic solvents investigated (CH3Cl, CH2Cl2, DMSO, CH3CN and alcohols). UV/vis spectra of 1·2CHCl3 recorded in ethanol, methanol, CHCl3 and CH2Cl2 are given in Fig. 4 ▸. Compound 1 exhibits significant solvatochromism showing a broad band in CHCl3 and CH2Cl2 with λmax at 543 nm. This band undergoes a bathochromic shift and separates into two bands in the alcohols with λmax values at 643 nm and 600 nm in ethanol and at 636 nm and 591 nm in methanol. No accurate measurement of the extinction coefficient could be made as 1 was not fully soluble in the solvents and precipitation from the solvent occurred upon standing. The solubility of 1 was so low that only a very poorly resolved 1H NMR of the compound was obtained in d 4-methanol showing a series of peaks in the region expected for the phenanthroline H-atom signals and no definitive assignments of the peaks could be made. Inter­estingly, 1 was more soluble in strongly acidic solutions due to the protonation of one or more of the N atoms. Compound 1 dissolved in CF3COOD to form a bright-red solution. Six signals are observed in the 1H NMR spectrum in the region associated with the phenanthroline peaks. This finding is consistent with a compound which has a centre of symmetry, as found for the crystal structure, and suggests that at room temperature 1 remains in the E form in this solvent.
Figure 4

UV/vis spectra of 1·2CHCl3 in () CHCl3, (- - - -) ethanol, () CH2Cl2, and (⋯⋯) methanol. The absorbance axis is ×10 for the CHCl3 and CH2Cl2 solutions.

Synthesis and crystallization

The mechanism to form 1 from the reaction mixture is unclear; however, the formation of isonicotinic acid N′-(pyridine-4-carbon­yl)-hydrazide (2) from the mixture is an indication that radical chemistry is occurring. Isoniazid is well known to react to form radical species and these radicals are important in its role as an anti-tuberculosis drug (Timmins et al. 2006 ▸). Significantly one LC–MS study has shown that isoniazid will photo-degrade to form 2 (Fig. 5 ▸) and radical inter­mediates are proposed in its formation (Bhutani, 2007 ▸). Attempts were made to try to favour the formation of 1 using UV irradiation and the radical initiators azobisisobutyro­nitrile and 2,2′-azobis(2-amidino­propane) di­hydro­chloride but these were unsuccessful. However, although the reaction to form 1 was low yielding, attempts to make 1 by reaction of 6-amino-1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol and 6-nitroso-1,10-phenananthrolin-5-ol using known conditions to form diazo compounds (Zhao et al. 2011 ▸) did not form the desired product. Studies are ongoing to improve the yield of the reaction to form 1.
Figure 5

Chemical structure of 2

Phendione (0.210 g, 1.000 mmol) was added to solution of isoniazid (0.137 g, 1.000 mmol) in EtOH (25 cm3). p-Tolouene­sulfonic acid (10%, 0.02 g) was added and the solution refluxed for 6 h. The resulting suspension was filtered whilst hot and the filtrate allowed to stand in the dark overnight. Precipitated yellow (Z)-N′-(6-oxo-1,10-phenanthrolin-5(6H) yl­idene)isonicotinohydrazide (0.263 g, 0.799 mmol, 80%) was filtered off and the bright-orange filtrate was concentrated to ca 10 cm3 using rotary evaporation and then allowed to stand in the dark. Over a period of four weeks, the bright-orange filtrate changed to a dark-green suspension. This mixture was heated to reflux and filtered whilst hot to give a green filtrate (see below) and a dark-purple powder. The powder was dissolved in CHCl3 and allowed to crystallize over several days to produce dark-purple crystals of (E)-6,6′-(diazene-1,2-di­yl)bis­(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol) tri­chloro­meth­ane disolvate (1·2CHCl3) (0.026 g, 0.039 mmol, 6.2% based on isoniazid starting material). Upon leaving the above green filtrate to evaporate further white isonicotinic acid N′-(pyridine-4-carbon­yl)-hydrazide (compound 2) precipitated. The supernatent was deca­nted off and the solid dissolved in hot acetone. This colourless solution was evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator to give 2 (0.015 g, 0.062 mmol, 12.4% based on isoniazid starting material). Compound 1: IR (ATR, cm−1) (1.2CHCl3): 3065, 2108, 1583, 1568, 1500, 1472, 1415, 1338, 1284, 1227, 1162, 1027, 795, 739, 717. 1H NMR (protonated-1) (CF3COOD, 500 MHz): δ 9.60 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), PhenH 9.56 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 9.47 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 9.37 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 8.57 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 8.38 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 4.12 (s, 2H, OH). Elemental analysis calculated for 1·2CHCl3 (C26H16Cl6N6O2, 657.15 g mol−1): C 47.52, H 2.45, N 12.79%; found: C 47.73, H 2.52, N 12.77%. Compound 2 has been previously reported (Quiroga et al., 2008 ▸; Bhutani et al., 2007 ▸) and the characterization data given are consistent with the data recorded in the present study. Compound 2: IR (KBr, cm−1) 3435, 3210, 3045, 1682, 1642, 1546, 1489, 1406, 1299, 838, 751. 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): δ 8.80 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): δ 165.6 (C=O), 150.0 (PyrC), 140.5 (PyrC), 121.8 (PyrC). MS: Calculated m/z for C12H10N4O2: (M + H)+ 243.0877; found: (M + H)+ 243.0882; difference (ppm): 2.15.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The C-bound H atoms were included in calculated positions and treated as riding, with C—H = 0.95–1.00 Å and U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C) for methyl H atoms or 1.2U eq(C) otherwise. The H atom (H1A) bonded to oxygen was located in a difference-Fourier map and its coord­inates were refined with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC24H14N6O2·2CHCl3
M r 657.15
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)5.9406 (7), 18.856 (2), 12.2375 (16)
β (°)96.863 (4)
V3)1361.0 (3)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.67
Crystal size (mm)0.43 × 0.05 × 0.04
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker–Nonius X8 APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2012)
T min, T max 0.657, 0.745
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections18529, 2732, 2068
R int 0.045
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.620
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.044, 0.111, 1.03
No. of reflections2732
No. of parameters184
H-atom treatmentHeteroxyz
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.87, −0.59

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2010 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900954X/jj2213sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900954X/jj2213Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900954X/jj2213Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1937969 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C24H14N6O2·2CHCl3F(000) = 664
Mr = 657.15Dx = 1.604 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.9406 (7) ÅCell parameters from 5155 reflections
b = 18.856 (2) Åθ = 2.7–26.1°
c = 12.2375 (16) ŵ = 0.67 mm1
β = 96.863 (4)°T = 150 K
V = 1361.0 (3) Å3Lath, purple
Z = 20.43 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm
Bruker–Nonius X8 APEXII CCD diffractometer2732 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed-tube2068 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 9.1 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.045
thin–slice ω and φ scansθmax = 26.2°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2012)h = −5→7
Tmin = 0.657, Tmax = 0.745k = −23→23
18529 measured reflectionsl = −15→14
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.111Heteroxyz
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0444P)2 + 1.8407P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2732 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
184 parametersΔρmax = 0.87 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.59 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.3174 (4)0.63628 (11)0.66898 (18)0.0216 (5)
C10.3648 (5)0.69741 (14)0.6234 (2)0.0240 (6)
H10.2699040.7369190.6329100.029*
C20.5456 (5)0.70706 (14)0.5623 (2)0.0255 (6)
H20.5726450.7520540.5314500.031*
C30.6846 (4)0.65044 (14)0.5473 (2)0.0219 (6)
H30.8105160.6560510.5070470.026*
C40.6383 (4)0.58421 (13)0.5923 (2)0.0174 (5)
C50.7702 (4)0.52078 (13)0.5757 (2)0.0177 (5)
N20.9396 (3)0.52817 (11)0.50912 (17)0.0195 (5)
C60.7175 (4)0.45623 (14)0.6231 (2)0.0195 (5)
O10.8303 (3)0.39726 (10)0.61010 (16)0.0246 (4)
H1A0.937 (6)0.4088 (17)0.569 (3)0.037*
C70.5313 (4)0.45226 (13)0.6889 (2)0.0191 (5)
C80.4726 (5)0.38783 (14)0.7366 (2)0.0239 (6)
H80.5547380.3456440.7260500.029*
C90.2948 (5)0.38714 (15)0.7985 (2)0.0274 (6)
H90.2518330.3444740.8317100.033*
C100.1781 (5)0.45015 (15)0.8118 (2)0.0253 (6)
H100.0574330.4491910.8561780.030*
N30.2257 (4)0.51143 (12)0.76615 (18)0.0224 (5)
C110.4006 (4)0.51294 (13)0.7050 (2)0.0182 (5)
C120.4522 (4)0.58002 (13)0.6541 (2)0.0185 (5)
C210.0382 (5)0.64497 (15)0.8784 (2)0.0271 (6)
H210.0875920.6215470.8119210.032*
Cl1−0.23375 (13)0.61485 (6)0.89683 (7)0.0493 (3)
Cl20.03861 (18)0.73803 (4)0.85952 (7)0.0508 (3)
Cl30.23081 (12)0.62261 (4)0.99506 (6)0.0333 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0234 (11)0.0211 (12)0.0208 (12)0.0047 (9)0.0050 (9)−0.0007 (9)
C10.0290 (14)0.0208 (15)0.0229 (14)0.0070 (11)0.0065 (11)−0.0003 (11)
C20.0330 (15)0.0159 (13)0.0279 (15)0.0000 (11)0.0054 (12)0.0012 (11)
C30.0231 (13)0.0216 (14)0.0219 (14)−0.0011 (11)0.0064 (11)−0.0016 (11)
C40.0192 (13)0.0169 (13)0.0160 (12)0.0001 (10)0.0008 (10)−0.0016 (10)
C50.0158 (12)0.0196 (13)0.0169 (13)0.0011 (10)−0.0011 (10)−0.0021 (10)
N20.0180 (11)0.0213 (11)0.0193 (11)0.0023 (8)0.0020 (9)−0.0036 (9)
C60.0192 (13)0.0203 (14)0.0180 (13)0.0023 (10)−0.0011 (10)−0.0020 (10)
O10.0258 (10)0.0197 (10)0.0293 (11)0.0053 (8)0.0072 (8)0.0007 (8)
C70.0212 (13)0.0203 (13)0.0151 (13)0.0003 (10)−0.0007 (10)0.0007 (10)
C80.0277 (14)0.0199 (14)0.0236 (14)0.0023 (11)0.0004 (11)0.0027 (11)
C90.0319 (15)0.0274 (15)0.0230 (14)−0.0046 (12)0.0036 (12)0.0063 (12)
C100.0244 (14)0.0290 (15)0.0236 (14)−0.0027 (11)0.0077 (11)0.0032 (12)
N30.0235 (11)0.0250 (12)0.0190 (11)−0.0009 (9)0.0039 (9)0.0005 (9)
C110.0207 (13)0.0198 (13)0.0141 (12)0.0010 (10)0.0016 (10)−0.0020 (10)
C120.0199 (13)0.0196 (13)0.0156 (13)0.0008 (10)0.0008 (10)−0.0015 (10)
C210.0290 (15)0.0290 (16)0.0242 (15)0.0014 (12)0.0077 (12)−0.0021 (12)
Cl10.0258 (4)0.0875 (7)0.0346 (5)−0.0121 (4)0.0037 (3)−0.0095 (4)
Cl20.0818 (7)0.0295 (4)0.0438 (5)0.0156 (4)0.0196 (5)0.0009 (4)
Cl30.0273 (4)0.0379 (4)0.0339 (4)−0.0051 (3)0.0008 (3)0.0002 (3)
N1—C11.326 (3)O1—H1A0.88 (3)
N1—C121.355 (3)C7—C111.409 (4)
C1—C21.392 (4)C7—C81.409 (4)
C1—H10.9500C8—C91.371 (4)
C2—C31.375 (4)C8—H80.9500
C2—H20.9500C9—C101.395 (4)
C3—C41.405 (4)C9—H90.9500
C3—H30.9500C10—N31.328 (3)
C4—C121.414 (3)C10—H100.9500
C4—C51.457 (3)N3—C111.352 (3)
C5—N21.376 (3)C11—C121.459 (4)
C5—C61.400 (4)C21—Cl11.752 (3)
N2—N2i1.316 (4)C21—Cl21.770 (3)
C6—O11.318 (3)C21—Cl31.771 (3)
C6—C71.446 (4)C21—H211.0000
C1—N1—C12117.7 (2)C8—C7—C6121.2 (2)
N1—C1—C2123.8 (2)C9—C8—C7118.8 (2)
N1—C1—H1118.1C9—C8—H8120.6
C2—C1—H1118.1C7—C8—H8120.6
C3—C2—C1118.9 (3)C8—C9—C10118.9 (3)
C3—C2—H2120.5C8—C9—H9120.6
C1—C2—H2120.5C10—C9—H9120.6
C2—C3—C4119.3 (2)N3—C10—C9123.9 (2)
C2—C3—H3120.3N3—C10—H10118.0
C4—C3—H3120.3C9—C10—H10118.0
C3—C4—C12117.4 (2)C10—N3—C11117.9 (2)
C3—C4—C5122.8 (2)N3—C11—C7122.2 (2)
C12—C4—C5119.8 (2)N3—C11—C12118.0 (2)
N2—C5—C6123.3 (2)C7—C11—C12119.8 (2)
N2—C5—C4116.3 (2)N1—C12—C4122.7 (2)
C6—C5—C4120.4 (2)N1—C12—C11117.6 (2)
N2i—N2—C5118.1 (3)C4—C12—C11119.6 (2)
O1—C6—C5122.8 (2)Cl1—C21—Cl2110.73 (16)
O1—C6—C7117.2 (2)Cl1—C21—Cl3109.64 (15)
C5—C6—C7120.0 (2)Cl2—C21—Cl3109.29 (16)
C6—O1—H1A106 (2)Cl1—C21—H21109.1
C11—C7—C8118.3 (2)Cl2—C21—H21109.1
C11—C7—C6120.4 (2)Cl3—C21—H21109.1
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···N2i0.88 (3)1.74 (3)2.540 (3)149 (3)
C21—H21···N11.002.363.219 (3)143
C21—H21···N31.002.333.136 (4)137
  11 in total

1.  A luminescent lanthanide complex-based anion sensor with electron-donating methoxy groups for monitoring multiple anions in environmental and biological processes.

Authors:  Yuhui Zheng; Chaoliang Tan; Gregor P C Drummen; Qianming Wang
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  LC and LC-MS study of stress decomposition behaviour of isoniazid and establishment of validated stability-indicating assay method.

Authors:  Hemant Bhutani; Saranjit Singh; Sanjay Vir; K K Bhutani; Raj Kumar; Asit K Chakraborti; K C Jindal
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 3.  Mechanisms of action of isoniazid.

Authors:  Graham S Timmins; Vojo Deretic
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Bis-phenanthroline copper(II) phthalate complexes are potent in vitro antitumour agents with 'self-activating' metallo-nuclease and DNA binding properties.

Authors:  Andrew Kellett; Mark O'Connor; Malachy McCann; Mary McNamara; Patrick Lynch; Georgina Rosair; Vickie McKee; Bernie Creaven; Maureen Walsh; Siobhan McClean; Agnieszka Foltyn; Denis O'Shea; Orla Howe; Michael Devereux
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  Halogen bonds in crystal engineering: like hydrogen bonds yet different.

Authors:  Arijit Mukherjee; Srinu Tothadi; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  1-[(E)-2-(5-tert-Butyl-2-hy-droxy-phen-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalen-2-ol.

Authors:  Hassiba Bougueria; Assia Mili; Ali Benosmane; Abd El Kader Bouchoul; Salaheddine Bouaoud
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-01-29

7.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

Review 9.  The Halogen Bond.

Authors:  Gabriella Cavallo; Pierangelo Metrangolo; Roberto Milani; Tullio Pilati; Arri Priimagi; Giuseppe Resnati; Giancarlo Terraneo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.