| Literature DB >> 31417747 |
Xudong Sun1, Junbin Liu1, Ke Zhu1, Jun Hu1, Xiaogang Jiang1, Yande Liu1.
Abstract
Investigations were initiated to develop terahertz (THz) techniques associated with machine learning methods of generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) to rapidly measure benzoic acid (BA) content in wheat flour. The absorption coefficient exhibited a maximum absorption peak at 1.94 THz, which generally increased with the content of BA additive. THz spectra were transformed into orthogonal principal component analysis (PCA) scores as the input vectors of GRNN and BPNN models. The best GRNN model was achieved with three PCA scores and spread value of 0.2. Compared with the BPNN model, GRNN model to powder samples could be considered very successful for quality control of wheat flour with a correlation coefficient of prediction (r p) of 0.85 and root mean square error of prediction of 0.10%. The results suggest that THz technique association with GRNN has a significant potential to quantitatively analyse BA additive in wheat flour.Entities:
Keywords: food additive; machine learning; quantitative analysis; terahertz spectroscopy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31417747 PMCID: PMC6689620 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.The architecture of the GRNN.
Figure 2.The histograms of calibration, validation and test sets.
Statistics of calibration and prediction sets of BA concentration in wheat flour. N, number of samples; s.d., standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation.
| dataset | range (%) | mean (%) | s.d. (%) | CV (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| training | 128 | 0.08–1.14 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 40.00 |
| validation | 32 | 0.12–0.90 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 40.00 |
| test | 10 | 0.23–0.80 | 0.51 | 0.18 | 35.29 |
Figure 3.Absorbance spectra of the mixture, wheat flour and BA samples in the 1.6–2.8 THz frequency region.
Figure 4.Fitting model between characteristic peak and BA concentrations.
Figure 5.The score plots of first and second principal components.
Figure 6.Variance plots for different principal components.
Figure 7.Optimization for number of principal components and smooth factor.
Figure 8.The optimized results of BPNN for number of input vectors and hidden layers.
Figure 9.Comparison of predictive abilities for GRNN and BPNN models.