Literature DB >> 33163553

A Prospective Study of Patterns of Regret in the Year After Hysterectomy.

Roopina Sangha1, Andrew Bossick2,3,4, Wan-Ting K Su2, Chad Coleman2, Neha Chavali1, Ganesa Wegienka2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought to identify patterns of self-reported regret after hysterectomy.
METHODS: Women undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication were recruited in the 2 weeks prior to surgery. Women reported demographics and completed validated questionnaires (Decisional Regret Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity) up to 7 times over the first year postsurgery. Medical records were reviewed for clinical and operative details. Latent class growth mixture models were applied to the repeated regret scores to identify patterns after hysterectomy. Clinical and other participant characteristics were compared across the classes.
RESULTS: Three latent classes were identified among the 459 participants (422 of whom completed questionnaires at 12 months): "High Regret" (7.4%), women with a high regret score at baseline that did not improve over time; "Decreasing Regret" (13.3%), women with high baseline levels of regret but whose regret scores improved over time; and "Least Regret" (79.3%), women with the lowest baseline regret scores that remained low after surgery. These classes did not vary with respect to indication for surgery, clinical characteristics, age, or body mass index. Disproportionately more African American women (adjusted odds ratio: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.01-3.9) were in the "Decreasing Regret" versus "Least Regret" classes. Baseline satisfaction varied between the classes, with the "Least Regret" group having higher baseline satisfaction with their decision. Women with "Decreasing Regret" reported worse financial toxicity associated with surgery versus women in the "Least Regret" class (adjusted odds ratio: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: For some women, decisional regret may worsen after hysterectomy. More often, initial regret lessens over time. Future studies that identify factors strongly associated with self-reported regret could lead to improved counseling about postsurgical expectations.
© 2020 Aurora Health Care, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  financial toxicity; hysterectomy; patient expectations; regret; surgical counseling

Year:  2020        PMID: 33163553      PMCID: PMC7644126     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  16 in total

1.  Regret in cancer-related decisions.

Authors:  Terry Connolly; Jochen Reb
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Psychological outcomes after hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maram Darwish; Evan Atlantis; Tamara Mohamed-Taysir
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Growth Mixture Modeling: A Method for Identifying Differences in Longitudinal Change Among Unobserved Groups.

Authors:  Nilam Ram; Kevin J Grimm
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2009

6.  Validation of a decision regret scale.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A prospective study of 3 years of outcomes after hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy.

Authors:  Cynthia M Farquhar; Sally A Harvey; Yi Yu; Lynn Sadler; Alistair W Stewart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; L M Koonin; R Pokras; L T Strauss; Z Xia; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Patient Perceptions of Planned Organ Removal During Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Zeinab Kassem; Chad M Coleman; Andrew S Bossick; Wan-Ting Su; Roopina Sangha; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2019-01-28

10.  Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST).

Authors:  Jonas A de Souza; Bonnie J Yap; Kristen Wroblewski; Victoria Blinder; Fabiana S Araújo; Fay J Hlubocky; Lauren H Nicholas; Jeremy M O'Connor; Bruce Brockstein; Mark J Ratain; Christopher K Daugherty; David Cella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Zoe S Gan; Daniel S Roberson; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.