| Literature DB >> 31412623 |
Paloma Acosta-Montaño1, Eustolia Rodríguez-Velázquez2,3, Esmeralda Ibarra-López1, Héctor Frayde-Gómez1,4, Jaime Mas-Oliva5, Blanca Delgado-Coello5, Ignacio A Rivero6, Manuel Alatorre-Meda7, Jorge Aguilera6, Lizbeth Guevara-Olaya1, Victor García-González8.
Abstract
Metabolic overload byEntities:
Keywords: fatty acids; insulin secretion; lipopolysaccharides; proteostasis; β-cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31412623 PMCID: PMC6721695 DOI: 10.3390/cells8080884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and saturated fatty acids (SFA) trigger the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway in β-cells, with 16C-pamitic acid (PA) the most lipotoxic. (A) Effect of increasing concentrations of LPS (0.1–1000 ng/mL) on cell viability. (B) Under the same conditions, expression of proteins XBP1s, c-Jun, and ATF6α analyzed by Western blot. (C) Effect of the treatment of saturated PA, stearic acid (SA), myristic acid (MA) and lauric acid (LA) (0–600 µM) on cell viability. (D) Effect of SFA treatment on CHOP expression. Tunicamycin (Tum) was used as a control. (E) Cellular distribution of BODIPY (BDP)-MA probe (green channel) (E), BDP-PA (F) and BDP-SA (G) in β-cells. Bars correspond to 20 μm. In panel B and D, β-actin was used as a loading control. In panel A and C, mean values are presented (n = 6, mean ± SD), * p < 0.0005 with respect to control.
Figure 2BDP-PA probe colocalizes with endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-tracker, and UPR is activated. (A,D) Confocal images of β-cells treated with BDP-PA (green channel). (B,E) Localization of ER-tracker probe (1 μM) (red channel). (C,F) Images corresponding to the merge. Bars correspond to 20 µm. (G) Under increasing concentrations of PA, UPR activation was evaluated through XBP1s activation, as well as the insulin release (H). Mean ± SD are presented (n = 3), * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.005.
Figure 3The combined treatment of LPS and PA potentiate the UPR activation in β-cells. (A) Effect of treatments with LPS and PA on cell viability (n = 6, mean ± SD), * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.001. Confocal images of β-cells treated with BDP-PA (B), Aza-2-BDP (D) and the merge (F). Under the same conditions, β-cells treated with BDP-PA plus LPS (C), Aza-2-BDP plus LPS (E), and the merge (G). Bars correspond to 50 μm. (H) Expression of CHOP, c-Jun, XBP1s, and ATF6α under increasing concentrations of LPS and PA (300 µM). β-actin was used as a loading control. (I,J) Detection of XBP1s by immunocytochemistry in control cells (negative signal). (K,L) Detection of XBP1s on PA-treated cells, positive signal (++) is determined by brown areas.
Figure 4Oleic acid (OA) treatment does not trigger UPR and shows a partial protective role on lipotoxicity induced by PA. (A) MTT assay performed in β-cells exposed to different concentrations of LPS in the presence of 300 µM of PA or OA. (B) Under the same conditions, expression of XBP1s and CHOP. (C,D) Detection of CHOP by immunocytochemistry in control cells (negative signal). (E,F) Immunocytochemistry for CHOP under LPS and PA stimuli, positive signal (+) corresponds to brown areas. (G) Characterization of XBP1s, CHOP and ATF6α under a pre-treatment with fatty acids for 12 h, followed by the next treatment. (H) Under the same conditions, cell viability was characterized. β-actin was used as a loading control. In panel (A) and (H), (n = 6, mean ± SD), **** p < 0.001 with respect to control.
Figure 5Endoplasmic reticulum stress reduces insulin secretion modifying the expression of PMCA1/4 and nuclear complexes. (A) Effect of treatment with PA and Tum on insulin secretion (n = 3, mean ± SD) * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (B) Western blot characterization of PMCA1/4 isoforms. (C) Cellular viability assay, ** p < 0.001 with respect to control (n = 6, mean ± SD). Expression of PMCA1/4 and XBP1s in the presence of (D) PA or (E) SA. (F) Expression of Lamin-B and β-adaptin in nucleus extracts. (G) Evaluation of the complex formed by c-Jun and β-adaptin. β-actin was used as a loading control.
Figure 6Unsaturated fatty acids could regulate the insulin secretion. (A) Quantification of nitrites in the extracellular medium under the incubation with several fatty acids and LPS. (B) Insulin secretion in cells exposed to the same treatments. (C) Western blot of UPR targets, XBP1s, CHOP, BiP and ATF6α. (D) Effect of treatments on metabolic regulation through intracellular quantification of triglycerides and evaluation of SPT. β-actin was used as a loading control. In panels (A) and (B), (n = 3, mean ± SD), * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.001 compared to control.
Figure 7The treatment with unsaturated fatty acids regulates the expression of calcium transporting proteins. (A) Quantification of intracellular [Ca2+] under lipotoxicity conditions. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared to control (n = 3, mean ± SD). (B) Expression of targets PMCA1/4, NCX1 and PMCA3, which are regulated by oleic and palmitoleic acid. (C) Quantitative characterization of the expression of PMCA1/4, the analysis was based on three different experiments. * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.001 compared to control (n = 3, mean ± SD). (D) Validation of antibodies anti-PMCA1/4, anti-PMCA3 and anti-SERCA2 in RIN-m5F cells, liver and brain tissues. (E) Western blot of SERCA2. β-actin was used as a loading control.
Figure 8Stearic acid does not modify the homeostasis of calcium in β-cells. (A) Viability assay experimentation under treatment with different fatty acids. **** p < 0.01 with respect to control (n = 6, mean ± SD). (B) Determination of insulin concentrations in supernatant medium. ** p < 0.05 with respect to control (n = 3, mean ± SD). (C) Expression of targets that regulate the intracellular calcium concentration. β-actin was used as a loading control. Confocal images of β-cells treated with BDP-PA (D), Aza-2-BDP (E) and the merge (F). Under the same conditions, β-cells treated with BDP-SA (G), Aza-2-BDP (H), and the merge (I). Bars correspond to 50 μm.