| Literature DB >> 31412583 |
Balgabay Maikanov1, Raikhan Mustafina1, Laura Auteleyeva1, Jan Wiśniewski2, Krzysztof Anusz2, Tomasz Grenda3, Krzysztof Kwiatek4, Magdalena Goldsztejn4, Magdalena Grabczak4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess occurrence of Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium perfringens in honey samples from Kazakhstan. Analyses were carried out using a set of PCR methods for identification of anaerobic bacteria, and detection of toxin genes of C. botulinum and C. perfringens. Among 197 samples, C. botulinum was noticed in only one (0.5%). The isolated strain of this pathogen showed the presence of the bont/A and ntnh genes. C. perfringens strains were isolated from 18 (9%) samples, and mPCR (multiplex PCR) analysis led to them all being classified as toxin type A with the ability to produce α toxin. Sequence analysis of 16S rDNA genes showed occurrence in 4 samples of other anaerobes related to C. botulinum, which were C. sporogenes and C. beijerinckii strains. C. botulinum prevalence in honey samples from Kazakhstan in comparison to the prevalence in samples collected from the other regions seems to be less. The highest prevalence of Clostridium sp. was noticed in the East Kazakhstan province. Our study is the first survey on BoNT-producing clostridia and C. perfringens prevalence in Kazakh honey.Entities:
Keywords: C. botulinum; C. perfringens; Kazakhstan; honey
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31412583 PMCID: PMC6723067 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11080472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Clostridia isolates from Kazakh honey samples.
| Province | Number of | Number of Isolates Related to | Number of | Total in Provinces (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Kazakhstan | 1 (Buckwheat) | 1 (Herbal) | 4 (Buckwheat), | 11 (48%) |
| Almaty | - | - | - | - |
| Pavlodar | - | - | 2 (Buckwheat), | 4 (17.5%) |
| Akmola | - | 2 (Buckwheat) | 1 (Herbal) | 3 (13%) |
| Kostanay | - | 1 (Buckwheat) | - | 1 (4.5%) |
| Karagandy | - | - | 1 (Herbal) | 1 (4.5%) |
| North Kazakhstan | - | - | 1 (Polyfloral), | 2 (8.5%) |
| Kyzylorda | - | - | 1 (Herbal) | 1 (4.5%) |
| South Kazakhstan | - | - | - | - |
| Zhambyl | - | - | - | - |
| West Kazakhstan | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 1 (4.5%) | 4 (17.5%) | 18 (78%) | 23 (100%) |
Figure 1Prevalence of clostridia in honey samples collected from individual Kazakh provinces. The highest number of isolates was recovered from East Kazakhstan.
Figure 2Prevalence of clostridia by honey type. The highest number of clostridia isolates was detected in buckwheat honey samples.
Occurrence ntnh and bont genes in isolates suspected to be BoNT—producing clostridia.
| Province | Number of Suspected Isolates | Number of Isolates Carrying Particular Genes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| East Kazakhstan | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
| Akmola | 2 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kostanay | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
Occurrence of cpa, cpb, etx, iap, cpe and cpb2 genes in isolates suspected of belongings to C. perfringens species.
| Province | Number of Suspected Isolates | Number of Isolates Carrying Particular Genes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| East Kazakhstan | 9 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pavlodar | 4 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Akmola | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Karagandy | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Kazakhstan | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kyzylorda | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 18 | 18 | - | - | - | - | - |
Sequencing results of 16S rDNA PCR amplicons.
| Isolate | Similar Sequence from GenBank (NCBI) | Sequence ID | % Similarity | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K2 | KY910419.1 | 98% | Akmola province/buckwheat honey | |
| K3 | KU950270.1 | 99% | Akmola province/buckwheat honey | |
| K4 | LC258130.1 | 95% | East Kazakhstan province/herbal honey | |
| K5 | LC258130.1 | 94% | Kostanay province/buckwheat honey |
Honey samples collected from various provinces of Kazakhstan.
| Province | Number of Samples | Honey Type |
|---|---|---|
| East Kazakhstan | 73 (37%) | Acacia (1), Buckwheat (19), Clover (5), Polyfloral (4), Herbal (31), Herbal (Mountain) (2), Milk thistle (1), Oregano (1), Sunflower (7), White acacia (2) |
| Almaty | 33 (17%) | Buckwheat (2), Camel thorn (2), Clover (3), Polyfloral (1), Herbal (14), Herbal (Mountain) (7), Salt marsh aster (1), Sunflower (3) |
| Pavlodar | 23 (12%) | Buckwheat (7), Clover (5), Polyfloral (2), Herbal (5), Sunflower (4) |
| Akmola | 21 (11%) | Buckwheat (4), Clover (3), Polyfloral (2), Herbal (7), Sainfoin (1), Sunflower (2), White acacia (1), Camel thorn (1) |
| Kostanay | 12 (6%) | Buckwheat (2), Clover (1), Polyfloral (2), Herbal (6), Sunflower (1) |
| Karagandy | 12 (6%) | Buckwheat (3), Clover (1), Polyfloral (2), Goldenrod (1), Herbal (3), Milk thistle (1), Thyme (1) |
| North Kazakhstan | 11 (5%) | Blooming Sally (1), Buckwheat (2), Clover (1), Polyfloral (1), Herbal (5), Sunflower (1) |
| Kyzylorda | 8 (4%) | Camel thorn (1), Cuscuta (2), Polyfloral (1), Herbal (3), Licorice (1) |
| South Kazakhstan | 2 (1%) | Clover (1), Polyfloral (1) |
| Zhambyl | 1 (0.5%) | Knapweed (1) |
| West Kazakhstan | 1 (0.5%) | Herbal (1) |
| Total | 197 (100%) | |
Figure 3Number of samples collected from particular provinces of Kazakhstan. The highest number of samples were collected from the East Kazakhstan region where highest intensity agriculture is practiced.
Figure 4Sample numbers of particular honey types. The best represented of them were herbal (75, 38%), buckwheat (39, 20%), clover (20, 10%), sunflower and polyfloral (8%).