Literature DB >> 31412381

The Impact of Patient Interactive Systems on the Management of Pain in an Inpatient Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review.

Raniah N Aldekhyyel1,2, Caitlin J Bakker3, Michael B Pitt4, Genevieve B Melton1,5,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While some published literature exists on the use of interactive patient care systems, the effectiveness of these systems on the management of pain is unclear. To fill this gap in knowledge, we aimed to understand the impact and outcomes of pain management patient interactive systems in an inpatient setting.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted across seven databases, and results were independently screened by two researchers. To extract relevant data, critical appraisal forms were developed and each paper was examined by two experts. Information included patient interactive system category, patient population and number of participants/samples, experiment type, and specific outcome measures.
RESULTS: Out of 58 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 18 were eligible and included in the final qualitative synthesis. Overall, there were two main types of pain management interactive systems within the inpatient setting (standalone systems and integrated platform systems). While systems were diverse especially for integrated platforms, most reported systems were entertainment distraction systems. Reports examined a variety of outcome measures, including changes in patient-reported pain levels, patient engagement, user satisfaction, changes in clinical workflow, and changes in documentation. In the 13 systems measuring pain scores, 12 demonstrated a positive impact on pain level scores.
CONCLUSION: Pain management systems appear to be effective in lowering patient level scores, but research comparing the effectiveness and efficacy of one type of interactive system versus another in the management of pain is needed. While not conclusive, pain management systems integrated with other technology platforms show potentially promising effects with improving patient communication, education, and self-reporting. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31412381      PMCID: PMC6693998          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  54 in total

1.  The benefits of an interactive, individualized online patient pathway for patients undergoing minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Peter M Neary; Robert Sung; Mark Corrigan; Maurice O'Donovan; Ronan A Cahill; H Paul Redmond
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  SOULAGE-TAVIE: development and validation of a virtual nursing intervention to promote self-management of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Géraldine Martorella; José Côté; Manon Choinière
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Usability Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Geriatric ED Pain Treatment.

Authors:  Nicholas Genes; Min Soon Kim; Frederick L Thum; Laura Rivera; Rosemary Beato; Carolyn Song; Jared Soriano; Joseph Kannry; Kevin Baumlin; Ula Hwang
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kingshuk Pal; Sophie V Eastwood; Susan Michie; Andrew J Farmer; Maria L Barnard; Richard Peacock; Bindie Wood; Joni D Inniss; Elizabeth Murray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

5.  Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; William S Shaw
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-03-30

6.  A Mobile Health Application to Track Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgery: Results from a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Matthew M Symer; Jonathan S Abelson; Jeffrey Milsom; Bridget McClure; Heather L Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Implementation of Technology-based Patient Engagement Strategies within Practice-based Research Networks.

Authors:  Beth Careyva; Kyle Shaak; Geoffrey Mills; Melanie Johnson; Samantha Goodrich; Brian Stello; Lorraine S Wallace
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  Pain Documentation: Validation of a Reference Model.

Authors:  Emily Gesner; Sarah A Collins; Roberto Rocha
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

Review 9.  Using technology to engage hospitalised patients in their care: a realist review.

Authors:  Shelley Roberts; Wendy Chaboyer; Ruben Gonzalez; Andrea Marshall
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Using a Bedside Interactive Technology to Solicit and Record Pediatric Pain Reassessments: Parent and Nursing Perspectives on a Novel Workflow.

Authors:  Raniah N Aldekhyyel; Genevieve B Melton; Gretchen Hultman; Michael B Pitt
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2018-05-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinician Acceptance of Order Sets for Pain Management: A Survey in Two Urban Hospitals.

Authors:  Yifan Liu; Haijing Hao; Mohit M Sharma; Yonaka Harris; Jean Scofi; Richard Trepp; Brenna Farmer; Jessica S Ancker; Yiye Zhang
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Construction and Clinical Application Effect of General Surgery Patient-Oriented Nursing Information Platform Using Cloud Computing.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Jingjing Wang; Weiwei Gao; Dongli Yu; Xiaoxia Shou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.