Literature DB >> 20647234

The benefits of an interactive, individualized online patient pathway for patients undergoing minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Peter M Neary1, Robert Sung, Mark Corrigan, Maurice O'Donovan, Ronan A Cahill, H Paul Redmond.   

Abstract

AIM: This study determined the usefulness of an interactive, individualized online patient pathway to patients undergoing elective operation for nonmalignant disease.
METHODS: An exploratory double-blind, prospective randomized controlled trial was established involving consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy (MIRP). A total of 64 patients were randomly assigned to either a standard or an enhanced Web site (interactive with detailed, personalized timeline). Each patient completed validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaires preoperatively and pain assessments and questionnaires concerning Web site usefulness postoperatively.
RESULTS: All patients found their Web site useful, although patient satisfaction was significantly higher with the enhanced Web site in regard to overall impression as well as ease, organization, usefulness, and specificity of information. There were no significant differences in mean anxiety or pain scores, in analgesia requirements, or adequacy of informed consent.
CONCLUSION: Providing education and information through a tailored Web server is viewed positively by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647234     DOI: 10.1177/1553350610374603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  6 in total

1.  Fast-track for the modern colorectal department.

Authors:  Rishabh Sehgal; Arnold Hill; Joseph Deasy; Deborah A McNamara; Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The Impact of Patient Interactive Systems on the Management of Pain in an Inpatient Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Raniah N Aldekhyyel; Caitlin J Bakker; Michael B Pitt; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Substitution of Usual Perioperative Care by eHealth to Enhance Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing General Surgical or Gynecological Procedures: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Eva van der Meij; Judith Af Huirne; Esther Va Bouwsma; Johanna M van Dongen; Caroline B Terwee; Peter M van de Ven; Chantal M den Bakker; Suzan van der Meij; W Marchien van Baal; Wouter Kg Leclercq; Peggy Maj Geomini; Esther Cj Consten; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul Jm van Kesteren; Hein Bac Stockmann; A Dorien Ten Cate; Paul Hp Davids; Petrus C Scholten; Baukje van den Heuvel; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Wilhelmus Jhj Meijerink; H Jaap Bonjer; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 4.  The Effect of Perioperative E-Health Interventions on the Postoperative Course: A Systematic Review of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Eva van der Meij; Johannes R Anema; René H J Otten; Judith A F Huirne; Frederieke G Schaafsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using PROMIS for measuring recovery after abdominal surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Eva van der Meij; Johannes R Anema; Judith A F Huirne; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Rachael Powell; Neil W Scott; Anne Manyande; Julie Bruce; Claus Vögele; Lucie M T Byrne-Davis; Mary Unsworth; Christian Osmer; Marie Johnston
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.