| Literature DB >> 35368952 |
Yuanyuan Chen1, Jingjing Wang2, Weiwei Gao3, Dongli Yu1, Xiaoxia Shou1.
Abstract
The paper aims to build a nursing information platform (NIP) for general surgery (GS) patients and explore its clinical application effect based on cloud computing (CC) technology. Specifically, the present work first analyzes and expounds on the characteristics of GS patients, the CC concept, the three-tier service mode of CC, and the cloud data center (CDC). Secondly, based on the principle of the overall system design, the evaluation indexes of medical care end, patient end, family end, and management end are constructed using Visual Studio 2010. Thirdly, the expert evaluation and user evaluation methods are selected to analyze the clinical application effect of the proposed system. Finally, SPSS is used to analyze the effect of the proposed system. The results of the first and second rounds of the expert evaluation show that the authority coefficient of experts is greater than 0.7, which indicates that the degree of expert authority is good. The proposed CC-based GS patient-oriented NIP system is universal. The evaluation results of 20 users have shown 15 doctors and nurses, 14 patients, and 18 family members, who mostly still support applying the proposed CC-based GS patient-oriented NIP system and believe that the system brings convenience and improves work efficiency. In short, more incentives should be taken to build a NIP for GS patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35368952 PMCID: PMC8975652 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8273701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1CC three-tier service model.
Figure 2Analysis of CC's elements and characteristics.
Figure 3Main features of CDC.
Figure 4Logical architecture diagram of cloud desktop.
Figure 5System business flowchart.
Figure 6System entity relationship diagram.
Figure 7Classical V model.
Key settings of the QS.
| Index | Index content | Feasibility | Importance | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical end | Nurse login, nurse information management, doctor's order copying, doctor's order checking, doctor's order execution, patient query, event report, and quality standard | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Patient end | Patient information exchange, view doctor's orders, event reports, and view relevant health knowledge | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Family end | Participate in the management of patients' surgical nursing services | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Administrator side | Manage and maintain the platform | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Test results of the proposed NIP system.
| Test scenario number | Operation function | Expected output | Test result |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC&MP-1 | Nurse login | Enter the account and password and log in to the system | Pass |
| PC&MP-2 | Nurse information management | Fill in and modify your personal information | Pass |
| PC&MP-3 | Doctor's order copying, doctor's order checking, doctor's order execution | Enter the corresponding page for the corresponding operation | Pass |
| PC&MP-4 | Patient inquiry | Enter the patient query interface, enter the patient number and query the patient information and status | Pass |
| PC&MP-5 | Event report | Open the event report page, fill in the event information and click report | Pass |
| PC&MP-6 | Quality standard | Enter the page, modify the quality standard and click submit | Pass |
Performance test results of the proposed NIP.
| Test scenario number | Operation function | Scene description | Average corresponding time (s) | Test result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC&MP-7 | Nurse login | One user every two seconds, and then run for 15 minutes | 0.062 | Pass |
| PC&MP-8 | Nurse information management | One user every two seconds, and then run for 15 minutes | 0.171 | Pass |
| PC&MP-9 | Doctor's order copying, doctor's order checking, doctor's order execution | One user every two seconds, and then run for 15 minutes | 0.156 | Pass |
| PC&MP-10 | Patient inquiry | One user every two seconds, and then run for 15 minutes | 0.161 | Pass |
| PC&MP-11 | Event report | One user every two seconds, and then run for 15 minutes | 0.108 | Pass |
| PC&MP-12 | Quality standard | One user every two seconds, and then run for 15 minutes | 0.153 | Pass |
Figure 8Expert coordination degree.
Figure 9The first-round expert evaluation results on indexes.
Figure 10The second-round expert evaluation results on indexes.
Figure 11User attitudes.