Literature DB >> 31410410

Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 4: How to Calculate the Sample Size for a Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study based on Sensitivity, Specificity, and the Area Under the ROC Curve.

Ahmed Negida1,2, Nadien Khaled Fahim3, Yasmin Negida1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31410410      PMCID: PMC6683590          DOI: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med        ISSN: 2588-400X


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

In the previous educational articles, we explained how to calculate the sample size for a rate or a single proportion, for an independent cohort study, and for an independent case-control study (1–3). In this article, we will explain how to calculate the sample size for a diagnostic test accuracy study based on sensitivity, specificity, or the area under the ROC curve.

When to use the sample size calculation procedure of diagnostic performance

The methods explained hereafter should be used in the case that the diagnostic performance of your new test (new device, survey, or biomarker) is expressed as sensitivity, specificity, or area under the ROC curve. The definitions of sensitivity, specificity, or area under the ROC curve were explained by us in previous education editorials (4, 5).

• Sample Size Calculation based on sensitivity or specificity

We will use the sample size calculation methods of Buderer et al.1996 (6). In this method, we need first to calculate the TP+FN for sensitivity and the TN+FP for specificity through the following equation. Where Z, the normal distribution value, is set to 1.96 as corresponding with the 95% confidence interval, W, the maximum acceptable width of the 95% confidence interval, is set to 10%, and the expected sensitivity and specificity are defined based on the estimates from previous studies. The next step is to calculate N required for sensitivity and N required for specificity through the following equations: N required for sensitivity N required for specificity

Example: a study to evaluate the accuracy of blood pressure to height ratio as a diagnostic tool for hypertension among adolescents

Assume that we will conduct a study to estimate the accuracy of blood pressure to height ratio as a diagnostic tool for hypertension in adolescents in Egypt. Therefore, we will enroll a group of adolescents including those with hypertension and those without hypertension. Each subject will be screened twice, first time by the gold standard test (reference test), then by the new test (blood pressure to height ratio). A previous similar study reported a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90% while the prevalence rate of hypertension in Egyptian adolescents was 5% (7). To calculate the sample size required for this study, we apply the above-mentioned equations and the results were as follows: TP + FN = 34.5 TN + FP = 34.5 Then, we calculate the N required for sensitivity and the N required for specificity, as follows: N required for sensitivity N required for specificity Total required sample size Therefore, in this study, should include 691 participants with hypertension and 36 participants without hypertension yielding a total sample size of 728 participants. These equations were programmed by a Vietnamese biostatistician into an android app named “statistics and sample size pro”. By providing the same inputs, we obtain similar estimates (Figure 1).
Figure 1:

shows calculating the sensitivity and specificity by an android app

shows calculating the sensitivity and specificity by an android app

• Sample size calculation based on the area under the ROC curve

This will require to provide the following inputs in MedCalc software Expected AUC Null value of the AUC (usually 50% is the null value) Ratio between negative and positive cases

Example: a study to evaluate the accuracy of CSF lactate in discriminating the bacterial meningitis from enteroviral meningitis.

Assume that we will conduct a study to estimate the accuracy of CSF lactate to discriminate bacterial meningitis from enteroviral meningitis. Therefore, we will enroll a group of patients with acute meningitis including those with bacterial meningitis and those with enteroviral meningitis. For each CSF specimen, bacterioscopy, bacterial antigen latex agglutination test and CSF bacterial culture will be performed as a standard test (reference test), then the CSF lactate will be estimated (new test). A previous study by Manomaivat et al. showed that the AUC of CSF lactate was 94% for discriminating bacterial meningitis from enteroviral meningitis (8). The ratio between negative and positive cases was 525/662. In order to calculate the sample size required for our new study, we will provide the inputs to MedCalc software as follows: First, open the software then select “sampling” for sample size calculation options then, select “area under the ROC curve” (Figure 2). Finally, submit the data and check the table for the calculation results. As shown in figure 3, the results table shows a sample size of 11 patients (5 cases of enteroviral meningitis and 6 cases of bacterial meningitis) corresponding with a 5% alpha error and a 10% beta error.
Figure 2:

MedCalc menu

Figure 3:

The results table

MedCalc menu The results table
  8 in total

1.  Evidence Based Emergency Medicine; Part 5 Receiver Operating Curve and Area under the Curve.

Authors:  Saeed Safari; Alireza Baratloo; Mohamed Elfil; Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2016

Review 2.  Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  N M Buderer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Prevalence of elevated blood pressure and association with obesity in egyptian school adolescents.

Authors:  Mostafa A Abolfotouh; Sunny A Sallam; Mohammed S Mohammed; Amany A Loutfy; Ali A Hasab
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.420

4.  Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 1: How to Calculate the Sample Size Based on the Prevalence Rate.

Authors:  Nadien Khaled Fahim; Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-31

5.  Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 3: How to Calculate the Sample Size for an Independent Case-control Study.

Authors:  Nadien Khaled Fahim; Ahmed Negida; Ahmed Khaled Fahim
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-20

6.  Performance of lactate in discriminating bacterial meningitis from enteroviral meningitis.

Authors:  Renan Barros Domingues; Gustavo Bruniera Peres Fernandes; Fernando Brunale Vilela de Moura Leite; Carlos Senne
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 1.846

7.  Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 2: How to Calculate the Sample Size for an Independent Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nadien Khaled Fahim; Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-09-13

8.  Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity.

Authors:  Alireza Baratloo; Mostafa Hosseini; Ahmed Negida; Gehad El Ashal
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015
  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Visualization of Type-1 Macular Neovascularization Secondary to Pachychoroid Spectrum Diseases: A Comparative Study for Sensitivity and Specificity of Indocyanine Green Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Sibel Demirel; Pınar Güran Beğar; Özge Yanık; Figen Batıoğlu; Emin Özmert
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events.

Authors:  Sultan Tuna Akgol Gur; Meryem Betos Kocak; Abdullah Osman Kocak; Mert Vural; Ilker Akbas; Sinem Dogruyol; Bugra Kerget; Zeynep Cakir
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2021-02

3.  Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 5: How to calculate the sample size for a superiority clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Negida; Nadien Khaled Fahim; Yasmin Negida; Hussien Ahmed
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-29

4.  Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as an early predictor for patients with acute paraquat poisoning: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Zong Xun Cao; Ya Qi Song; Wen Jing Bai; Wen Jie Wang; Yong Zhao; Su Li Zhang; Shun Yi Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 7: How to Calculate the Sample Size Based on a Correlation.

Authors:  Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-17

6.  Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 6: How to calculate the sample size for a non-inferiority or an equivalence clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-11-27

7.  Actigraphic Measurement of the Upper Limbs for the Prediction of Ischemic Stroke Prognosis: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Reale; Silvia Giovannini; Chiara Iacovelli; Stefano Filippo Castiglia; Pietro Picerno; Aurelia Zauli; Marco Rabuffetti; Maurizio Ferrarin; Giulio Maccauro; Pietro Caliandro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A re-testing range is recommended for 13C- and 14C-urea breath tests for Helicobacter pylori infection in China.

Authors:  Xiangyu Wang; Shuzhen Zhang; Eng Guan Chua; Yongsheng He; Xiaofeng Li; Aijun Liu; Haiting Chen; Michael J Wise; Barry J Marshall; Dayong Sun; Xuehong Li; Chin Yen Tay
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.181

9.  The Performance of a Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound Device, CM-200, in Stratifying Osteoporosis Risk among Malaysian Population Aged 40 Years and Above.

Authors:  Shaanthana Subramaniam; Chin-Yi Chan; Ima Nirwana Soelaiman; Norazlina Mohamed; Norliza Muhammad; Fairus Ahmad; Pei-Yuen Ng; Nor Aini Jamil; Noorazah Abd Aziz; Kok-Yong Chin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25

10.  Detection of serum IgM and IgG for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Authors:  Ling Zhong; Junlan Chuan; Bo Gong; Ping Shuai; Yu Zhou; Yi Zhang; Zhilin Jiang; Dingding Zhang; Xiaoqi Liu; Shi Ma; Yi Huang; He Lin; Qingwei Wang; Lulin Huang; Dan Jiang; Fang Hao; Juan Tang; Chunqi Zheng; Hua Yu; Zhibin Wang; Qi Jiang; Tao Zeng; Mei Luo; Fanwei Zeng; Fanxin Zeng; Jianghai Liu; Junxi Tian; Yu Xu; Tengxiang Long; Kaiju Xu; Xingxiang Yang; Yuping Liu; Yi Shi; Li Jiang; Zhenglin Yang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 10.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.