Allen S Ho1,2, Michael Luu1,3, Cynthia Zalt1, Luc G T Morris4, Irene Chen1,5, Michelle Melany1,5, Nabilah Ali1,2, Chrysanta Patio1,2, Yufei Chen1,6, Jon Mallen St-Clair1,2, Glenn D Braunstein1,7, Wendy L Sacks1,7, Zachary S Zumsteg1,8. 1. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, California. 2. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 3. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 4. Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Department of Radiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 6. Department of Surgery, and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 7. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
Background: Active surveillance is established as an alternative to surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas, but inclusion criteria and mortality risk for pursuing a nonsurgical approach have not been clearly defined. To gauge the feasibility of expanding active surveillance thresholds, we investigated the effects of increasing size and age on disease-specific survival (DSS) in a large nonoperative thyroid cancer cohort, compared against a matched group of surgical patients. Methods: Papillary thyroid carcinoma patients staged T1-4N0M0 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1975 and 2015, stratified by nonsurgical and surgical management. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for imbalances in covariates. Multivariable models were constructed using restricted cubic splines to model nonlinear relationships of age and tumor size with DSS. Results: Overall, 1453 nonoperative patients and 54,718 surgical patients met the inclusion criteria. Collectively, increasing age and size after certain thresholds independently led to greater differences in DSS between nonsurgical and surgical patients. For younger ages (14-55 years), surgical approach compared with nonsurgical approach was not associated with any difference in the 10-year DSS among 0-4 cm cancers (99.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.470), 4.1-6 cm cancers (98.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.599), or >6 cm cancers (97.3% vs. 100%, p = 0.718). Older patients with larger tumors (>75 years, >6 cm) demonstrated the greatest difference in DSS (48.1% vs. 91.3%, p < 0.001). Similar results were found when applying propensity score matching. For age, restricted cubic spline plots showed minimal relative survival hazard in nonoperative cases beginning after age 60 years, with a change point illustrating acceleration in relative hazard beyond age 72 years. For size, relative survival hazard was observed after 2.0 cm and increased slowly with nodule growth up to an inflection point of 4.5 cm. Beyond this, mortality risk escalated with each additional year without plateau. Conclusions: Increasing age and size lead to progressively greater mortality risk without surgery, but only beyond certain thresholds. We define escalating gradients at which a nonsurgical approach may be deemed appropriate, and beyond which survival benefits from surgery become apparent. Such findings reconcile controversial observations regarding age and size in active surveillance and further reshape evolving treatment paradigms in thyroid cancer.
Background: Active surveillance is established as an alternative to surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas, but inclusion criteria and mortality risk for pursuing a nonsurgical approach have not been clearly defined. To gauge the feasibility of expanding active surveillance thresholds, we investigated the effects of increasing size and age on disease-specific survival (DSS) in a large nonoperative thyroid cancer cohort, compared against a matched group of surgical patients. Methods:Papillary thyroid carcinomapatients staged T1-4N0M0 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1975 and 2015, stratified by nonsurgical and surgical management. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for imbalances in covariates. Multivariable models were constructed using restricted cubic splines to model nonlinear relationships of age and tumor size with DSS. Results: Overall, 1453 nonoperative patients and 54,718 surgical patients met the inclusion criteria. Collectively, increasing age and size after certain thresholds independently led to greater differences in DSS between nonsurgical and surgical patients. For younger ages (14-55 years), surgical approach compared with nonsurgical approach was not associated with any difference in the 10-year DSS among 0-4 cm cancers (99.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.470), 4.1-6 cm cancers (98.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.599), or >6 cm cancers (97.3% vs. 100%, p = 0.718). Older patients with larger tumors (>75 years, >6 cm) demonstrated the greatest difference in DSS (48.1% vs. 91.3%, p < 0.001). Similar results were found when applying propensity score matching. For age, restricted cubic spline plots showed minimal relative survival hazard in nonoperative cases beginning after age 60 years, with a change point illustrating acceleration in relative hazard beyond age 72 years. For size, relative survival hazard was observed after 2.0 cm and increased slowly with nodule growth up to an inflection point of 4.5 cm. Beyond this, mortality risk escalated with each additional year without plateau. Conclusions: Increasing age and size lead to progressively greater mortality risk without surgery, but only beyond certain thresholds. We define escalating gradients at which a nonsurgical approach may be deemed appropriate, and beyond which survival benefits from surgery become apparent. Such findings reconcile controversial observations regarding age and size in active surveillance and further reshape evolving treatment paradigms in thyroid cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
active surveillance; low-risk cancer; nonsurgical treatment; papillary thyroid carcinoma; thyroid cancer
Authors: Ian Ganly; Iain J Nixon; Laura Y Wang; Frank L Palmer; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Ahmad Aniss; Mark Sywak; Antoine E Eskander; Jeremy L Freeman; Michael J Campbell; Wen T Shen; Fernanda Vaisman; Denise Momesso; Rossana Corbo; Mario Vaisman; Ashok Shaha; R Michael Tuttle; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Thomas A D'Agostino; Elyse Shuk; Erin K Maloney; Rebecca Zeuren; R Michael Tuttle; Carma L Bylund Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Laura J Esserman; Ian M Thompson; Brian Reid; Peter Nelson; David F Ransohoff; H Gilbert Welch; Shelley Hwang; Donald A Berry; Kenneth W Kinzler; William C Black; Mina Bissell; Howard Parnes; Sudhir Srivastava Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Iain J Nixon; Deborah Kuk; Volkert Wreesmann; Luc Morris; Frank L Palmer; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Bhuvanesh Singh; R Michael Tuttle; Ashok R Shaha; Mithat Gönen; Jatin P Shah Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lisa M Lowenstein; Spyridon P Basourakos; Michelle D Williams; Patricia Troncoso; Justin R Gregg; Timothy C Thompson; Jeri Kim Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Allen S Ho; Sungjin Kim; Cynthia Zalt; Michelle L Melany; Irene E Chen; Joan Vasquez; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Michelle M Chen; Missael Vasquez; Xuemo Fan; Welmoed K van Deen; Robert W Haile; Timothy J Daskivich; Zachary S Zumsteg; Glenn D Braunstein; Wendy L Sacks Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 33.006
Authors: Whitney Sutton; Philip K Crepeau; Joseph K Canner; Shkala Karzai; Dorry L Segev; Aarti Mathur Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.125
Authors: Allen S Ho; Michael Luu; Laurel Barrios; Bonnie L Balzer; Shikha Bose; Xuemo Fan; Evan Walgama; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Usman Alam; Iram Shafqat; De-Chen Lin; Yufei Chen; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Ellie G Maghami; Glenn D Braunstein; Wendy L Sacks; Zachary S Zumsteg Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Whitney Sutton; Becky Genberg; Jason D Prescott; Dorry L Segev; Martha A Zeiger; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Aarti Mathur Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 3.982