Progress in proteomics research has led to a demand for powerful analytical tools with high separation efficiency and sensitivity for confident identification and quantification of proteins, posttranslational modifications, and protein complexes expressed in cells and tissues. This demand has significantly increased interest in capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) in the past few years. This review provides highlights of recent advances in CE-MS for proteomics research, including a short introduction to top-down mass spectrometry and native mass spectrometry (native MS), as well as a detailed overview of CE methods. Both the potential and limitations of these methods for the analysis of proteins and peptides in synthetic and biological samples and the challenges of CE methods are discussed, along with perspectives about the future direction of CE-MS. @ 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 00:1-16, 2019.
Progress in proteomics research has led to a demand for powerful analytical tools with high separation efficiency and sensitivity for confident identification and quantification of proteins, posttranslational modifications, and protein complexes expressed in cells and tissues. This demand has significantly increased interest in capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-pan class="Gene">MS) in the past few years. This review provides highlights of recent advances in CE-n>n class="Gene">MS for proteomics research, including a short introduction to top-down mass spectrometry and native mass spectrometry (native MS), as well as a detailed overview of CE methods. Both the potential and limitations of these methods for the analysis of proteins and peptides in synthetic and biological samples and the challenges of CE methods are discussed, along with perspectives about the future direction of CE-MS. @ 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 00:1-16, 2019.
Authors: Kevin Jooß; Sven W Meckelmann; Julia Klein; Oliver J Schmitz; Christian Neusüß Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Alba Cristobal; Fabio Marino; Harm Post; Henk W P van den Toorn; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Amanda Khoo; Lydia Y Liu; Julius O Nyalwidhe; O John Semmes; Danny Vesprini; Michelle R Downes; Paul C Boutros; Stanley K Liu; Thomas Kislinger Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Kevin Jooß; Luis F Schachner; Rachel Watson; Zachary B Gillespie; Sarah A Howard; Marcus A Cheek; Matthew J Meiners; Amin Sobh; Jonathan D Licht; Michael-Christopher Keogh; Neil L Kelleher Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 6.986