Peter P Toth1, Sephy Philip2, Michael Hull3, Craig Granowitz2. 1. Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Preventive Cardiology, CGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL. Electronic address: Peter.Toth@cghmc.com. 2. Department of Medical Affairs, Amarin Pharma, Inc, Bedminster, NJ. 3. Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Inc, Eden Prairie, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the real-world impact of elevated triglyceride (TG) levels on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, medical resource utilization, and medical costs using observational administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. METHODS: Patients with one or more claims for statin therapy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010, and 6 months or more of baseline data prior to the index date were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients aged 45 years or older with diabetes and/or atherosclerotic CV disease were included and analyzed in an elevated TG cohort (≥150 mg/dL) vs a comparator cohort with TG levels less than 150 mg/dL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels greater than 40 mg/dL. RESULTS: In the elevated TG vs propensity-matched comparator cohorts (both N=23,181 patients), the mean age was 62.2 vs 62.6 years, mean follow-up was 41.4 vs 42.5 months, 49.7% (11,518) vs 49.5% (11,467) were female, 83.7% (19,392) vs 84.0% (19,478) had diabetes, and 29.8% (6915) vs 29.3% (6800) had atherosclerotic CV disease. In the elevated TG (N=27,471 patients) vs comparator (N=32,506 patients) cohorts, multivariate analysis revealed significantly greater risk of composite major CV events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19-1.34; P<.001), nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.20-1.45; P<.001), nonfatal stroke (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24; P=.004), and need for coronary revascularization (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33-1.61; P<.001) but not unstable angina (P=.53) or CV death (P=.23). Increased CV risk was maintained with the addition of non-HDL-C to the multivariate model and with high and low HDL-C subgroup analysis. Total direct health care costs (cost ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16; P<.001) and inpatient hospital stays (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.10-1.17; P<.001) were significantly higher in the elevated TG cohort vs the comparator cohort. CONCLUSION: Statin-treated patients with TG levels of 150 mg/dL or greater had worse CV and health economic outcomes than those with well-managed TG (<150 mg/dL) and HDL-C (>40 mg/dL) levels.
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the real-world impact of elevated triglyceride (TG) levels on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, medical resource utilization, and medical costs using observational administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. METHODS:Patients with one or more claims for statin therapy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010, and 6 months or more of baseline data prior to the index date were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients aged 45 years or older with diabetes and/or atherosclerotic CV disease were included and analyzed in an elevated TG cohort (≥150 mg/dL) vs a comparator cohort with TG levels less than 150 mg/dL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels greater than 40 mg/dL. RESULTS: In the elevated TG vs propensity-matched comparator cohorts (both N=23,181 patients), the mean age was 62.2 vs 62.6 years, mean follow-up was 41.4 vs 42.5 months, 49.7% (11,518) vs 49.5% (11,467) were female, 83.7% (19,392) vs 84.0% (19,478) had diabetes, and 29.8% (6915) vs 29.3% (6800) had atherosclerotic CV disease. In the elevated TG (N=27,471 patients) vs comparator (N=32,506 patients) cohorts, multivariate analysis revealed significantly greater risk of composite major CV events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19-1.34; P<.001), nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.20-1.45; P<.001), nonfatal stroke (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24; P=.004), and need for coronary revascularization (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33-1.61; P<.001) but not unstable angina (P=.53) or CV death (P=.23). Increased CV risk was maintained with the addition of non-HDL-C to the multivariate model and with high and low HDL-C subgroup analysis. Total direct health care costs (cost ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16; P<.001) and inpatient hospital stays (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.10-1.17; P<.001) were significantly higher in the elevated TG cohort vs the comparator cohort. CONCLUSION: Statin-treated patients with TG levels of 150 mg/dL or greater had worse CV and health economic outcomes than those with well-managed TG (<150 mg/dL) and HDL-C (>40 mg/dL) levels.
Authors: Tsion Aberra; Eric D Peterson; Neha J Pagidipati; Hillary Mulder; Daniel M Wojdyla; Sephy Philip; Craig Granowitz; Ann Marie Navar Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 4.766