BACKGROUND: Elevated triglycerides (TGs) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the best way to both measure TGs and assess TG-related risk remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the association between TGs and CVD and determine whether the average of a series of TG measurements is more predictive of CVD risk than a single TG measurement. METHODS: We examined 15,792 study participants, aged 40-65 years, free of CVD from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities and Framingham Offspring studies, using fasting TG measurements across multiple examinations over time. With up to 10 years of follow-up, we assessed time-to-first CVD event, as well as a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Compared with a single TG measurement, average TGs over time had greater discrimination for CVD risk (C-statistic, 0.60 vs 0.57). Risk for CVD increased as average TGs rose until an inflection point of ~100 mg/dL in men and ~200 mg/dL in women, above which this risk association plateaued. The relationship between average TGs and CVD remained statistically significant in multivariable modeling adjusting for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and interactions were found by sex and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. CONCLUSIONS: The average of several TG readings provides incremental improvements for the prediction of CVD relative to a single TG measurement. Regardless of the method of measurement, higher TGs were associated with increased CVD risk, even at levels previously considered "optimal" (<150 mg/dL).
BACKGROUND: Elevated triglycerides (TGs) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the best way to both measure TGs and assess TG-related risk remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the association between TGs and CVD and determine whether the average of a series of TG measurements is more predictive of CVD risk than a single TG measurement. METHODS: We examined 15,792 study participants, aged 40-65 years, free of CVD from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities and Framingham Offspring studies, using fasting TG measurements across multiple examinations over time. With up to 10 years of follow-up, we assessed time-to-first CVD event, as well as a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Compared with a single TG measurement, average TGs over time had greater discrimination for CVD risk (C-statistic, 0.60 vs 0.57). Risk for CVD increased as average TGs rose until an inflection point of ~100 mg/dL in men and ~200 mg/dL in women, above which this risk association plateaued. The relationship between average TGs and CVD remained statistically significant in multivariable modeling adjusting for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and interactions were found by sex and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. CONCLUSIONS: The average of several TG readings provides incremental improvements for the prediction of CVD relative to a single TG measurement. Regardless of the method of measurement, higher TGs were associated with increased CVD risk, even at levels previously considered "optimal" (<150 mg/dL).
Authors: Jacquelaine Bartlett; Irene M Predazzi; Scott M Williams; William S Bush; Yeunjung Kim; Stephen Havas; Peter P Toth; Sergio Fazio; Michael Miller Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-05-10
Authors: Michael Miller; Neil J Stone; Christie Ballantyne; Vera Bittner; Michael H Criqui; Henry N Ginsberg; Anne Carol Goldberg; William James Howard; Marc S Jacobson; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Terry A Lennie; Moshe Levi; Theodore Mazzone; Subramanian Pennathur Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Deepak L Bhatt; P Gabriel Steg; Michael Miller; Eliot A Brinton; Terry A Jacobson; Steven B Ketchum; Ralph T Doyle; Rebecca A Juliano; Lixia Jiao; Craig Granowitz; Jean-Claude Tardif; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Margaret D Carroll; David A Lacher; Paul D Sorlie; James I Cleeman; David J Gordon; Michael Wolz; Scott M Grundy; Clifford L Johnson Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Allan D Sniderman; Patrick Couture; Seth S Martin; Jacqueline DeGraaf; Patrick R Lawler; William C Cromwell; John T Wilkins; George Thanassoulis Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Patrick R Lawler; Gynter Kotrri; Maria Koh; Shaun G Goodman; Michael E Farkouh; Douglas S Lee; Peter C Austin; Jacob A Udell; Dennis T Ko Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Andrew P Ambrosy; Jingrong Yang; Sue Hee Sung; Amanda R Allen; Jesse K Fitzpatrick; Jamal S Rana; Jeffrey Wagner; Sephy Philip; David Abrahamson; Craig Granowitz; Alan S Go Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 5.501