Katherine L Marcus1, Gisella Santos2, Agustín Ciapponi3, Daniel Comandé3, Madeline Bilodeau4, Joanne Wolfe5, Veronica Dussel6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Center for Research and Implementation in Palliative Care, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Cochrane Center, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Center for Research and Implementation in Palliative Care, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: veronica_dussel@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Specialized pediatric palliative care (SPPC) is increasingly involved in the care of seriously ill children, yet the evidence on its impact has not been comprehensively reviewed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effects of providing SPPC to seriously ill children on patient-, caregiver-, and systems-level outcomes. METHODS: We performed a Systematic Review following Cochrane methods. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, and Web of Science were searched from January 1996 to June 2018. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: We included randomized controlled, cohort, case-control, and before-after studies in which exposure to SPPC services was the intervention of interest. All outcomes reported in these studies were included. Two investigators independently selected articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies using standardized criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included in qualitative synthesis: one nonrandomized controlled trial, 16 cohort studies, and seven before-after studies. Evidence certainty was low. Twenty-one studies had one or more area with high risk of bias, most commonly selection bias, low group comparability, risk for confounding, and inadequate statistical reporting. Studies analyzed 46 domains, operationalized as 136 distinct outcomes. SPPC was associated with better child quality of life scores in all four studies that assessed this outcome. No other outcome showed this consistency. CONCLUSION: Receiving SPPC was associated with better child quality of life. However, the paucity and low certainty of the evidence precluded any firm recommendations about SPPC practice. Larger collaborative networks and greater consensus regarding SPPC research standards are needed.
CONTEXT: Specialized pediatric palliative care (SPPC) is increasingly involved in the care of seriously ill children, yet the evidence on its impact has not been comprehensively reviewed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effects of providing SPPC to seriously ill children on patient-, caregiver-, and systems-level outcomes. METHODS: We performed a Systematic Review following Cochrane methods. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, and Web of Science were searched from January 1996 to June 2018. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: We included randomized controlled, cohort, case-control, and before-after studies in which exposure to SPPC services was the intervention of interest. All outcomes reported in these studies were included. Two investigators independently selected articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies using standardized criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included in qualitative synthesis: one nonrandomized controlled trial, 16 cohort studies, and seven before-after studies. Evidence certainty was low. Twenty-one studies had one or more area with high risk of bias, most commonly selection bias, low group comparability, risk for confounding, and inadequate statistical reporting. Studies analyzed 46 domains, operationalized as 136 distinct outcomes. SPPC was associated with better child quality of life scores in all four studies that assessed this outcome. No other outcome showed this consistency. CONCLUSION: Receiving SPPC was associated with better child quality of life. However, the paucity and low certainty of the evidence precluded any firm recommendations about SPPC practice. Larger collaborative networks and greater consensus regarding SPPC research standards are needed.
Authors: Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Louise Brereton; Joseph Clark; Christine Ingleton; Clare Gardiner; Louise Preston; Tony Ryan; Elizabeth Goyder Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Joanne Wolfe; Liliana Orellana; E Francis Cook; Christina Ullrich; Tammy Kang; Jeffrey Russell Geyer; Chris Feudtner; Jane C Weeks; Veronica Dussel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew Papworth; Julia Hackett; Bryony Beresford; Fliss Murtagh; Helen Weatherly; Sebastian Hinde; Andre Bedendo; Gabriella Walker; Jane Noyes; Sam Oddie; Chakrapani Vasudevan; Richard Feltbower; Bob Phillips; Richard Hain; Gayathri Subramanian; Andrew Haynes; Lorna K Fraser Journal: NIHR Open Res Date: 2022-05-13
Authors: Gregorio Zuniga-Villanueva; Jorge Alberto Ramos-Guerrero; Monica Osio-Saldaña; Jessica A Casas; Joan Marston; Regina Okhuysen-Cawley Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-03-23