Literature DB >> 18049195

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Jan P Vandenbroucke1, Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche, Cynthia D Mulrow, Stuart J Pocock, Charles Poole, James J Schlesselman, Matthias Egger.   

Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers.This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18049195     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  512 in total

1.  Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction.

Authors:  Mirjam J Knol; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Case-control studies of sporadic enteric infections: a review and discussion of studies conducted internationally from 1990 to 2009.

Authors:  Kathleen E Fullerton; Elaine Scallan; Martyn D Kirk; Barbara E Mahon; Frederick J Angulo; Henriette de Valk; Wilfrid van Pelt; Charmaine Gauci; Anja M Hauri; Shannon Majowicz; Sarah J O'Brien
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.171

Review 3.  A systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity: toward a more uniform methodology.

Authors:  Martin Fortin; Moira Stewart; Marie-Eve Poitras; José Almirall; Heather Maddocks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  [Minimum requirements for high quality reporting of medical research results : CONSORT, STROBE and PRISMA statements].

Authors:  A Stevanovic; M Coburn; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  The challenges for research on deep brain stimulation and memory.

Authors:  Maurits van den Noort; Peggy Bosch; Sujung Yeo; Sabina Lim
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Early gallbladder carcinoma has a favorable outcome but Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus involvement is an adverse prognostic factor.

Authors:  Juan C Roa; Oscar Tapia; Carlos Manterola; Miguel Villaseca; Pablo Guzman; Juan Carlos Araya; Pelin Bagci; Burcu Saka; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Which of these things is not like the others?

Authors:  Jay S Kaufman; Richard F MacLehose
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

9.  Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 10.  The methodology of population surveys of headache prevalence, burden and cost: principles and recommendations from the Global Campaign against Headache.

Authors:  Lars Jacob Stovner; Mohammed Al Jumah; Gretchen L Birbeck; Gopalakrishna Gururaj; Rigmor Jensen; Zaza Katsarava; Luiz Paulo Queiroz; Ann I Scher; Redda Tekle-Haimanot; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Timothy J Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.