| Literature DB >> 15337406 |
Ulrika Kreicbergs1, Unnur Valdimarsdóttir, Gunnar Steineck, Jan-Inge Henter.
Abstract
A proposed nationwide postal questionnaire to Swedish parents who had lost a child due to cancer between 1992 and 1997 was denied approval by the local ethics committee. However, a pilot study to assess the harm and benefit of the questionnaire was approved. 95% of parents found the pilot study valuable; thus, we were allowed to proceed with the main study, which consisted of 129 questions about the child's care and death and five about the parents' perceptions of the study. 423 (99%) parents found the investigation valuable, 285 (68%) were positively affected, and 123 (28%) were negatively affected (10 [2%] of whom, very much). Although the numerical data cannot be directly translated to ethical conclusions, they can provide guidance for future ethical decisions.Entities:
Keywords: Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15337406 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16939-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet ISSN: 0140-6736 Impact factor: 79.321