Literature DB >> 31402096

Bicoid-Dependent Activation of the Target Gene hunchback Requires a Two-Motif Sequence Code in a Specific Basal Promoter.

Jia Ling1, Kristaley Yui Umezawa1, Theresa Scott1, Stephen Small2.   

Abstract

In complex genetic loci, individual enhancers interact most often with specific basal promoters. Here we investigate the activation of the Bicoid target gene hunchback (hb), which contains two basal promoters (P1 and P2). Early in embryogenesis, P1 is silent, while P2 is strongly activated. In vivo deletion of P2 does not cause activation of P1, suggesting that P2 contains intrinsic sequence motifs required for activation. We show that a two-motif code (a Zelda binding site plus TATA) is required and sufficient for P2 activation. Zelda sites are present in the promoters of many embryonically expressed genes, but the combination of Zelda plus TATA does not seem to be a general code for early activation or Bicoid-specific activation per se. Because Zelda sites are also found in Bicoid-dependent enhancers, we propose that simultaneous binding to both enhancers and promoters independently synchronizes chromatin accessibility and facilitates correct enhancer-promoter interactions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enhancer; gene regulation; promoter; promoter choice; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31402096      PMCID: PMC6754290          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  54 in total

1.  Enhancer-promoter specificity mediated by DPE or TATA core promoter motifs.

Authors:  J E Butler; J T Kadonaga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  The Hierarchy of Transcriptional Activation: From Enhancer to Promoter.

Authors:  Douglas Vernimmen; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via phiC31 integrase-mediated cassette exchange.

Authors:  Jack R Bateman; Anne M Lee; C-ting Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Caudal, a key developmental regulator, is a DPE-specific transcriptional factor.

Authors:  Tamar Juven-Gershon; Jer-Yuan Hsu; James T Kadonaga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Multiple enhancers ensure precision of gap gene-expression patterns in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Michael W Perry; Alistair N Boettiger; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Zelda potentiates morphogen activity by increasing chromatin accessibility.

Authors:  Sun Melody Foo; Yujia Sun; Bomyi Lim; Ruta Ziukaite; Kevin O'Brien; Chung-Yi Nien; Nikolai Kirov; Stanislav Y Shvartsman; Christine A Rushlow
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains.

Authors:  Chunhui Hou; Li Li; Zhaohui S Qin; Victor G Corces
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Tom Sexton; Eitan Yaffe; Ephraim Kenigsberg; Frédéric Bantignies; Benjamin Leblanc; Michael Hoichman; Hugues Parrinello; Amos Tanay; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease.

Authors:  Scott J Gratz; Alexander M Cummings; Jennifer N Nguyen; Danielle C Hamm; Laura K Donohue; Melissa M Harrison; Jill Wildonger; Kate M O'Connor-Giles
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Zelda overcomes the high intrinsic nucleosome barrier at enhancers during Drosophila zygotic genome activation.

Authors:  Yujia Sun; Chung-Yi Nien; Kai Chen; Hsiao-Yun Liu; Jeff Johnston; Julia Zeitlinger; Christine Rushlow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  7 in total

1.  Dynamic modulation of enhancer responsiveness by core promoter elements in living Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Moe Yokoshi; Koji Kawasaki; Manuel Cambón; Takashi Fukaya
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Divergent expression of paralogous genes by modification of shared enhancer activity through a promoter-proximal silencer.

Authors:  Ryan Loker; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 10.900

3.  Differential regulation of alternative promoters emerges from unified kinetics of enhancer-promoter interaction.

Authors:  Jingyao Wang; Shihe Zhang; Hongfang Lu; Heng Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Two promoters integrate multiple enhancer inputs to drive wild-type knirps expression in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.

Authors:  Lily Li; Rachel Waymack; Mario Gad; Zeba Wunderlich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Synthetic reconstruction of the hunchback promoter specifies the role of Bicoid, Zelda and Hunchback in the dynamics of its transcription.

Authors:  Gonçalo Fernandes; Huy Tran; Maxime Andrieu; Youssoupha Diaw; Carmina Perez Romero; Cécile Fradin; Mathieu Coppey; Aleksandra M Walczak; Nathalie Dostatni
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 6.  Dynamic patterning by morphogens illuminated by cis-regulatory studies.

Authors:  Jihyun Irizarry; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 7.  Transcriptional Enhancers in Drosophila.

Authors:  Stephen Small; David N Arnosti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.562

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.