Literature DB >> 34849867

Two promoters integrate multiple enhancer inputs to drive wild-type knirps expression in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.

Lily Li1, Rachel Waymack1, Mario Gad1, Zeba Wunderlich1,2.   

Abstract

Proper development depends on precise spatiotemporal gene expression patterns. Most developmental genes are regulated by multiple enhancers and often by multiple core promoters that generate similar transcripts. We hypothesize that multiple promoters may be required either because enhancers prefer a specific promoter or because multiple promoters serve as a redundancy mechanism. To test these hypotheses, we studied the expression of the knirps locus in the early Drosophila melanogaster embryo, which is mediated by multiple enhancers and core promoters. We found that one of these promoters resembles a typical "sharp" developmental promoter, while the other resembles a "broad" promoter usually associated with housekeeping genes. Using synthetic reporter constructs, we found that some, but not all, enhancers in the locus show a preference for one promoter, indicating that promoters provide both redundancy and specificity. By analyzing the reporter dynamics, we identified specific burst properties during the transcription process, namely burst size and frequency, that are most strongly tuned by the combination of promoter and enhancer. Using locus-sized reporters, we discovered that enhancers with no promoter preference in a synthetic setting have a preference in the locus context. Our results suggest that the presence of multiple promoters in a locus is due both to enhancer preference and a need for redundancy and that "broad" promoters with dispersed transcription start sites are common among developmental genes. They also imply that it can be difficult to extrapolate expression measurements from synthetic reporters to the locus context, where other variables shape a gene's overall expression pattern.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Drosophila melanogasterzzm321990 ; zzm321990 knirpszzm321990 ; enhancer; enhancer–core-promoter specificity; promoter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34849867      PMCID: PMC8664596          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  62 in total

1.  Caudal, a key developmental regulator, is a DPE-specific transcriptional factor.

Authors:  Tamar Juven-Gershon; Jer-Yuan Hsu; James T Kadonaga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Bicoid-Dependent Activation of the Target Gene hunchback Requires a Two-Motif Sequence Code in a Specific Basal Promoter.

Authors:  Jia Ling; Kristaley Yui Umezawa; Theresa Scott; Stephen Small
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Enhancer redundancy in development and disease.

Authors:  Evgeny Z Kvon; Zeba Wunderlich; Rachel Waymack; Mario Gad
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Drosophila TFIID binds to a conserved downstream basal promoter element that is present in many TATA-box-deficient promoters.

Authors:  T W Burke; J T Kadonaga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Mechanism of synergy between TATA and initiator: synergistic binding of TFIID following a putative TFIIA-induced isomerization.

Authors:  K H Emami; A Jain; S T Smale
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Core promoter binding by histone-like TAF complexes.

Authors:  Hanshuang Shao; Merav Revach; Sandra Moshonov; Yael Tzuman; Kfir Gazit; Shira Albeck; Tamar Unger; Rivka Dikstein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Transcription properties of a cell type-specific TATA-binding protein, TRF.

Authors:  S K Hansen; S Takada; R H Jacobson; J T Lis; R Tjian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-10-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Conserved noncoding transcription and core promoter regulatory code in early Drosophila development.

Authors:  Philippe J Batut; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Large-scale analysis of Drosophila core promoter function using synthetic promoters.

Authors:  Zhan Qi; Christophe Jung; Peter Bandilla; Claudia Ludwig; Mark Heron; Anja Sophie Kiesel; Mariam Museridze; Julia Philippou-Massier; Miroslav Nikolov; Alessio Renna Max Schnepf; Ulrich Unnerstall; Stefano Ceolin; Bettina Mühlig; Nicolas Gompel; Johannes Soeding; Ulrike Gaul
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Enhancer additivity and non-additivity are determined by enhancer strength in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Jacques P Bothma; Hernan G Garcia; Samuel Ng; Michael W Perry; Thomas Gregor; Michael Levine
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optogenetic control of the Bicoid morphogen reveals fast and slow modes of gap gene regulation.

Authors:  Anand P Singh; Ping Wu; Sergey Ryabichko; João Raimundo; Michael Swan; Eric Wieschaus; Thomas Gregor; Jared E Toettcher
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.995

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.