Stephanie C Hammel1, Jessica L Levasseur2, Kate Hoffman3, Allison L Phillips4, Amelia M Lorenzo5, Antonia M Calafat6, Thomas F Webster7, Heather M Stapleton8. 1. Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: stephanie.hammel@duke.edu. 2. Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: jessica.levasseur@duke.edu. 3. Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: kate.hoffman@duke.edu. 4. Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: allison.l.phillips@duke.edu. 5. Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: amelia.lorenzo@duke.edu. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: aic7@cdc.gov. 7. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: twebster@bu.edu. 8. Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Children's Health Discovery Initiative, Duke School of Medicine, NC, United States. Electronic address: heather.stapleton@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phthalates and their potential replacements, including non-phthalate plasticizers, are ubiquitous in home environments due to their presence in building materials, plastics, and personal care products. As a result, exposure to these compounds is universal. However, the primary pathways of exposure and understanding which products in the home are associated most strongly with particular exposures are unclear. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the relationships between phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers in paired samples of house dust, hand wipes, and their corresponding metabolites in children's urine samples (n = 180). In addition, we compared product use or presence of materials in the household against all compounds to investigate the relationship between product use or presence and exposure. METHODS: Children aged 3-6 years provided hand wipe and urine samples. Questionnaires were completed by mothers or legal guardians to capture product use and housing characteristics, and house dust samples were collected from the main living area during home visits. RESULTS: Phthalates and non-phthalate replacements were detected frequently in the environmental matrices. All urine samples had at least 13 of 19 phthalate or non-phthalate replacement metabolites present. Hand wipe mass and dust concentrations of diisobutyl phthalate, benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and di-isononyl phthalate were significantly associated with their corresponding urinary metabolites (rs = 0.18-0.56, p < 0.05). Bis(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHTP) in dust was also significantly and positively correlated with its urinary metabolites (rs = 0.33, p < 0.001). Vinyl flooring was most significantly and positively associated with particular phthalate exposures (indicated by concentrations in environmental matrices and urinary biomarkers). In particular, children who lived in homes with 100% vinyl flooring had urinary concentrations of monobenzyl phthalate, a BBP metabolite, that were 15 times higher than those of children who lived in homes with no vinyl flooring (p < 0.0001). Levels of BBP in hand wipes and dust were 3.5 and 4.5 times higher, respectively, in those homes with 100% vinyl flooring (p < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: This paper summarizes one of the most comprehensive phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizer investigation of potential residential exposure sources conducted in North America to date. The data presented herein provide evidence that dermal contact and hand-to-mouth behaviors are important sources of exposure to phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers. In addition, the percentage of vinyl flooring is an important consideration when examining residential exposures to these compounds.
BACKGROUND:Phthalates and their potential replacements, including non-phthalate plasticizers, are ubiquitous in home environments due to their presence in building materials, plastics, and personal care products. As a result, exposure to these compounds is universal. However, the primary pathways of exposure and understanding which products in the home are associated most strongly with particular exposures are unclear. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the relationships between phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers in paired samples of house dust, hand wipes, and their corresponding metabolites in children's urine samples (n = 180). In addition, we compared product use or presence of materials in the household against all compounds to investigate the relationship between product use or presence and exposure. METHODS:Children aged 3-6 years provided hand wipe and urine samples. Questionnaires were completed by mothers or legal guardians to capture product use and housing characteristics, and house dust samples were collected from the main living area during home visits. RESULTS:Phthalates and non-phthalate replacements were detected frequently in the environmental matrices. All urine samples had at least 13 of 19 phthalate or non-phthalate replacement metabolites present. Hand wipe mass and dust concentrations of diisobutyl phthalate, benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and di-isononyl phthalate were significantly associated with their corresponding urinary metabolites (rs = 0.18-0.56, p < 0.05). Bis(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHTP) in dust was also significantly and positively correlated with its urinary metabolites (rs = 0.33, p < 0.001). Vinyl flooring was most significantly and positively associated with particular phthalate exposures (indicated by concentrations in environmental matrices and urinary biomarkers). In particular, children who lived in homes with 100% vinyl flooring had urinary concentrations of monobenzyl phthalate, a BBP metabolite, that were 15 times higher than those of children who lived in homes with no vinyl flooring (p < 0.0001). Levels of BBP in hand wipes and dust were 3.5 and 4.5 times higher, respectively, in those homes with 100% vinyl flooring (p < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: This paper summarizes one of the most comprehensive phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizer investigation of potential residential exposure sources conducted in North America to date. The data presented herein provide evidence that dermal contact and hand-to-mouth behaviors are important sources of exposure to phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers. In addition, the percentage of vinyl flooring is an important consideration when examining residential exposures to these compounds.
Authors: Heather M Stapleton; Shannon M Kelly; Joseph G Allen; Michael D Mcclean; Thomas F Webster Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Susanna D Mitro; Robin E Dodson; Veena Singla; Gary Adamkiewicz; Angelo F Elmi; Monica K Tilly; Ami R Zota Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Jessica L Levasseur; Stephanie C Hammel; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Sharon Zhang; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Jian Zhang; Catherine A Powell; Matthew K Kay; Min Hi Park; Sunitha Meruvu; Ravi Sonkar; Mahua Choudhury Journal: Toxicol Res (Camb) Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.524
Authors: Stephanie C Hammel; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Jessica L Levasseur; Amelia M Lorenzo; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Yuchao Wan; Michelle L North; Garthika Navaranjan; Anne K Ellis; Jeffrey A Siegel; Miriam L Diamond Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Bo Yuan; Joo Hui Tay; Eleni Papadopoulou; Line Småstuen Haug; Juan Antonio Padilla-Sánchez; Cynthia A de Wit Journal: Environ Sci Technol Lett Date: 2020-02-10
Authors: Christopher D Kassotis; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Sharon Zhang; Ellen M Cooper; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2020-11-14 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Anna R Smith; Katherine R Kogut; Kimberly Parra; Asa Bradman; Nina Holland; Kim G Harley Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 5.563