Literature DB >> 16183429

Rates of completion of the medical evaluation for renal transplantation.

Francis L Weng1, Marshall M Joffe, Harold I Feldman, Kevin C Mange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure to complete the medical evaluation for renal transplantation may impede access to transplantation and preclude the possibility of preemptive transplantation. We sought to (1) characterize completion rates of the transplantation medical evaluation and (2) determine factors associated with completion of the evaluation. We hypothesized that patients not on dialysis therapy complete the evaluation process more quickly than patients receiving dialysis.
METHODS: Between September 2002 and September 2003, a total of 175 patients who were evaluated for renal transplantation at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire. The progress of patients' medical evaluations, including completion of requested tests and evaluations, was extracted from the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: During follow-up, 100 patients (57.1%) completed the evaluation, including tests and evaluations requested by the transplant team, whereas 49 patients (28.0%) had tests still pending. The remaining patients died (2.3%), lost interest in transplantation (1.1%), or were immediately (7.4%) or later (4.0%) declared medically ineligible for transplantation. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, black race (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 1.00; P = 0.05) was associated with time to completion of the transplantation evaluation, but receiving maintenance dialysis at the time of the initial transplantation evaluation was not (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.42; P = 0.72).
CONCLUSION: Completion of the medical evaluation for transplantation is slower in blacks than nonblacks. We were unable to detect a significant difference between dialysis and nondialysis patients in rates of completion of the evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16183429     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  43 in total

1.  Predictors of having a potential live donor: a prospective cohort study of kidney transplant candidates.

Authors:  P P Reese; J A Shea; R D Bloom; J S Berns; R Grossman; M Joffe; A Huverserian; H I Feldman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  A Randomized Trial to Reduce Disparities in Referral for Transplant Evaluation.

Authors:  Rachel E Patzer; Sudeshna Paul; Laura Plantinga; Jennifer Gander; Leighann Sauls; Jenna Krisher; Laura L Mulloy; Eric M Gibney; Teri Browne; Carlos F Zayas; William M McClellan; Kimberly Jacob Arriola; Stephen O Pastan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Influence of race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status on kidney disease.

Authors:  Rachel E Patzer; William M McClellan
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Factors associated with completion of pre-kidney transplant evaluations.

Authors:  Eric Siskind; Asha Alex; Mohini Alexander; Meredith Akerman; Christine Mathew; Lara Fishbane; Jisha Thomas; Ezra Israel; Melissa Fana; Cory Evans; Andrew Godwin; Stergiani Agorastos; Barbara Mellace; Jesus Rosado; Prejith P Rajendran; Prathik Krishnan; Poornima Ramadas; Antonette Flecha; Lisa Kiernan; Ruth M Morgan; Nicole Ali; Mala Sachdeva; Kellie Calderon; Susana Hong; Jasmeet Kaur; Amit Basu; Jeffrey Nicastro; Gene Coppa; Madhu Bhaskaran; Ernesto Molmenti
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-03

Review 5.  An overview of disparities and interventions in pediatric kidney transplantation worldwide.

Authors:  Michael A Freeman; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Racial disparities in preemptive referral for kidney transplantation in Georgia.

Authors:  Jennifer C Gander; Xingyu Zhang; Laura Plantinga; Sudeshna Paul; Mohua Basu; Stephen O Pastan; Eric Gibney; Erica Hartmann; Laura Mulloy; Carlos Zayas; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Has the Department of Veterans Affairs Found a Way to Avoid Racial Disparities in the Evaluation Process for Kidney Transplantation?

Authors:  Michael A Freeman; John R Pleis; Kellee R Bornemann; Emilee Croswell; Mary Amanda Dew; Chung-Chou H Chang; Galen E Switzer; Anthony Langone; Anuja Mittal-Henkle; Somnath Saha; Mohan Ramkumar; Jareen Adams Flohr; Christie P Thomas; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Mistrust, misperceptions, and miscommunication: a qualitative study of preferences about kidney transplantation among African Americans.

Authors:  M W Wachterman; E P McCarthy; E R Marcantonio; M Ersek
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Age and sex disparities in discussions about kidney transplantation in adults undergoing dialysis.

Authors:  Megan L Salter; Mara A McAdams-Demarco; Andrew Law; Rebecca J Kamil; Lucy A Meoni; Bernard G Jaar; Stephen M Sozio; Wen Hong Linda Kao; Rulan S Parekh; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Modifiable patient characteristics and racial disparities in evaluation completion and living donor transplant.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Shelley S Hyland; Melanie S McCabe; Emily A Schenk; Jingxia Liu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.