Literature DB >> 31396822

Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts.

Ronen Hershman1,2, Avishai Henik3,4.   

Abstract

The Stroop task gives rise to two major conflicts: the task conflict (respond to the color vs. read the word) and the information conflict that can result from the stimulus-response compatibility (SRC; difference between two responses) or from the stimulus-stimulus compatibility (SSC; difference between the two contradictive pieces of information). We conducted a two-to-one Stroop experiment (i.e., two colors are mapped to one response key) and measured reaction time and pupil dilation. The results showed clear evidence for informational conflict composed of both the SRC and SSC. In addition, pupil indications for task conflict appeared earlier than indications for both the SSC and the SRC, in line with the theory regarding task conflict.

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Informational conflict; Pupillometry; Stimulus–response compatibility; Stimulus–stimulus compatibility; Stroop effect; Task conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31396822     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00971-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

3.  Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Liat Goldfarb; Avishai Henik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping stroop task.

Authors:  Antao Chen; Kira Bailey; Brandy N Tiernan; Robert West
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Inspired by the past and looking to the future of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Avishai Henik; Julie M Bugg; Liat Goldfarb
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2018-06-29

6.  Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.

Authors:  E Kalanthroff; A Henik
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-02-15

7.  Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop Task.

Authors:  J R Simon; P Sudalaimuthu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task.

Authors:  Eyal Kalanthroff; Eddy J Davelaar; Avishai Henik; Liat Goldfarb; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  A novel blink detection method based on pupillometry noise.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Avishai Henik; Noga Cohen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-02

10.  Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference.

Authors:  L McClain
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  A pupillometric study of developmental and individual differences in cognitive effort in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Adi Shechter; Ronen Hershman; David L Share
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Nabil Hasshim; Michael Wadsley; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-13

3.  Task and information conflicts in the numerical Stroop task.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Lisa Beckmann; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.348

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.