Literature DB >> 23416541

Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.

E Kalanthroff1, A Henik.   

Abstract

The Stroop effect is composed of interference and facilitation effects. The facilitation is less stable and thus many times is referred to as a "fragile effect". Here we suggest the facilitation effect is highly vulnerable to individual differences in control over the task conflict (between relevant color naming and irrelevant word reading in the Stroop task). We replicated previous findings of a significant correlation between stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) and Stroop interference, and also found a significant correlation between SSRT and the Stroop facilitation effect-participants with low inhibitory control (i.e., long SSRT) had no facilitation effect or even a reversed one. These results shed new light on the "fragile" facilitation effect and highlight the necessity of awareness of task conflict, especially in the Stroop task.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23416541     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  10 in total

1.  Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching.

Authors:  Eyal Kalanthroff; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-28

2.  Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

3.  Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load.

Authors:  Eyal Kalanthroff; Amir Avnit; Avishai Henik; Eddy J Davelaar; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

4.  Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Yulia Levin; Joseph Tzelgov; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-13

5.  Uncovering the interaction between empathetic pain and cognition.

Authors:  Kesong Hu; Zhiwei Fan; Shuchang He
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-05

6.  What is word? The boundary conditions of task conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Eldad Keha; Eyal Kalanthroff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-09-15

7.  Crowdsourcing for cognitive science--the utility of smartphones.

Authors:  Harriet R Brown; Peter Zeidman; Peter Smittenaar; Rick A Adams; Fiona McNab; Robb B Rutledge; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-20

9.  Task and information conflicts in the numerical Stroop task.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Lisa Beckmann; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.348

10.  Stopping at a red light: Recruitment of inhibitory control by environmental cues.

Authors:  Shachar Hochman; Avishai Henik; Eyal Kalanthroff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.