| Literature DB >> 31395920 |
Donovan Anderson1, Rio Toma1, Yuki Negishi1, Kei Okuda2, Hiroko Ishiniwa3, Thomas G Hinton3, Kenji Nanba1,3, Hidetoshi B Tamate4, Shingo Kaneko5,6.
Abstract
The 2011 Tohoku earthquake drastically changed human activities in some regions of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. The subsequent tsunami damage and radioactive pollution from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant resulted in the evacuation of humans, and abandonment of agricultural lands, allowing population expansion of wildlife into areas formally inhabited by domesticated livestock. Unintentional escape of domesticated pigs into wildlife inhabited environments also occurred. In this study, we tested the possibility of introgression between wild boar and domesticated pigs in Fukushima and neighboring prefectures. We analyzed mitochondrial DNA sequences of 338 wild boar collected from populations in the Tohoku region between 2006 and 2018. Although most boar exhibited Asian boar mitochondrial haplotypes, 18 boar, phenotypically identified as wild boar, had a European domesticated pig haplotype. Frequencies of this haplotype have remained stable since first detection in 2015. This result infers ongoing genetic pollution in wild boar populations from released domesticated pigs. In 2018, this haplotype was detected outside of evacuated areas, suggesting migration and successful adaptation. The natural and anthropocentric disasters at Fukushima gave us the rare opportunity to study introgression processes of domestic genes into populations of wild boar. The present findings suggest a need for additional genetic monitoring to document the dispersal of domestic genes within wild boar stock.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31395920 PMCID: PMC6687819 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47982-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Four D-loop haplotypes found in the wild boar population and seven D-loop haplotypes found in domestic pig samples, based on 21 substitution sites. “n” represents total number of collected samples detected for that haplotype.
| Haplotype | n | Nucleotide number | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160 | 175 | 182 | 187 | 196 | 204 | 209 | 232 | 292 | 311 | 330 | 345 | 353 | 357 | 374 | 441 | 503 | 552 | 611 | 626 | 708 | ||
| J10 | 319 | C | A | A | — | T | T | G | C | T | C | C | G | G | T | T | T | T | G | T | G | C |
| J5 | 3 | C | A | A | — | T | T | G | C | T | C | C | G | A | C | T | T | C | G | C | G | C |
| J3 | 5 | C | A | A | — | T | T | A | C | T | T | C | G | A | C | T | T | T | A | T | G | T |
| H1 | 19a | T | A | G | C | C | C | A | T | T | C | C | A | A | C | T | C | C | A | T | A | C |
| P1 | 1 | T | T | G | C | C | C | A | C | T | C | C | A | A | C | C | C | C | A | T | A | C |
| P2 | 2 | T | T | G | C | C | C | A | T | T | C | T | A | A | C | C | C | C | A | T | A | C |
| P3 | 2 | T | T | G | C | C | C | A | T | T | C | C | A | A | C | C | C | C | A | T | A | C |
| P4 | 2 | T | T | G | C | C | C | A | T | T | C | C | A | A | C | C | C | C | G | T | G | C |
| P5 | 1 | C | A | A | — | T | T | G | C | C | C | T | G | A | T | T | T | C | G | T | G | C |
| P6 | 1 | C | A | A | — | T | T | G | C | T | C | T | G | A | T | T | T | C | A | T | G | C |
a18 individuals from collected wild boar samples, and 1 individual from purchased super market samples.
Figure 1Parsimonious network constructed using 10 mtDNA haplotypes from Japanese wild boar, and European and Asian pigs. These 10 mtDNA haplotypes comprise the six European and Asian pig haplotypes and three wild boar mtDNA haplotypes (J10, J5, and J3) found in the present study.
Frequency of hybrid (H1) haplotype detection before FDNPP accident and after (2014–2018) partitioned by initial evacuation zones (<20 km), Difficult-to-Return to zones (20–40 km), and non-evacuated areas (>40 km).
| Distance from NPP (km) | Number of samples | H1 (%) | Year (number hybrids detected) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–2011 (before accident) | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||
| <20 | 207 | 13 (6.2%) | 0 | 0 | 15 (1) | 52 (5) | 17 (0) | 123 (7) |
| 20–40 | 29 | 2 (6.9%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0) | 14 (2) | 0 | 14 (2) |
| 40 < | 102 | 1 (0.1%) | 46 (0) | 9 (0) | 14 (0) | 18 (0) | 4 (0) | 11 (1) |
| All | 338 | 18 (5.3%) | 46 (0) | 9 (0) | 30 (1) | 84 (7) | 21 (0) | 148 (10) |
Figure 2Forest distribution and sampling locations in Fukushima, Japan. The grey areas represent forest, and the dots show boar sampling locations collected from 2014–2018. A 20 and 40 km radius from the FDNPP (in yellow) are shown by dashed lines. Black dots show sample locations for wild boar haplotype (J10). Detection of H1 (domestic pig crossed with wild boar) haplotype in 2015, 2016 and 2018 are represented by green, blue, and red dots, respectively. 40 Miyagi and Yamagata Prefecture samples obtained in 2006–2011 are not shown, however GPS data are provided in supplemental information.