Literature DB >> 22731769

Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis reveals recent genetic introgression from domestic pigs into Northwest European wild boar populations.

D J Goedbloed1, H J Megens, P Van Hooft, J M Herrero-Medrano, W Lutz, P Alexandri, R P M A Crooijmans, M Groenen, S E Van Wieren, R C Ydenberg, H H T Prins.   

Abstract

Present-day genetic introgression from domestic pigs into European wild boar has been suggested in various studies. However, no hybrids have been identified beyond doubt mainly because available methods were unable to quantify the extent of introgression and rule out natural processes. Genetic introgression from domestic pigs may have far-reaching ecological consequences by altering traits like the reproduction rate or immunology of wild boar. In this study, we demonstrate a novel approach to investigate genetic introgression in a Northwest (NW) European wild boar data set using a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay developed for domestic pigs. We quantified the extent of introgression using allele frequency spectrum analysis, in silico hybridization simulations and genome distribution patterns of introgressed SNPs. Levels of recent introgression in the study area were expected to be low, as pig farming practices are prevailingly intensive and indoors. However, evidence was found for geographically widespread presence of domestic pig SNPs in 10% of analysed wild boar. This was supported by the identification of two different pig mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in three of the identified hybrid wild boar, suggesting that introgression had occurred from multiple sources (pig breeds). In silico hybridization simulations showed that the level of introgression in the identified hybrid wild boar is equivalent to first-generation hybrids until fifth-generation backcrosses with wild boar. The distribution pattern of introgressed SNPs supported these assignments in four of nine hybrids. The other five hybrids are considered advanced-generation hybrids, resulting from interbreeding among hybrid individuals. Three of nine hybrids were genetically associated with a different wild boar population than the one in which they were sampled. This discrepancy suggests that genetic introgression has occurred through the escape or release of an already hybridized farmed wild boar stock. We conclude that genetic introgression from domestic pigs into NW European wild boar populations is more recent and more common than expected and that genome-wide SNP analysis is a promising tool to quantify recent hybridization in free-living populations.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22731769     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05670.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  43 in total

1.  Demographic history, current expansion and future management challenges of wild boar populations in the Balkans and Europe.

Authors:  N Veličković; E Ferreira; M Djan; M Ernst; D Obreht Vidaković; A Monaco; C Fonseca
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Current status and future recommendations for feral swine disease surveillance in the United States.

Authors:  Vienna R Brown; Michael C Marlow; Rachel M Maison; Thomas Gidlewski; Richard Bowen; Angela Bosco-Lauth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Increased Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Disease Prevalence in Domestic Hybrids Among Free-Living Wild Boar.

Authors:  Daniel J Goedbloed; Pim van Hooft; Walburga Lutz; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Sip E van Wieren; Ron C Ydenberg; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  How immunogenetically different are domestic pigs from wild boars: a perspective from single-nucleotide polymorphisms of 19 immunity-related candidate genes.

Authors:  Shanyuan Chen; Rui Gomes; Vânia Costa; Pedro Santos; Rui Charneca; Ya-ping Zhang; Xue-hong Liu; Shao-qing Wang; Pedro Bento; Jose-Luis Nunes; József Buzgó; Gyula Varga; István Anton; Attila Zsolnai; Albano Beja-Pereira
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 5.  Mining the pig genome to investigate the domestication process.

Authors:  S E Ramos-Onsins; W Burgos-Paz; A Manunza; M Amills
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Insight into the Genetic Population Structure of Wild Red Foxes in Poland Reveals Low Risk of Genetic Introgression from Escaped Farm Red Foxes.

Authors:  Heliodor Wierzbicki; Magdalena Zatoń-Dobrowolska; Anna Mucha; Magdalena Moska
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Untangling the hybrid nature of modern pig genomes: a mosaic derived from biogeographically distinct and highly divergent Sus scrofa populations.

Authors:  Mirte Bosse; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Ole Madsen; Laurent A F Frantz; Yogesh Paudel; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Genomic Analysis Reveals Human-Mediated Introgression From European Commercial Pigs to Henan Indigenous Pigs.

Authors:  Kejun Wang; Lige Zhang; Dongdong Duan; Ruimin Qiao; Xiuling Li; Xinjian Li; Xuelei Han
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Introgression dynamics from invasive pigs into wild boar following the March 2011 natural and anthropogenic disasters at Fukushima.

Authors:  Donovan Anderson; Yuki Negishi; Hiroko Ishiniwa; Kei Okuda; Thomas G Hinton; Rio Toma; Junco Nagata; Hidetoshi B Tamate; Shingo Kaneko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Reintroductions and genetic introgression from domestic pigs have shaped the genetic population structure of Northwest European wild boar.

Authors:  Daniel J Goedbloed; Pim van Hooft; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Katharina Langenbeck; Walburga Lutz; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Sip E van Wieren; Ron C Ydenberg; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.