Literature DB >> 15198759

Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study.

K McPherson1, M A Metcalfe, A Herbert, M Maresh, A Casbard, J Hargreaves, S Bridgman, A Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To model the determinants of serious operative and post-operative complications of hysterectomy and their potential risk factors.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort of women undergoing hysterectomies for benign indications in 1994/1995, with a six-week postsurgery follow up. POPULATION AND
SETTING: A total of 37,512 women from 276 NHS and 145 private hospitals in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, originally recruited to compare the outcomes of endometrial destruction with those of hysterectomy.
METHODS: Gynaecologists reported hysterectomies for non-malignant indications carried out during a 12-month period beginning in October 1994 and follow up data were obtained at outpatient follow up six weeks postsurgery. Odds ratios of severe complications by indication and method, adjusting for measured intrinsic risk factors, were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe operative and post-operative complications.
RESULTS: Severe operative complications occurred in 3%. The risk decreased with age and increased with greater parity and history of serious illness. Women with symptomatic fibroids (4.4%, 95% CI 3.9-4.9) experienced more complications than women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding (3.6%, 3.2-3.8), adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.6). Laparoscopic procedures (6.1%) doubled the risk of operative complications of abdominal hysterectomy (3.6%) (adjusted OR = 1.9, 1.5-2.5). Post-operative complications occurred in around 1% of women, with a slight decrease with increasing age, and the strongest risk factor was a history of operative complications. Relative to dysfunctional uterine bleeding (1.0%), a higher risk for fibroids (1.2%) persisted after adjustments (RR = 1.5, 1.1-2.0). Both vaginal (1.2%) and laparoscopic (1.7%) techniques had significantly higher adjusted risks than abdominal operations (0.9%), RR = 1.4 (1.0-1.9) and RR = 1.6 (1.0-2.7). There were no operative deaths; 14 women died within the six-week postsurgery (a crude mortality rate of 3.8/1000, 2.5-6.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy is a common, routine surgery with comparatively rare serious complications. However, younger women, women with more vascular pelvis, who undergo hysterectomy, especially laparoscopically assisted vaginal surgery for symptomatic fibroids, are at most risk of experiencing severe complications both operatively and post-operatively. Therefore, a less invasive alternative treatment for symptomatic fibroids could particularly benefit this group of women, while less invasive treatments for dysfunctional uterine bleeding, such as various methods of endometrial ablations or resections, would need to meet the current low levels of clinical complications in order to replace hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15198759     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  17 in total

1.  Hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Authors:  Leroy C Edozien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.

Authors:  Sarah E Rutstein; Matthew T Siedhoff; Elizabeth J Geller; Kemi M Doll; Jennifer M Wu; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroids: an updated decision analysis following the 2014 Food and Drug Administration safety communications.

Authors:  Matthew T Siedhoff; Kemi M Doll; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Sarah E Rutstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Safe total intrafascial laparoscopic (TAIL) hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael K Hohl; Nik Hauser
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-03-02

5.  A Comparative Study of Non-descent Vaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  M Sarada Murali; Afreen Khan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-04-27

6.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroid tumors in premenopausal women: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Siedhoff; Stephanie B Wheeler; Sarah E Rutstein; Elizabeth J Geller; Kemi M Doll; Jennifer M Wu; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  G McCracken; D Hunter; D Morgan; J H Price
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2006-01

8.  Uterine Cancer After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy Without Hysterectomy in Women With BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Catherine A Shu; Malcolm C Pike; Anjali R Jotwani; Tara M Friebel; Robert A Soslow; Douglas A Levine; Katherine L Nathanson; Jason A Konner; Angela G Arnold; Faina Bogomolniy; Fanny Dao; Narciso Olvera; Elizabeth K Bancroft; Deborah J Goldfrank; Zsofia K Stadler; Mark E Robson; Carol L Brown; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Carol A Aghajanian; Joanne L Blum; Susan L Neuhausen; Judy E Garber; Mary B Daly; Claudine Isaacs; Rosalind A Eeles; Patricia A Ganz; Richard R Barakat; Kenneth Offit; Susan M Domchek; Timothy R Rebbeck; Noah D Kauff
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Reactionary hemorrhage in gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Mark Erian; Glenda Mc Laren; Akram Khalil
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for treatment of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  H Zowall; J A Cairns; C Brewer; D L Lamping; W M W Gedroyc; L Regan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.