Literature DB >> 31389741

Practice induces a qualitative change in the memory representation for visuomotor learning.

David M Huberdeau1, John W Krakauer2,3, Adrian M Haith2.   

Abstract

Adaptation of our movements to changes in the environment is known to be supported by multiple learning processes that operate in parallel. One is an implicit recalibration process driven by sensory-prediction errors; the other process counters the perturbation through more deliberate compensation. Prior experience is known to enable adaptation to occur more rapidly, a phenomenon known as "savings," but exactly how experience alters each underlying learning process remains unclear. We measured the relative contributions of implicit recalibration and deliberate compensation to savings across 2 days of practice adapting to a visuomotor rotation. The rate of implicit recalibration showed no improvement with repeated practice. Instead, practice led to deliberate compensation being expressed even when preparation time was very limited. This qualitative change is consistent with the proposal that practice establishes a cached association linking target locations to appropriate motor output, facilitating a transition from deliberate to automatic action selection.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent research has shown that savings for visuomotor adaptation is attributable to retrieval of intentional, strategic compensation. This does not seem consistent with the implicit nature of memory for motor skills and calls into question the validity of visuomotor adaptation of reaching movements as a model for motor skill learning. Our findings suggest a solution: that additional practice adapting to a visuomotor perturbation leads to the caching of the initially explicit strategy for countering it.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caching; explicit reaiming; learning; procedural memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31389741     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00830.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Gaurav Panthi; Rechu Divakar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Samuel D McDougle; Mathias Hegele; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Did We Get Sensorimotor Adaptation Wrong? Implicit Adaptation as Direct Policy Updating Rather than Forward-Model-Based Learning.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  How can caching explain automaticity?

Authors:  Nir Fresco; Joseph Tzelgov; Lior Shmuelof
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-12

6.  Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Henriques; Gonzalo Lerner; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  De novo learning versus adaptation of continuous control in a manual tracking task.

Authors:  Christopher S Yang; Noah J Cowan; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  An implicit memory of errors limits human sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Hannah R Sheahan; Lonneke Teunissen; Koenraad Vandevoorde; David J Herzfeld; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-02-04

9.  Use of explicit processes during a visually guided locomotor learning task predicts 24-h retention after stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Susanne M Morton; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.