| Literature DB >> 31389294 |
Marcus J Lyall1, John P Thomson2, Jessy Cartier1, Raffaele Ottaviano2, Timothy J Kendall3,4, Richard R Meehan2, Amanda J Drake1.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the commonest cause of liver disease in developed countries affecting 25-33% of the general population and up to 75% of those with obesity. Recent data suggest that alterations in DNA methylation may be related to NAFLD pathogenesis and progression and we have previously shown that dynamic changes in the cell lineage identifier 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) may be important in the pathogenesis of liver disease. We used a model of diet-induced obesity, maintaining male mice on a high-fat diet (HFD) to generate hepatic steatosis. We profiled hepatic gene expression, global and locus-specific 5hmC and additionally investigated the effects of weight loss on the phenotype. HFD led to increased weight gain, fasting hyperglycaemia, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and hepatic periportal macrovesicular steatosis. Diet-induced hepatic steatosis associated with reversible 5hmC changes at a discrete number of functionally important genes. We propose that 5hmC profiles are a useful signature of gene transcription and a marker of cell state in NAFLD and suggest that 5hmC profiles hold potential as a biomarker of abnormal liver physiology.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; Obesity; hydroxymethylation; methylation; steatosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31389294 PMCID: PMC6961686 DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1649527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epigenetics ISSN: 1559-2294 Impact factor: 4.528
Figure 1.HFD associates with reversible hepatic steatosis and transcriptional derangement. (a) HFD induces weight gain. Data analysed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc testing for multiple comparisons **p < 0.01 for HFD versus CON. (b) HFD was associated with an increase in hepatic steatosis score, assessed through the application of the NAS system. Data analysed by Kruskal Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons **p < 0.01 for HFD versus CON. (c) Volcano plot of CON and HFD liver showing up- (red) and downregulated (blue) transcripts (adjusted p < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg) and change >10%). (d) qPCR of cholesterol synthesis mediators in CON, HFD, HFD-reversal and CON-reversal (n = 10/group) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus CON.
Figure 2.5hmC profiles are highly reproducible and HFD and weight loss do not associate with global 5hmC changes. (a) LC-MS analysis of hepatic 5hmC in CON and HFD mice. (b) Schematic representation of gene regions in relation to TSS. *p < 0.001 versus intergenic regions (Wilcox rank sum test). (c) Integrated genome viewer outputs of hMeDIP-seq experiments visualising 5hmC profiles over three constitutively active hepatic genes showing reproducibility between animals. Each histogram bar represents score over one 150 bp window. (d) Sliding window analysis of 5hmC profile over all genes in CON (blue n = 2) and HFD (red n = 4) mice.
Figure 3.HFD associates with reversible genic 5hmC enrichment at discrete genes with biological relevance. (a) Scatter plot of changes in genic 5hmC versus transcriptional change; Δ5hmC = difference in mean number of normalised reads/150bp window. (b) Z-score heatmap analysis with hierarchical clustering based on average gene body 5hmC for (i) all genes (ii) top 10 induced and (iii) top 10 suppressed genes. (c) hmeDIP-qPCR validation of differentially hydroxymethylated loci and resolution in HFD-reversal group. Data are fold change versus CON analysed by one way Anova with Tukeys test for multiple comparisons * = p < 0.05.