| Literature DB >> 31386772 |
Mary Morgan-Richards1, Shelley S Langton-Myers2, Steven A Trewick1.
Abstract
The outcome of competition between different reproductive strategies within a single species can be used to infer selective advantage of the winning strategy. Where multiple populations have independently lost or gained sexual reproduction it is possible to investigate whether the advantage is contingent on local conditions. In the New Zealand stick insect Clitarchus hookeri, three populations are distinguished by recent change in reproductive strategy and we determine their likely origins. One parthenogenetic population has established in the United Kingdom and we provide evidence that sexual reproduction has been lost in this population. We identify the sexual population from which the parthenogenetic population was derived, but show that the UK females have a post-mating barrier to fertilisation. We also demonstrate that two sexual populations have recently arisen in New Zealand within the natural range of the mtDNA lineage that otherwise characterizes parthenogenesis in this species. We infer independent origins of males at these two locations using microsatellite genotypes. In one population, a mixture of local and nonlocal alleles suggested males were the result of invasion. Males in another population were most probably the result of loss of an X chromosome that produced a male phenotype in situ. Two successful switches in reproductive strategy suggest local competitive advantage for outcrossing over parthenogenetic reproduction. Clitarchus hookeri provides remarkable evidence of repeated and rapid changes in reproductive strategy, with competitive outcomes dependent on local conditions.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Clitarchus hookerizzm321990; Phasmids; evolution of sex; fertilization barrier; sexual reproduction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31386772 PMCID: PMC6852293 DOI: 10.1111/mec.15203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ecol ISSN: 0962-1083 Impact factor: 6.185
Figure 1Three questions arise from the distribution of male and female Clitarchus hookeri stick insects. Parthenogenetic populations surround sexual populations at Otaki and Wilton, so from where did the males come? Human‐mediated dispersal has resulted in a parthenogenetic population in the UK, but from where in New Zealand did this all‐female lineage originate? Blue (sexual) and pink (asexual) shading indicates the natural extent of sexual and asexual populations in New Zealand [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2Similarity of mtDNA sequences indicates the probable origins of Clitachus hookeri stick insect populations. (a) Sample locations in New Zealand, coloured to highlight two intraspecific mtDNA lineages as shown in b (pink parthenogenetic; blue from Taranaki). (b) Phylogenetic relationships of full mtDNA diversity sampled in New Zealand inferred with Maximum likelihood (COI 1,389 bp), colours as in networks and map, scale represents nucleotide site distances. (c) Parthenogenetic lineage haplotype network (medium joining, COI 1,307 bp) in pink, with the haplotypes of male individuals indicated. (d) Haplotypes from Taranaki lineage (blue) includes UK specimens (median joining, COI 1,307 bp). Circle sizes in c & d are proportional to sample size, and number of nucleotide substitutions that differentiate haplotypes are indicated on branches [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3Genotypes of Clitachus hookeri stick insects suggest that the UK population was derived from a sexual New Zealand population, that Otaki males result from population mixing, and Wilton males result from in situ male genesis (nondisjunction of X chromosome). Bayesian assignments of individual stick insect genotypes (10 microsatellite loci) to three genetic clusters (optimal model K = 3) is shown by three colours. Collecting locations indicated on the map are coloured to indicate dominant genotype assignment cluster
The age of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the parthenogenetic lineage of Clitarchus hookeri was estimated using five insect mitochondrial DNA mutation rates derived from different taxa and calibrations
| Rate type | Taxa | mtDNA genes | Age of calibration (years) | Substitutions per site per million years | Reference | Age of parthenogen MRCA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant pop size (million years) |
| Bayesian skyline (million years) |
| ||||||
| Interspecific | Darkling beetles | COI | 10.5 million | 0.0177 | Papadopoulou et al. ( | 0.1701 | 1.57E‐03 | 0.1537 | 1.55E‐03 |
| Interspecific | Ground beetles | ND2, COI, COII, Cyt‐B | 150,000 | 0.0285 | Clarke et al. ( | 0.1055 | 1.15E‐03 | 0.0964 | 1.01E‐03 |
| Intraspecific | Fruit‐flies | ~60% of mtDNA | 200 generations | 0.062 | Haag‐Liautard et al. ( | 0.0493 | 4.44E‐04 | 0.044 | 4.89E‐04 |
| Intraspecific | Katydids | COI | 10,740 | 0.0792 | Ney et al. ( | 0.0381 | 3.85E‐04 | 0.0355 | 4.37E‐04 |
| Intraspecific | Swallowtail Butterflies | COI | 10–11,000 | 0.0960 | Gratton et al. ( | 0.0315 | 3.66E‐04 | 0.0281 | 3.72E‐04 |
The stick insect data set had 101 haplotypes and 1,350 bp of COI‐COII mtDNA sequence. Molecular clock analyses used a strict clock and either a constant population size or a Bayesian skyline model.
6.2 × 10–8 per site per fly generation (as study insects have ~1 generation per year we converted to 0.062 substitutions per site per million years).
Higher genetic variation detected in sexual Clitarchus hookeri stick insect population samples compared to parthenogenetic population samples (number of alleles [N a], observed heterozygosity [H O], and expected heterozygosity [H E]) using 10 microsatellite loci, * denotes where genotype proportions deviated from expectations based on the Hardy‐Weinberg assumptions (using all nine autosomal loci with Fisher's exact test; p < .05)
| Location | Region | Males common | mtDNA ( | mtDNA parthenogenetic clade | Microsatellites | Inferred reproductive strategy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Cluster ( |
|
|
| ||||||
| Opanuku | Auckland | Yes | 4 | No | 3 | 1 | 2.3 | 0.56 | 0.60 | Sexual |
| Stony Bay | Coromandel | Yes | 7 | No | 8 | 1 | 4.4 | 0.71 | 0.68 | Sexual |
| Karapiro | Waikato | Yes | 8 | No | 13 | 1 | 2.8 | 0.38 | 0.49 | Sexual |
| East Cape | East Cape | No | 5 | No | 3 | 1 | 1.7 | 0.07 | 0.60 | Parthenogenetic |
| Urenui, Tarata, Rotorangi, Gordon | Taranaki | Yes | 20 | No | 18 | 2 | 2.0 | NA | NA | Sexual |
| Tresco, Isles of Scilly | UK | No | 9 | No | 10 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | Parthenogenetic |
| Gisborne | Gisborne | No | 5 | Yes | 6 | 3 | 1.3 | 0.06 | 0.38 | Parthenogenetic |
| Turitea | Manawatu | No | 3 | Yes | 8 | 3 | 1.2 | 0* | 0.40 | Automictic parthenogenetic |
| Otaki 2003 | Wellington | Yes | 3 | Yes | 5 | 2, 3 | 2.3 | 0.64 | 0.54 | Sexual |
| Otaki 2013 | Wellington | Yes | 2 | Yes | 6 | 2, 3 | 2.8 | 0.52 | 0.54 | Sexual |
| Otaki combined | 11 | 3.1 | 0.54 | 0.53 | ||||||
| Wilton 2003 | Wellington | No | 6 | Yes | 4 | 3 | 1.3 | 0.08 | 0.56 | Parthenogenetic |
| Wilton 2016 | Wellington | Yes | 7 | Yes | 16 | 3 | 1.4 | 0.25 | 0.35 | Sexual |
| Wilton combined | 20 | 1.5 | 0.25 | 0.36 | ||||||
| Manaroa | Marlborough Sounds | No | 2 | Yes | 4 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | Parthenogenetic |
| Peel Forest | Canterbury | No | 2 | Yes | 6 | 3 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | Parthenogenetic |
The stick insects were sampled from 14 New Zealand and one UK location.