Literature DB >> 31384109

The Impella Device: Historical Background, Clinical Applications and Future Directions.

James J Glazier1, Amir Kaki1.   

Abstract

The Impella device is a catheter-based miniaturized ventricular assist device. Using a retrograde femoral artery access, it is placed in the left ventricle across the aortic valve. The device pumps blood from left ventricle into ascending aorta and helps to maintain a systemic circulation at an upper rate between 2.5 and 5.0 L/min. This results in almost immediate and sustained unloading of the left ventricle, while increasing overall systemic cardiac output. The most common indications for using the Impella device are in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and to facilitate high risk coronary angioplasty. Other indications include the treatment of cardiomyopathy with acute decompensation, postcardiotomy shock, and off-pump coronary bypass surgery. A growing body of observational and registry data suggest a potentially valuable role for the Impella system in reducing the mortality associated with cardiogenic shock. However, there are, as of yet, no randomized controlled trial data supporting this observation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Archimedes' screw; Impella device; cardiogenic shock; high risk coronary angioplasty; mechanical circulatory support; postcardiotomy shock; ventricular assist device

Year:  2018        PMID: 31384109      PMCID: PMC6679960          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  47 in total

1.  The Hemopump in 1997: a clinical, political, and marketing evolution.

Authors:  M S Sweeney
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Micropumps to support the heart during CABG.

Authors:  B Meyns; P Sergeant; T Nishida; B Perek; M Zietkiewicz; W Flameng
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  From a lab type to a product: a retrospective view on Impella's assist technology.

Authors:  T Siess; C Nix; F Menzler
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Left ventricular support by catheter-mounted axial flow pump reduces infarct size.

Authors:  Bart Meyns; Jarek Stolinski; Veerle Leunens; Erik Verbeken; Willem Flameng
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5.

Authors:  José P S Henriques; Maurice Remmelink; Jan Baan; René J van der Schaaf; Marije M Vis; Karel T Koch; Evert W Scholten; Bas A J M de Mol; Jan G P Tijssen; Jan J Piek; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry.

Authors:  Krischan D Sjauw; Thomas Konorza; Raimund Erbel; Paolo L Danna; Maurizio Viecca; Hans-Heinrich Minden; Christian Butter; Thomas Engstrøm; Christian Hassager; Francisco P Machado; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Daniel R Wagner; Rainer Schamberger; Sebastian Kerber; Detlef G Mathey; Joachim Schofer; Annemarie E Engström; Jose P S Henriques
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin M Cheng; Corstiaan A den Uil; Sanne E Hoeks; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Leonardo Paloscia; Carlo Trani; Marco Mascellanti; Rocco Mongiardo; Guido Materazzo; Giampaolo Niccoli; Massimo Di Marco; Antonio Maria Leone; Italo Porto; Mario Attilio Mazzari; Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi; Giovanni Schiavoni; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.160

9.  A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.

Authors:  Simon R Dixon; José P S Henriques; Laura Mauri; Krischan Sjauw; Andrew Civitello; Biswajit Kar; Pranav Loyalka; Frederic S Resnic; Paul Teirstein; Raj Makkar; Igor F Palacios; Michael Collins; Jeffrey Moses; Karim Benali; William W O'Neill
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  8 in total

1.  Aortic Valve Leaflet Disruption: A Severe Complication of Impella 5.5.

Authors:  Alexander D Ghannam; Manabu Takebe; Taylor S Harmon; Scott Tatum; John Pirris
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 2.  Therapeutic Options for Left Main, Left Main Equivalent, and Three-Vessel Disease.

Authors:  James J Glazier; Bayoan Ramos-Parra; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-12

3.  Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0® Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France.

Authors:  Alexandre Le Guyader; Mathieu Pernot; Clément Delmas; Stéphane Roze; Isabelle Fau; Erwan Flecher; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Panuccio; Giuseppe Neri; Lucrezia Maria Macrì; Nadia Salerno; Salvatore De Rosa; Daniele Torella
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-03-25

5.  Evaluation of Thrombocytopenia in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support With an Impella Device.

Authors:  Erin A Houry; Brooke E Gengler; Justin L Alberts; Joseph S Van Tuyl
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-10-07

6.  Mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock: Rationale and design of the multicenter, investigator-initiated IMPELLA-PL registry.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Aleksandra Gasecka; Marek Grygier; Tomasz Pawlowski; Jerzy Sacha; Janusz Kochman
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 7.  Effect of Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony on Impella Hemodynamics: Mechanism and Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Raj Baljepally; Hassan Tahir
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2021-07-09

Review 8.  A Meta-Analysis Comparing Venoarterial (VA) Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) to Impella for Acute Right Ventricle Failure.

Authors:  Ziad R Affas; Ghaid G Touza; Saif Affas
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.