Literature DB >> 20082934

Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry.

Krischan D Sjauw1, Thomas Konorza, Raimund Erbel, Paolo L Danna, Maurizio Viecca, Hans-Heinrich Minden, Christian Butter, Thomas Engstrøm, Christian Hassager, Francisco P Machado, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Daniel R Wagner, Rainer Schamberger, Sebastian Kerber, Detlef G Mathey, Joachim Schofer, Annemarie E Engström, Jose P S Henriques.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective multicenter registry evaluated the safety and feasibility of left ventricular (LV) support with the Impella 2.5 (Abiomed Europe GmbH, Aachen, Germany) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Patients with complex or high-risk coronary lesions, such as last remaining vessel or left main lesions, are increasingly being treated with PCI. Because periprocedural hemodynamic compromise and complications might occur rapidly, many of these high-risk procedures are being performed with mechanical cardiac assistance, particularly in patients with poor LV function. The Impella 2.5, a percutaneous implantable LV assist device, might be a superior alternative to the traditionally used intra-aortic balloon pump.
METHODS: The Europella registry included 144 consecutive patients who underwent a high-risk PCI. Safety and feasibility end points included incidence of 30-day adverse events and successful device function.
RESULTS: Patients were older (62% >70 years of age), 54% had an LV ejection fraction < or = 30%, and the prevalence of comorbid conditions was high. Mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was 8.2 (SD 3.4), and 43% of the patients were refused for coronary artery bypass grafting. A PCI was considered high-risk due to left main disease, last remaining vessel disease, multivessel coronary artery disease, and low LV function in 53%, 17%, 81%, and 35% of the cases, respectively. Mortality at 30 days was 5.5%. Rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding requiring transfusion/surgery, and vascular complications at 30 days were 0%, 0.7%, 6.2%, and 4.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This large multicenter registry supports the safety, feasibility, and potential usefulness of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 in high-risk PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20082934     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  40 in total

1.  Incidence and clinical outcomes of bleeding complications and acute limb ischemia in STEMI and cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Mohit Pahuja; Sagar Ranka; Omar Chehab; Tushar Mishra; Emmanuel Akintoye; Oluwole Adegbala; Ahmed S Yassin; Tomo Ando; Katherine L Thayer; Palak Shah; Carey D Kimmelstiel; Payam Salehi; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Outcomes of pre-emptive and rescue use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with structural heart disease undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Nilesh Mathuria; Geru Wu; Francia Rojas-Delgado; Mossaab Shuraih; Mehdi Razavi; Andrew Civitello; Leo Simpson; Guilherme Silva; Suwei Wang; MacArthur Elayda; Bharat Kantharia; Steve Singh; O H Frazier; Jie Cheng
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Trends in the use of percutaneous ventricular assist devices: analysis of national inpatient sample data, 2007 through 2012.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Ankur Vyas; Alicia Gerke; Gary E Rosenthal; Phillip A Horwitz; Saket Girotra
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist device in high risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Omar Kahaly; Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  The Impella Device: Historical Background, Clinical Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  James J Glazier; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-12-20

Review 6.  Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Arun Kanmanthareddy; Dixitha Anugula; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  The Impella Recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Huy T Nguyen; Rucha Karajgikar; Samin K Sharma; Annapoorna S Kini
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Defining the role for percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for medically refractory heart failure.

Authors:  Navin K Kapur; Marwan F Jumean
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-06

9.  Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support in PCI.

Authors:  Jason Hatch; Dmitri Baklanov
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

10.  Short-term mechanical unloading with left ventricular assist devices after acute myocardial infarction conserves calcium cycling and improves heart function.

Authors:  Xufeng Wei; Tieluo Li; Brian Hagen; Pei Zhang; Pablo G Sanchez; Katrina Williams; Shuying Li; Giacomo Bianchi; Ho Sung Son; Changfu Wu; Christopher DeFilippi; Kai Xu; William J Lederer; Zhongjun J Wu; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 11.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.