Literature DB >> 31380689

"Will you complete this survey too?" Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research.

Allen W Barton1, Justin A Lavner2, Scott M Stanley3, Matthew D Johnson4, Galena K Rhoades3.   

Abstract

This study examines the ways in which collecting data from individuals versus couples affects the characteristics of the resulting sample in basic research studies of romantic relationships. From a nationally representative sample of 1,294 individuals in a serious romantic relationship, approximately half of whom were randomly selected to invite their partner to participate in the study, we compare relationship, individual, and demographic characteristics among 3 groups: individuals randomized to invite their partner and whose partner participated in the study, individuals randomized to invite their partner but whose partner did not participate, and individuals who were not randomized to invite their partner. Results indicated that individuals whose partner participated reported the highest levels of relationship and individual well-being relative to comparison groups, as well as individuals who participated alone despite being asked to invite their partner, reported the lowest levels of relationship and individual well-being relative to comparison groups. Effect size magnitudes indicated the strongest group differences with respect to relationship variables, particularly cognitive appraisals of overall relationship stability and satisfaction. Implications for romantic relationship research and study design are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31380689      PMCID: PMC7000299          DOI: 10.1037/fam0000583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  12 in total

1.  Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.

Authors:  N L Collins; S J Read
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-04

2.  Recruitment and selection of couples for intervention research: achieving developmental homogeneity at the cost of demographic diversity.

Authors:  Ronald D Rogge; Rebecca J Cobb; Lisa B Story; Matthew D Johnson; Erika E Lawrence; Alexia D Rothman; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2006-08

3.  Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

Authors:  Janette L Funk; Ronald D Rogge
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2007-12

4.  With a little help from our friends: couple social integration in marriage.

Authors:  Allen W Barton; Ted G Futris; Robert B Nielsen
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2014-12

5.  Correlates of Individual Versus Joint Participation in Online Survey Research with Same-Sex Male Couples.

Authors:  Tyrel J Starks; Brett M Millar; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-06

6.  Couple Resilience to Economic Pressure Over Time and Across Generations.

Authors:  April S Masarik; Monica J Martin; Emilio Ferrer; Frederick O Lorenz; Katherine J Conger; Rand D Conger
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2016-02-05

7.  The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30

8.  Assessing marital conflict from the child's perspective: the children's perception of interparental conflict scale.

Authors:  J H Grych; M Seid; F D Fincham
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1992-06

9.  The effect of depression on the decision to join a clinical trial.

Authors:  Yan Leykin; Laura B Dunn; Ricardo F Muñoz
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10

10.  Sexual agreements among gay male couples.

Authors:  Colleen C Hoff; Sean C Beougher
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  A dyadic approach to attachment anxiety and avoidance, marital conflict, and drinking.

Authors:  Lindsey M Rodriguez; Becky K Gius; Jaye L Derrick; Kenneth E Leonard
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2020-05-15

2.  Identity and Relationship-Based Discrimination, and Mental Health in a Sample of Sexual Minority Male Couples.

Authors:  Gabriel Robles; Trey V Dellucci; Sugandha K Gupta; Lisa Rosenthal; Tyrel J Starks
Journal:  J Gay Lesbian Ment Health       Date:  2021-06-04

3.  Factors associated with individual and couple participation in online sexual health research with Latinx sexual minority men.

Authors:  Gabriel Robles; Trey V Dellucci; Beverlin Del Rosario; Ruben H Jimenez; Carlos E Rodríguez-Díaz; Tyrel J Starks
Journal:  J Lat Psychol       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Perceived Psychological Control in Early Adolescence Predicts Lower Levels of Adaptation into Mid-Adulthood.

Authors:  Emily L Loeb; Jessica Kansky; Joseph S Tan; Meghan A Costello; Joseph P Allen
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2020-06-16

5.  Relationship satisfaction during COVID-19: The role of partners' perceived support and attachment.

Authors:  Yael Bar-Shachar; Sagi Lopata; Eran Bar-Kalifa
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2022-08-29

6.  Can Interventions that Strengthen Couples' Relationships Confer Additional Benefits for their Health? A Randomized Controlled Trial with African American Couples.

Authors:  Allen W Barton; Justin A Lavner; Steven R H Beach
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2020-10-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.