Literature DB >> 22545935

The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings.

Galena K Rhoades1, Scott M Stanley, Howard J Markman.   

Abstract

Most Americans now live together before they marry but little is known about how the transition from dating to cohabiting affects relationships. In two studies, we compared dating and cohabiting relationships in terms of commitment and several indices of relationship quality. In Study 1, we used a nationally representative sample of 1,294 unmarried individuals in opposite sex relationships who completed surveys by mail. Findings showed that cohabiting relationships were characterized by more commitment, lower satisfaction, more negative communication, and more physical aggression than dating (noncohabiting) relationships; controlling for selection factors mitigated some of these differences. Study 2 used a subsample of the Study 1 sample to longitudinally examine how transitioning from dating to cohabiting changes a relationship on the same dimensions. Six waves of mailed surveys spanning 20 months were employed. Findings of Study 2 indicated that individuals experienced declines in most indices of relationship quality as well as in interpersonal commitment after cohabitation began, though the frequency of sex increased temporarily. Constraints to stay together substantially increased with cohabitation and over time. Implications of these findings for future research are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22545935      PMCID: PMC5956859          DOI: 10.1037/a0028316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  12 in total

1.  Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs.

Authors:  Scott B Morris; Richard P DeShon
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  Communication, conflict, and commitment: insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey.

Authors:  Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman; Sarah W Whitton
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2002

3.  Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes.

Authors:  Galena H Kline; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman; P Antonio Olmos-Gallo; Michelle St Peters; Sarah W Whitton; Lydia M Prado
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-06

4.  Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment.

Authors:  Galena Kline Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2006-12

5.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Commitment Dynamics in Cohabiting Relationships.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  2011-09-15

6.  Coital frequency among married and cohabiting couples in the United States.

Authors:  K V Rao; A Demaris
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1995-04

7.  Physical aggression in unmarried relationships: the roles of commitment and constraints.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Gretchen Kelmer; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2010-12

8.  Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2010-10

9.  The significance of nonmarital cohabitation: marital status and mental health benefits among middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Susan L Brown; Jennifer Roebuck Bulanda; Gary R Lee
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  The Revised Commitment Inventory: Psychometrics and Use with Unmarried Couples.

Authors:  Jesse Owen; Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  2010-10-18
View more
  7 in total

1.  With or Without You? Contextualizing the Impact of Romantic Relationship Breakup on Crime Among Serious Adolescent Offenders.

Authors:  Matthew Larson; Gary Sweeten; Alex R Piquero
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-06-20

2.  Classes of Intimate Partner Violence From Late Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Hans Saint-Eloi Cadely; Joe F Pittman; Gregory S Pettit; Jennifer E Lansford; John E Bates; Kenneth A Dodge; Amy Holtzworth-Munroe
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2017-06-21

3.  Cohabitation and Intimate Partner Violence during Emerging Adulthood: High Constraints and Low Commitment.

Authors:  Wendy D Manning; Monica A Longmore; Peggy C Giordano
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  2016-12-30

4.  Fluctuation in Relationship Quality Over Time and Individual Well-Being: Main, Mediated, and Moderated Effects.

Authors:  Sarah W Whitton; Galena K Rhoades; Mark A Whisman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-04-11

5.  "Will you complete this survey too?" Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research.

Authors:  Allen W Barton; Justin A Lavner; Scott M Stanley; Matthew D Johnson; Galena K Rhoades
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2019-08-05

6.  The intergenerational transmission of partnering.

Authors:  Claire M Kamp Dush; Rachel Arocho; Sara Mernitz; Kyle Bartholomew
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Within-Couple Associations Between Communication and Relationship Satisfaction Over Time.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Justin A Lavner; Marcus Mund; Martina Zemp; Scott M Stanley; Franz J Neyer; Emily A Impett; Galena K Rhoades; Guy Bodenmann; Rebekka Weidmann; Janina Larissa Bühler; Robert Philip Burriss; Jenna Wünsche; Alexander Grob
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2021-05-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.