Literature DB >> 16881785

Recruitment and selection of couples for intervention research: achieving developmental homogeneity at the cost of demographic diversity.

Ronald D Rogge1, Rebecca J Cobb, Lisa B Story, Matthew D Johnson, Erika E Lawrence, Alexia D Rothman, Thomas N Bradbury.   

Abstract

Demographic and relationship quality data were collected from 704 individuals recruited to participate in a randomized study of relationship enhancing interventions. Recruiting at bridal shows produced partners who were more satisfied, earlier in their relationships, and less likely to be parents, with a marginally higher proportion of Latino couples. Radio and television coverage produced more established couples with higher levels of relationship discord. Self-selection effects revealed that couples from demographic groups at greater risk for divorce (those who had not completed high school, those with children at marriage, and African American couples) were more likely to agree to participate. In contrast, imposing a set of common selection criteria served to exclude couples from demographic risk groups and selected for couples with higher marital quality. Implications for recruiting couples to participate in preventive interventions are outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16881785     DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  6 in total

1.  Premarital education and later relationship help-seeking.

Authors:  Hannah C Williamson; Julia F Hammett; Jaclyn M Ross; Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2018-03

2.  Promoting a positive transition to parenthood: a randomized clinical trial of couple relationship education.

Authors:  W Kim Halford; Jemima Petch; Debra K Creedy
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2010-03

3.  Personality disorder symptoms and marital functioning.

Authors:  Susan C South; Eric Turkheimer; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-10

4.  "Will you complete this survey too?" Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research.

Authors:  Allen W Barton; Justin A Lavner; Scott M Stanley; Matthew D Johnson; Galena K Rhoades
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2019-08-05

5.  Sampling bias in an internet treatment trial for depression.

Authors:  L Donkin; I B Hickie; H Christensen; S L Naismith; B Neal; N L Cockayne; N Glozier
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?

Authors:  Hope Seib McMaster; Valerie A Stander; Christianna S Williams; Kelly A Woodall; Christopher A O'Malley; Lauren M Bauer; Evelyn P Davila
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.